Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)K
Posts
1
Comments
182
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Because there could not be a more cut-and-dry example of an illegal order than firing on helpless shipwrecked survivors, that's why.

  • Every minute he's sleeping is a minute he's not actively fucking us at least I guess

  • Unfortunately we now know very well that simply doing a lot psychedelics is not going to turn you from a shit person into a normal person.

  • yeah 100 is plenty for most people in most situations. 600 to a newbie would be like if your first drink was a whole bottle of Jack lol.

  • it turns out you can effectively recycle plastic! And re-cycle it, and re-cycle it, pretty much forever if you get get into the Ocean, fish, and humans, it can cycle over and over again for as long as you like!

  • OMG will this woman please leave us all alone at some point or does she plan to live to 150 before she drags us all down to hell with her?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • haha yep that message was a more a secret one for my fellow browncoats ;) That opening battle scene blew my mind so much when I first saw it, like the Buffy guy made this? For TV? On a TV budget?!

  • Well knock me down with a feather, Dems don't give a fuck about extrajudicial killings, I may die of surprise.

  • Are they though?

  • hey man, you're welcome to take it up with the people who came to that conclusion:

    Michael Schmitt is Professor of International Law at the University of Reading, Affiliate at Harvard Law School’s Program on International Law and Armed Conflict, and Visiting Research Professor at the International Institute of Humanitarian Law. He formerly served as the G. Norman Lieber Distinguished Scholar at West Point, Chair of the Stockton Center for International Law at the US Naval War College, where he is Professor Emeritus, Dean of the George C. Marshall Center European Center for Security Studies, and Professor of Law at the University of Exeter, Durham University, and the United States Air Force Academy. Professor Schmitt is a retired U.S. Air Force judge advocate, having specialized in international and operational law. He is the General Editor of the Lieber Studies series (OUP) and sits on many international law advisory and editorial boards.

    Ryan Goodman is founding co-editor-in-chief of Just Security. He is the Anne and Joel Ehrenkranz Professor of Law and Co-Director of the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law. He served as Special Counsel to the General Counsel of the Department of Defense (2015-16). Ryan is also a Professor of Politics and Professor of Sociology at NYU. He was the inaugural Rita E. Hauser Professor of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law at Harvard Law School. He received a J.D. from Yale Law School, a Ph.D. from Yale University, and a B.A. from the University of Texas at Austin.

    Dr. Tess Bridgeman is Co-Editor-in-Chief of Just Security. She served in the White House as Special Assistant to the President, Associate Counsel to the President, and Deputy Legal Adviser to the National Security Council (NSC) during the Obama administration. She also served at the State Department in the Office of the Legal Adviser as Special Assistant to the Legal Adviser and, prior to that role, as an Attorney Adviser in the Office of Political-Military Affairs. Bridgeman is a Senior Fellow and Visiting Scholar at NYU Law School’s Reiss Center on Law and Security, where she created the War Powers Resolution Reporting Project. She is an affiliate at Stanford University’s Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC), lectures at Berkeley Law, and is a former chair of the American Society of International Law (ASIL)’s Strategic Initiatives Committee. Bridgeman has a D.Phil. in International Relations from Oxford University, where she studied as a Rhodes Scholar; a JD from NYU Law School, magna cum laude and Order of the Coif, which she attended as a Root-Tilden-Kern and Institute for International Law and Justice Scholar; and a BA from Stanford University.

    Go accuse them of spreading disinfo if you feel like it they wrote it jeez.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • FI. ERR. FLY.

  • I'm only phrasing it that way because people who I assume know much better than me what this is all about made the following conclusion (emphasis mine):

    The Sept. 2 strikes on the purported drug boat neither violated the law of armed conflict nor amounted to war crimes, because they did not occur during an armed conflict. However, if the facts are as reported, there is little question that the order by Secretary Hegseth and the ensuing order by Admiral Bradley to conduct the second strike were unlawful, because the killing of the two survivors was a serious violation of international human rights law.

    Moreover, both orders were clearly unlawful. Under well-established law, those who complied with the orders cannot escape individual criminal responsibility for the killing of the two survivors in the event they are brought to trial in a U.S. military court-martial, a federal trial, or a domestic criminal proceeding in another State that has jurisdiction, for instance, based on the nationality of the victims. If actually issued, these orders irresponsibly and unlawfully placed all those involved in the attack in serious legal jeopardy. If the reporting is accurate, those orders should, as a matter of law, have been refused.

    personally, I don't disagree that this feels like a war crime, it was ordered by the SecDef, after all, with a whole chain of command and everything. But according to these experts, who's analysis I trust to be way better than mine, this doesn't officially fall under the category war crime. Crime? Yes. Crime against humanity? You betcha. Massive international human rights violation? All day baby. But technically not a war crime, by the strict definition. But if you prefer the colloquial definition of "if a soldier is ordered to do it, it's a war crime" I can't say I really disagree with you.

    Edit: yeah ok dang dudes I'm not like, in charge of what is what, I'm just quoting information I thought was well-sourced and well-reasoned from some extremely qualified experts. If you want to send your corrections in to this institute and argue with them if you think your knowledge is superior to theirs , then please do so with my blessing. He's a Professor of International Law at the University of Reading, Affiliate at Harvard Law School’s Program on International Law and Armed Conflict, and Visiting Research Professor at the International Institute of Humanitarian Law, so best of luck. For myself I'm literally saying I can't disagree that this sounds like a war crime so be chill.

  • Z is depth, full stop, and I have my fists raised, Queensbury-style, to anyone who contends otherwise.

  • I'm really dreading the wild things he might try right before the midterms to alleviate this or distract from this, because this is the killer issue for Trump and he knows it damn well. Fingers crossed that the worse he does is drop the prime rate to 0 and print 5 or 6 trillion new dollars.

  • yeah I barely can bring myself to give like Fidelity or Charles Schwab photos of my ID, just even having a digital image of my ID on my computer feels wrong lol

  • I hope they do someday, they could easily compete with those little neighborhood walmarts.

  • You have to hunt for the deals there, like anywhere, and be willing to break up and freeze/preserve big packages of things. Most items are a little cheaper than retail, but somethings are vastly cheaper for the quality you get than a Walmart or Krogers.

  • Hey now, being objective demands that we lend equal credence to Leftyslayer's opinions as to Costco's, or are you some sort of biased person?? 😂