In the War of 1812, many people opposed conquering Canada not because it would be morally wrong, but because annexed Canada would give too much power to the abolitionist states.
Then we had Andrew Jackson, the Trump of the early 1830s, who did a bunch of bad shit. And South Carolina kicked off some prelude to the Civil War with Nullification.
Pretty much everything from Reconstruction to WW2 was big corporate doing whatever they wanted with the American population. With some disruptions involving angry employees, of course.
Hmm, yes, but don't you see? Mr. Big Man ICE Agent wants to beat you into unconsciousness to show you how tough and scary he is. If you know who he is, you could get revenge for your cracked skull and broken eye when he's feeling tired and unalert one day. And the Enforcer class reserves the right to beat you to death for fun, not the other way around.
Folks like you made me realize that you would willingly vote for Trump if he became the "lesser evil" candidate.
"Yes, Trump is a rapist, a pedophile, and a narcissist who only cares about himself. But consider the alternative! The other guy openly admitted to launching gas attacks against Europe during his campaign, and says he'll nuke Iran the second he becomes president. Trump never did that! Trump 20XX!"
It is estimated that there are 92 million people living in Iran. The price of a human, ignoring the human's net worth, has a lower bound of 1 million USD (based off the heart alone).
With some simple math, it can be deduced that Iran currently holds at least 92 trillion dollars of human wealth.
Since Iran is considered to be an enemy of the US, that 92 trillion is subtracted off of the US GDP (~30.5 trillion USD), which puts the US in the red.
Therefore, Trump must reduce Iran's stockpiles of human wealth to get the US GDP to at least break even.
I am sure you understand, now that I put this in this very logical way.
Hey, don't leave me out. It's time for me to say some Both Sides stuff.
I vote third party whenever possible. When it is not possible, I vote Democrat.
When it's guy I actually like vs corporate stooge, I vote for the guy I actually like. But if it's shithead vs a piece of shit, I might as well vote for the shitty option. I like filling in the little boxes.
A lot of people don't understand this.
Early on, only adult men with land could vote.
In the War of 1812, many people opposed conquering Canada not because it would be morally wrong, but because annexed Canada would give too much power to the abolitionist states.
Then we had Andrew Jackson, the Trump of the early 1830s, who did a bunch of bad shit. And South Carolina kicked off some prelude to the Civil War with Nullification.
Pretty much everything from Reconstruction to WW2 was big corporate doing whatever they wanted with the American population. With some disruptions involving angry employees, of course.