Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
0
Comments
414
Joined
3 yr. ago

If you're snooping here, you gotta calm yourself down.

  • Yeah, but it also gives him the convenient ability to undo that ruling If a Democrat were ever to be elected, which, granted, is looking less and less likely.

  • Lower court judges: "can you explain your decision? We're getting a lot of criticism."

    John Roberts: "No."

  • What was flawed about the CDC prior to Trump?

  • I bet he is. Summoning salt should make a video about JD Vance if he becomes president.

  • No, not everyone at high risk can get the vaccine.

  • You sure do a lot of complaining for someone who doesn't participate.

  • I voted to keep your kid on Medicaid. Did you?

  • Yet not surprising to anyone.

  • It's easier for a camel to pass through an eye of a needle than it will be for him and his ilk to get into heaven.

    If I believed in heaven, I'd probably take more solace in that. But I would much prefer we enact justice while he's living, even if only as an example to others who'd wish to follow in his footsteps.

  • 4 day old account. Mostly down votes.

  • No.

    Don't do this. Let him be. Jon deserves a break, not more work

  • Isn't her job to traffic young girls for pedophiles?

    I didn't know that was a 9 to 5 gig.

    $5 says she 'disappears' shortly after getting out.

  • Quick! Fire the CBO!

  • Watch out for the keyboard warrior over here.

  • Well it mattered to me so I thought I'd share. But sorry. I won't do that again.

  • Not a rebuttal. I simply wanted to give context because I initially read it thinking this could be a current statement, but was mistaken. So I assumed others might make a similar mistake.

  • Wtf? Why so aggressive

  • Published Oct 2023.

    Edit: apparently adding a date of the article is being inferred as a rebuttal or statement of some sort. It wasn't meant as such. I thought this was current because most people aren't posting 2 year old articles. So I figured I'd share the date. That's all.