Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)W
Posts
3
Comments
100
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I think this is exactly the disconnect: not everyone shares your vision of what the internet should become.

    What's really funny to me, is you go on this say that your vision is 'correct'. Clearly people disagree with yours. Please stop using chat gpt to sound more inflated than you already are.

    Not everyone wants it to be more populated for population sake. Why should I care how many MAU we have.

    You say you want the good parts, but chat got isnt telling you how to keep them. By keeping it small. If you want large and popular, go back to reddit. Not every place has to be the most popular.

  • Not the person, but get off your high horse, and either explain what you mean, or shut up.

    Thats a lot of words to say nothing of value.

  • Out of what, large scale, battery is available?

    I haven't seen one yet. Tons of prospects, none deployable on the size of say, the north american grid.

  • I mean sure.

    But I'll also point out the comment wasn't there wasn't any reason, but a logically sound one.

    Hence why I said its not logically sound to say era of cheap battery storage, because thats not our current reality.

    So sure, there's other points, but none worth discussing?

  • Gonna need a source on the age of cheap batteries.

    All large scale batteries are chack full of rare earth metals, which are not named for their famous availability.

  • Canada developed reactors to run on waste fuel from other reactors.

    CANDU 9 IIRC

  • Not them, but having read this entire thread, what contra points?

    Other than that, I haven't seen much in this thread.

    I see a few points of how Frances configuration for cooling may not be good, but that's not an unsolvable problem?

    At least more solvable than the energy storage problem.

    Physicist, not an engineer.

    You need baseline and demand power.

    Renewables like wind and solar are great for demand. As they provide power typically when usuage is peaking. But those power outputs drop when its needed most, so you still need baseline power.

    Nuclear power is great at baseline, but because it takes a lot to ramp power up and down, isnt great to handle peak loads.

    Notice the team up here?

    Why is it always renewables or nuclear. Both have their places.

    This solves the energy storage problems as well. Less of a need for batteries with rare earth metals that are.... Finite.

  • The only people looking to expand open source to mean things like open weights, are the same as people looking to have AI be a thing.

  • Ai disclosure?

    You should as a rule read community rules before posting your projects.

    Your missing the disclosure in your title

  • I'm not saying it didn't happen, but given the rest of the message, I have trouble taking it on good faith.

  • Being an open source dev requires thicker skin than you'd think, and even thinker than most people have.

    Either you go the community route where you build a loyal user base, listen to feedback, and have q community of contributors as well.

    Or you go the 'I made something cool for me, and its open so anyone can use it too!'

    The former is sustainable, the later is not if you domt maintain the idea that its yours first and only.

    Once you start half listening to people using your stuff, but believe what you want is right, starts to isolate you.

    You think all your users are stupid for their feature requests, because you don't need it. Plus you alone are in charge. Its your repo.

    This ego can continue to inflate to this point. I've seen it in both closed and open source (anyone remever when the FSLabs A320 for Microsoft flightsim with malware? Just me?... Okay).

    But this is by no means new.

  • And all 3 hinge on the premise of courts will do 'sane' things, without any kind of justification for them. So yeah, all 3 are moot if you remove that assumption.

    So how much money should be risked on that bet?

  • No, you made a large assumption that this holds up in court completely, predicated on the idea that anything but would be disastorus.

    I don't buy that premise, and neither does codeberg. So again, why should they put money up in that assumption?

  • So then why are you asking other people to on your behalf?

  • There is a good chance that LLMs are sufficiently transformative that courts will decide they don't infringe the copyright of their sources.

    How much money are you willing to put in to test that?

  • What's stopping you from doing it yourself? Be the change you want to see.

  • Not the person your arguing with.

    But what sarcastic comment? You entrrd this thread with a long winded winge.

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    How I host Authentik/Matrix/Headscale to power my network - Part 1

    whitewhiskywolf.com /how-i-host-my-critical-apps-for-under-85cad-month-part-1-setting-the-basics/
  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Cloud Free Smart Home

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Apartment Audio Solutions