Maybe look for someone else, because I really don't have the time nor motivation for delusional internet arguments with willfully obtuse people.
Edit: Downvoters might want to check their profile, because they're doing the same shit to other people. Very clearly a troll.
Cut is also a big factor. After my breakup I got like a big pack of some cheap Amazon boxers and they were terrible (likely designed around small Chinese men and then badly upscaled). Too small (despite being XXL), and the cut was so weird... When walking around the legs would constantly shuffle up and my junk was consequently sticking out to one of the sides, so I had to frequently do the stupid shuffling in my pockets to pull the legs back down.
Got some boxers from Schiesser after that, a 2 pack which was of course much more expensive but something I'd just buy with every other order so that I could manage the money and they're a world of difference. The cut is better, they're larger and the legs are a little longer. No more moving up while walking at all and the fabric is also a lot softer / more comfy.
It did, you just did not accept the answer. Installing apps is just installing apps, regardless of its source. That's it. Sideloading, just like jaywalking, makes it sound like you are doing something dangerous, something forbidden, something you should not do. The whole locking down of operating systems is to take control away from the user.
It has a definition already, which is the same it always has been. And no, you don't need to differentiate this. We've always installed applications from outside sources. Hell, until recently there weren't even official app stores and shit. Locked down operating systems where you only get what the tech giant wants you to get is a very recent development in order to take control away from the user.
Because it isn't real. You aren't "sideloading". You're simply installing apps. You're not doing anything different, other than using a source that the big company does not like.
"Sideloading" isn't a thing. That's a term to shame and discredit people and apps installed outside of the official stores. Just like people got shamed by "jaywalking" for merely crossing the street. Both of those things were, are, and always should be the norm.
I didn't cherry pick a statement. I included the part where they said the very first draft.
You quoted the whole part, but only addressed the first half of it, contradicting the second one in the process. Saying they may not be able to incorporate feedback into the first release is a very different statement than saying they may not be able to incorporate feedback at all.
That's literally not what happened. lol
And what could they do? Maybe ban the trolls? One of them even had a freaking Gadaffi avatar. Hiding your shameful display of a community is also incredibly bad behavior and what ultimately was the final nail in the coffin for my decision to move away from EOS.
Punishing the person seeking help while doing jack shit to the people insulting & trolling while hiding the whole thing so others can't see is certainly not how I want to see the moderation job to be done. But if you want to circlejerk with toxic trolls, then go right ahead.
They were at least still able to write in other places. And given that experience I of course did not follow up with another thread, just to experience the same thing.
The link lists a bunch of things that did happen, along with the thing on partial upgrades, which is guidance on the Arch wiki.
It lists a bunch of inconsequential things when it comes to the distro. The worst were the pamac DDOSing incidents. The SSL certificates of their websites I really don't give a damn about but people then keep saying "yeah but if they are sloppy there then...", without being able to provide examples where the distro was ever affected by it. They also keep arguing about the packaging on the AUR potentially being newer than the ones in Manjaro and thus potentially causing breakage, which is a weak argument - especially with how sloppily a lot of AUR packages are maintained. And if you're super paranoid, just update the AUR when Manjaro updates.
Overall, hating on it feels like it became more of a meme with little substance, fueled by the general entitlement and elitism within the Linux community regarding their favorite distros.
Manjaro worked without issues for me for about 2 years, unlike EOS which broke within less than half a year and their forum is the most unhelpful and toxic clown show I've ever seen as they just insulted me to the point where the admins closed the thread and said I should make a new one if I still need help - hiding it in the process so it won't get indexed and shine a bad light on them. So I find the Manjaro hate very unwarranted and it seems to get way more hate than it deserves. Most of it is just a bunch of "what if" scenarios that never happened.
The Deep.