From what I understand from the article, generating code does not grant copyright, although of it is proven that most of the work is human made then you can have a copyright (to what percentage has to be manual work to have a copyright? Afaik, nothing is in the article). So with this in mind, I see that you cannot apply a license what essentially does not have a copyright (if most effort is not manual) but maybe someone can prove me wrong.
- Posts
- 9
- Comments
- 96
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- Posts
- 9
- Comments
- 96
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
Programming @programming.dev Copyrightability of LLM-generated code: Can we license “vibe code” into Free Software?
Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world What weird searches you made randomly that lead to unexpected things/places?
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
Selfhosted @lemmy.world What us the best way to add remote access to my servers?
Selfhosted @lemmy.world How to keep track of system temps and hardware health indicators via dashboard with a proxmox installation?
Selfhosted @lemmy.world What is the easiest way to have a self hosted git server?
Selfhosted @lemmy.world Syncthing alternatives
Selfhosted @lemmy.world How reliable/realistic is to use a laptop as a remote file backup server?
Selfhosted @lemmy.world Trying to understand what should change on my current setup
Selfhosted @lemmy.world entire system backups onto the server - how?

Considering as of now generated stuff without much change does not have a copyright it is also not possible to apply a license. I am not a lawyer but I am quite sure about this one.