Skip Navigation

Posts
2
Comments
569
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Sounds like you're killing it on the litter boxes. So, does this open floor plan allow for a cat to traverse the space without touching the ground? Having vertical pathways where your cats can make an exit without getting blocked on the ground is important for side-stepping conflict. I have a very patient cat and a surprisingly gentle toddler, and they get along very well, but he's often too excitable and loud for her. When he's in the dining room, blocking her path and getting rambunctious, she can avoid him by jumping on the dining room table, then to an island bar counter, then down to the kitchen counter and from there exit into one of the bedrooms. Similarly, in the living room, she makes use of the back of our L shaped couch to reach the two exits if she doesn't feel like engaging with the toddler playing on the floor. Some cat shelving, or even just some strategically placed furniture, can give them an exit route (doorways are tough, but maybe a small end table they can jump up on or something? Difficult to say without walking through your house).

    It sounds like you've got a lot of enrichment for the younger guy. The only thing I could possibly suggest would be adding more structure. You could try playing until he gets exhausted in the morning, then do his morning feeding, which would probably get him to burn some energy and do a big morning nap. Then do the same thing at night to get him to calm down for bed. For all I know you're already doing this, but it's all I can think to suggest. It definitely sounds like the younger guy is instigating out of boredom and the older guy is just is not having it.

  • So, first, drop the squirt bottle. It'll break up the fights in the moment, but negative reinforcement won't change the cats behavior long term; it will just make him see you as a threat.

    Second, how many litter boxes do you have? Litter boxes are an important part of staking out their territory, and having to share one litter box can make them think they're encroaching on each other's territory. Experts recommend one more litter box than cats in the house, but one litter box for each, in different parts of house, should be the minimum.

    Next, how much are you playing with the younger cat? If he's stalking and instigating most the fights, he might just have play aggression that he's trying to get out on the older cat, who might not have the patience for it. Try playing with the younger guy until he gets tired, at least once a day.

    Finally, look around your house and try to eliminate the areas where the older guy might get trapped. Give him escape routes, make sure he has a shelf or a piece of furniture he can not only jump to, but make an escape from. If there isn't enough vertical space, the younger guy is just going to run him down until he gets him cornered.

  • Beyond that, this, "wildlife cam," photo looks like it was taken from a phone held at face level.

  • That's one perspective. I would argue that, given the ways in which the two parties have created election laws to protect their duopoly, third-party and independent candidates will rarely be viable. Instead of spending finite resources attempting to compete with the massive Democratic party machine in the general election, where a splitting of the liberal/leftist coalition could very possible (if not probably) result in a win for thr far-right, seizing the levers of power of said machine through primaries is not only safer, but more likely to succeed.

  • I think he's just being pragmatic. He endorses progressive challengers in the primaries, and then he urges his supporters to support Democrats in the general instead of splitting the liberal/leftist vote and handing the Republicans a win. He often gets blamed for losses anyway (Hillary supporters are still mad) and he's made some bad picks (Fetterman and Platner come to mind), but the growing success of progressive and DSA candidates this year might be vindicating this as long-term strategy.

  • Anecdotally, I'm seeing a lot of normie liberals get radicalized by watching Democrats approve Trump's nominees, pass his legislation, and cave on their own government shutdowns. Turns out, if you pitch yourselves as the only opposition to fascism, people expect you to actually oppose fascism.

  • Yeah, Jonathan Frakes had an old hip injury that caused him pain when he sat down normally, and he's, like, seven feet tall, so stepping over the chair was just easier for him.

  • Removed Deleted

    Real world so boring...

    Jump
  • The Captain Planet super villains are actually pretty accurate. Looten Plunder still looks like the average Fortune 500 CEO (minus the 80s fashion sense), and Hoggish Greedly is basically just the President.

  • The Politico reporting is extremely damning, and these accusations really can't be described as anything other than rape. He's gotta go.

  • I'm sorry, but it really wasn't:

    The term originates from the 1984 movie C.H.U.D. In the film, the acronym refers to a group of humanoid, flesh-eating monsters that were once humans, but mutated due to radioactive waste. While the word may have started pejorative use in 2003 to describe any repulsive person, its usage shifted as it became popular in the 2020s on sites such as Twitter and Reddit, after the podcast Chapo Trap House frequently used it to describe those who are ignorant or far-right. Source

  • I mean, if it's Telegram, then it's probably a bunch of chuds trying to shift the meaning of, "chud," because they're tired of being called chuds.

  • Yeah, but that doesn't mean it was used regularly as slang, or that it carried the same connotations. "Lowkey," has been around for ages, but it wasn't slang until the late 90s, and it isn't even used the same way. ("Keep it lowkey," vs., "that was lowkey brilliant.")

  • Oh, I haven't heard it used that was. I still see it used pretty much exclusively to mean, "right-wing dumb-ass," but sometimes more broadly as, "online dumb-ass."

  • Yeah, the casual way, "f*g," was used, even into the early 2000s, is pretty shocking in hindsight.

  • Look, Gen Z has some stinkers ("that's fire," sucks, and that's coming from the generation that gave you, "hella,"), but their use of Chud is spectacular. A perfect encapsulation of every grubby, right-wing freak from incels to groypers. A near perfect onomatopoeia.

  • Yeah, well, maybe we shouldn't have our government ban athletes from competitions because you don't understand something.

  • I'm not qualified to answer that, and neither are you, but I don't give a shit because it's a goalpost shift.. IOC is looking at one study, while studies that analyze multiple studies indicate there isn't enough data, but what data there is points to there not being an advantage. I'm also curious as to whether they mean trans women or trans women and cis men when they say, "biological men," have an advantage, but it's neither here nor there because A) you're still cherry picking the data that conforms to your worldview and B) you've very clearly conceded the initial argument that the government should be in charge of this. Anyway, you done yet, or do you still want to be wrong at ne a little longer?

  • Note that other studies, including meta studies that analyze multiple studies, have concluded that there trans athletes don't appear to be at an advantage, and that their results are, "low confidence," meaning their isn't enough scientific data to make a determination either way. I actually shared the most recent of those studies earlier in this thread, but you ignored it because it didn't conform to your beliefs. Which isn't very scientific.

  • Well, this is an excellent example of an independent sports organization using scientific data to make their own determination on what the rules should be around trans athletes. Thank you for admitting I was right, I'm sure that wasn't easy for you.

  • Yeah, where did you think the, "data that proves trans athletes have a competitive advantage," was going to come feom? Or it's just up to science? Like, the abstract concept of science is going to set the rules for sports leagues? Or is there gonna need to be some authority on sports and athletics to enforce those rules? Some sort of athletic association? Anyway, if ypu think you parse words until I get frustrated and drop this, you are deeply underestimating how petty I am.

    (Also, as I pointed out earlier in this thread, what little science there is on trans athletes has determined that transs athletes don't have a competitive advantage,.so I guess you support including them!)

  • memes @lemmy.world

    I mean...violence is bad.

  • TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name @lemmy.world

    Not to get too topical, but...