Skip Navigation

Posts
4
Comments
375
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I can tell.

  • Degrease it and throw it in a gross looking pond for a bit first. The rust and weird slime growing on it will do wonders for anti vaxxers.

  • I agree and recognized that. I'm more emotionally upset about it tbh. The debates aren't for the debaters, it's to hopefully disillusion and remove indoctrinated fears from those on the fence willing to read them. It's oft repeated there when people ask "what's the point, same stupid debate for centuries." Well religions unfortunately persist, and haven't lost any ground globally. Gained, actually. Not our fault they have no new ideas.

  • Much respect for introspection 👍

  • I'd love some obscure facts about Mr. Rogers.

    I grew up with him.

  • They said! Bonafide desk licker!

    But clay litter do be...clay.

  • I won't tell you.about civiity because

    How could that do anything besides shield the sealions, JAQoffs, and grifters?

    Not shield, but amplify.

    That's the point of the subreddit. I'm not defending them if that's at all how I came across.

    ChatGPT debate threads are plaguing /r/debateanatheist too. Mods are silent on the users asking to ban this disgusting behavior.

    I didn't think it'd be a problem so quickly, but the chuds and theists latched onto ChatGPT instantly for use in debate forums.

  • Worthless research.

    That subreddit bans you for accusing others of speaking in bad faith or for using ChatGPT.

    Even if a user called it out, they'd be censored.

    Edit: you know what, it's unlikely they didn't read the side bar. So, worse than worthless. Bad faith disinfo.

  • I think he should pay his victims.

  • Wow the reposter of the image should be imprisoned!!!

    /s!!!!!! Almost forgor.

  • I wonder what they like about it since cats can't taste sugar/sweet?

  • Also, is this a meme?

  • Wow. That's really fucking stupid.

  • *on a sub that explicitly bans you for pointing it out

    Very good research.

  • Cry that one of my RAM sticks failed.

  • Cats only have properties when observed directly.

  • Yeah fair, that's a reasonable criticism. I noticed the melodramatic air to the piece too.

  • Here’s a hint for the author: you wouldn’t be getting an article like this one published in a dictatorship.

    It's still a WIP just give them a couple years.

  • Dumb fucks quote goes here.