Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)H
Posts
1
Comments
214
Joined
4 mo. ago

  • Didn't even realise that, but i meant two different kinds of funny i guess, first use was 'this makes you laugh' and second use was 'odd and specific', a rocket, a skull, a mushroom, a diamond etc. If you can make a pill it gives users the feeling you can produce at scale and also gives trust because usually a shape is like a brand and a color is like a recipe or a certain batch. On tv i usually see round pills like medical pills, but i've barely seen those in my days.

  • The shape is funny this time, but pills have had fun shapes since for ever. Not saying this shouldn't have been posted here, but please everyone take these kinds of warning serious when they concern you. Dirty pills kill people.

  • I used to do this for almost my entire life. The orange todler made clean up my act and say US and people of the US instead of America and Americans.

  • Pacific could be renamed to Ocean of the Warmongering Pedofile.

  • Wrote this earlier to another reply to my comment, but i did not mean to say how a judge would rule if he did what was right; i meant to say what a judge might say in the current political climate.

  • I'd agree on renaming Mar-a-lago, you?

  • At this point, Flock is synonymous with stalkerware, which would already be concerning if it weren’t for the fact that people’s taxes are paying for the cameras, as well as the cops who believe anything this powerful should be abused as often as possible.

  • Yes, a hypothetical tax on savory things would also be a stupid tax. It was actually the second part that really triggered me, because that addition makes it seem like that person is mocking laws that limits peoples freedom, it was no longer about their health. This law in particular is stupid, there is a reason someone posted this to c/nottheonion. But the general idea of making unhealthy things is not a silly one and that is the belief that made me write my comment.

    Some people think everybody should be allowed to do everything they want without the government interfering. Those people clearly haven't been outside and have not look at the state of world. We're killing the planet and breaking our bodies. Not because we are making free choices, but because we live in a world that incentives us to overconsume so a happy few can live a good life on yachts and private jets.

  • letting only the rich use them.

    Main selling point would be how much easier it'd be to disown their loser offspring.

  • You remember those drives that required 2 usb ports, one for power and one for data? Those would do well on there too.

  • "Transferring 200GB of data" 😂

  • Ever heard of a DNR-bracelet? It stands for Do Not Resucitate, maybe they will start selling one against cyborg cockroaches? Maybe one with an rfid or nfc tag or something so it doesn't come near you when your life is in danger.

  • Likely the same thing humans would inject if they would be able to get close enough for that injection. Afaik there is no general life saving injection of any kind, but in theory it could of course be anything.

  • True, just like the fact that the plentiful and cheap humans are a finite source of wombs, while once you grow a bunch of babies with the robot womb you get enough eggs and semen to make more babies so that source is a bigger infinite.

  • I am not arguing in favor of this specific tax, I totally agree with you. It is a very bad thing the milk lobby got their way. My point is about the serious risk our average sugar consumption poses to our collective health and the idea that a financial incentive towards a healthy alternative is a useful tool to lower that consumption in general. I do not think soda with artificial sweetners should be included, and definitely not unsweetened drinks. Oat milk is much better for the climate as well, so taxing that and not cow milk that is a stupid move in more than one way.

  • Lovely how they went from having a one-child policy to having ∞-child capabilities in just a few decades.

  • No it is an article about tax on sugar, that includes sugar free drinks. My comment is obviously about drinks that contain sugar, so is this article, it is very relevant.

  • Thanks for clarifying, didn't know the difference.