Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L
Posts
5
Comments
772
Joined
3 yr. ago

I write English / Escribo en Español.

Vidya / videojuegos. Internet. Cats / Gatos. Pizza. Nap / Siesta.

This user's posts under CC-BY-NC-SA license. Ask me if you need a different permission.

  • lemmygrad because they are perceived as tankies / commies, and thus get all the kneerjerk reaction from the people who are unwilling to apply the same standards to the US, the EU or Israel.

    Hexbear, honestly no idea.

  • Saying you have dropped your support for things like fair wages and human rights because you can't bother to learn to distinguish how that's different from the right-wing has made me more right-wing, is not the win you seem to think it is.

  • nifty strongly curved arrows

    I should sort my ties this way…

  • Before Apple fanboys and bootlickers come about, let's quote the relevant part of the article:

    After the first order, the company reacted by removing the ability of U.K. users to use ADP.

    They are not fighting to your benefit; they are fighting for you (as a product).

  • "Centrism" in modern politics is "being too ashamed to admit of being right-wing".

  • Ultimately, fewer defederations, more acceptance of differing opinions, and being welcoming of users who aren’t interested in politics

    The problem is those two are strongly tied to the idea that the people who come here have to be respectful enough. The people who first populated these places did it to escape from things like capitalism, right-wing nutjobs and the like; saying only "oh we have to be more accepting of difering opinions" basically puts the blame on the victim.

    As for the subjects that are not politics, we have cats and beans. That should suffice.

  • if user A circulates cat pictures, user B circulates dog pictures, and user C circulates both, can user A block dog pictures from B and C, but still see user C’s cat pictures?

    To do that, you need either a system of trust where you trust someone else to tell you which images from C are dogs and which ones are cats (as well as a policy for what to do when a picture contains both), or an automated system that will scan all the messages and perform that determination for you.

  • Of course they are interested now, when it affects a white man...

  • This is one of the problems with relying on AI… it can produce an overwhelming amount of content with errors and inaccuracies throughout. If you don’t review and know the content yourself, you won’t know what it got wrong.

    Yep, and this induces anyone who wants to review the resulting slop to need to turn to AI as well to even deal with the amount (or dismiss as a whole).

    AI is a viral infection on software development.

  • I don't, but I do know it's those pedos who make the surveillance and the laws about it.

    So come on, what are you waiting for? Go be useful.

  • That's too many!

    We should summarize them into one standard that everyone follows.

  • Yeah and I am completely against total surveillance as well. But we need some solution to catch these predators.

    Then go catch them? We know who they are. We have the Epstein files. One of them even posts from the official Twitter account of the POTUS.

    But don't throw the rest of us under the bus. In particular when it's them driving the bus and equipping it a Mad Max-style plower.

  • (psssst, so was I paraphrasing :p)

  • Isn't that a bit much?

    We should unify them into one standard that fits everyone's usecases.

  • Their comments on the bug tracker issue regarding staying on non-AI versions are however rather worrying, and they've ignored the issue completely, burying their heads in the sand.

  • If you couldn't make bunk, don't piss your bad luck on other people. At least they are trying. Booing projects before they lead anywhere (or nowhere) is not really helpful in our circumstances.

    Ladybird for example got their hurras (and their boos) and then went down in flames because of being fascist nutjobs. They had their chance, they blew it, but they had their chance.

  • And yet what?

    No matter how much you think the world licks the boots of Chrome, Chromium is still not a reference implementation. Heck, Dillo is not a reference implementation and it has three orders of magnitude more justification for being so!

  • They were not in the United States

    Thus the officer has no rights to confiscate. There, done.

  • Destroying what? The phone is still there, you just have to install an OS in there or something. A charge with "destruction of property" hinges on the assumption that 1.- there was something in there before the passcode (could have been an empty profile) 2.- that was property (corporate interests insist that our data is not ours, so I don't see how the agent can insist here that the user destroyed his own property, at least) 3.- that was destroyed (which relies on proving point 1).

  • Programmer Humor @programming.dev

    20 GOTO 10

    github.com /google-gemini/gemini-cli/issues/16723
  • Programmer Humor @programming.dev

    So I'm learning CSS now

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Project resource management? Gantt charts, timelines, etc

  • Fediverse @lemmy.world

    US$ 30 million to reinvent the wheel

    notes.ghed.in /posts/2025/bluesky-free-our-feeds-mastodon/
  • Programmer Humor @programming.dev

    It's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.