I read it and just like the systemd merge, this isn't the end for this.
We can circle back when it turns into full blown identification standards though if its more comfortable for you to come to terms with the reality then.
Also, "won't necessarily send the data anywhere" isn't exactly comforting.
I already got BSD on a spare laptop. Granted it was freeBSD and I think I might switch to OpenBSD since the latter's foundation is Canadian and not US based.
But yeah if they go through with this I will be uninstalling it off my gaming machine and switching to Arch 100%. I really appreciated that line about it "not being April fools" when it was introduced in their github thread.
Oh wait, there aren't people chiming in to call me and others a fucking idiot and a stupid man child and all the other talking points for suggesting that the systemd merge was going to escalate?
Fascinating. I wonder where they all went. Maybe they're on the BSD forums now, but somehow I doubt it.
Dude right wouldn't it be wild if instead of taking as many nickels dimes and pennies as humanly and economically possible for any and every single purchase you just took like, still an insane life changing amount that would make you rich and were able to provide for your entire family on and put everyone else out of business?
"Turns out instead of taking 80% profit margins I got 30% instead and that's how I put Amazon out of business" meanwhile you're still able to be stinking rich with more than any human could possibly ever spend in 100 lifetimes.
You know I think about this all the time. A lot of those rich fucks are on the hook for meetings and bulshit all the time. If I had to wake up at 430 am every morning to get ready for meetings would it even be worth it to be rich?
We'll.... Yes, probably lol but still it makes me feel better about it. At least I can kind of choose myown schedule with my current job. Not rich but I do get to sleep in sometimes.
And sometimes, every once in a while, that is priceless.
This is true but I always felt like there was an ulterior motive behind it.
Like wow all of a sudden MicroSoft cares about open source code and contribution? I always felt like they did it to figure out how add backdoors into stuff somehow but then again I am a paranoid person and always assume the worst with companies in the tech field
I finally got fed up with it last year and blocked the internet access of my TV on the router level becuase upon contacting support I learned that there was no way to turn off the microphone setting. For real. They just didn't add that feature in to my model. I still can't believe that.
It is a little incovneient that I have to turn on my PC before I can watch anything but man the freedom of knowing that TV won't be spying on me 24/7 is freeing.
Next time I buy I will be looking for commercial displays with HDMI and DisplayPort if its even possible by then.
Granted though, most of them happened during the 1800's I Will admit that your Whiskey Rebellions and what not.
But had those things not happened before and even the flex of the muscles in '46 I'm telling you we would have been one of the most oppressive shitholes ever around already.
And also the thing is, we straight up wouldn't even be an independent nation had we not had guns to fight the british so having guns is literally why we exist as an independent nation to begin with.
And see that's where youre wrong, I do see the depths it has slid into and that is why I am going to have a gun here. Its easy not to when you don't live near a major metropolitan city that has insane crime around every corner.
You see I think about the way things actually work, in practice not just on paper. And I know by using that thought process that when they "take guns" every gang member and drug dealer is still going to have one all that would do is make it to where normal people with children can't protect themselves against criminals with guns anymore.
That's the true reason they haven't gotten rid of them yet. The government here no longer wants you to have them but they know that by banning them only the worst of the worst will have them and frankly even just the cops here having them and not the people make me nervous because they kill us all the time already, with zero remorse or consequences of any kind.
If the DEA can't stop drugs from entering the ATF isn't stopping guns from entering and that's just facts. Only criminals will be able to get them then just like only criminals can get drugs now. People can call you gun nut or whatever but that is just cold hard facts man and I'm sorry that its true.
There are some that gained independence so that's fair you're right.
The soviet union singing revolution ones were probably the most comparable I'd guess as far as size goes. But half of the soviet union starving at the time, which makes for an easier revolution when your government is incompetent and already being dissolved slowly inside of itself.
Same with Britain during ghandi, they were in the middle of WW2 and forced the Indian people into it and thats what made the calls for independence even stronger and being in the middle of a world war they were just tired of dealing with it.
So sure, if you're government is already in the middle of giving up hunger strikes and singing national anthems together can get the job done.
Resisting US government control as it stands right now is more akin to Rome or Myanmar with how it will play out.
Also as far as size goes: more size = more people but also equals more cops, more mitary, more federal agents, etc.
Britain didn't have an entire portion of the country full of forces who lived there ready to jump when Ghandi was doing hunger strikes. But boy oh boy, the USA sure the fuck does and doesn't care if it would kill every single last one of us.
I'd be shocked if any other country let's Americans use their banks and markets but I mean I guess its possible I know there's forex and stuff like that.
I've always heard no one wants Americans to open bank accounts if they aren't living there
I agree communication and organization are key as well and I try to make that point to everyone I can. I try not to be too preachy about it but any chance I get to talk about Meshnetworks and E2E encryption I make sure to let people know it is the way.
Two things can be true at the same time, though. Organization is key but so is an effective way to defend yourself. And if necessary, kill those who are trying to kill you and the people you have organized.
I asked another guy this too but consider that nowhere in the history of humanity has any society ever overthrown an empire/government the size of the United States without many, many deaths and a lot of violence.
So you can call me a gun nut but if you want to talk about fantasy, let's talk about how peaceful solutions don't ever fucking work to get rid of oppressive governments. Literally, never. Not one single time in the history of humanity. Maybe like some small island nation or something but talking about your Roman Empires and your French Monarchy's.
So at the end of the day dude your suggestion isn't grounded in reality. I'm sorry that its that way, I wish it wasn't either. But it is what it is.
So far I have Ageless and regular Debian but the Debian devs haven't taken a hard stance either way yet, that's still better than taking a stance for it. At least there is some resistance. Adenix as well.
And while not Linux I'm about to install freeBSD on a spare laptop as well and if they take a stance for it I'll use MidnightBSD or GhostBSD.
I read it and just like the systemd merge, this isn't the end for this.
We can circle back when it turns into full blown identification standards though if its more comfortable for you to come to terms with the reality then.
Also, "won't necessarily send the data anywhere" isn't exactly comforting.