Whatever influence Netanyahyu had, it's naive to buy into the "Israel tricked the US" narrative. I'll remind you that Iran and the US have been on hostile terms since 1979. Every president has considered, or launched military options on Iran since then.
The problem with the "Israel tricked the US" isn't so much that it plays into antisemitic tropes (though it does), it's that it absolves the US from Israel's adventures and crimes. It's not our fault you see, we were bamboozeled by those crafty Hebrews.
We should specify the concentration of H2O2. What you buy at the drug store is 2-3%. The stuff at the beauty shop might have 10% to bleach hair or used as a disinfectant similar in effectiveness to bleach. At 90+%, H2O2 is a hypergolic rocket fuel that'll ignitight when in contact with any organic marital.
People need to keep in mind that Johnson, Nixon, Bush, and Obama all chose escalation in the face of loose/loose situation. A ground war in Iran would have been a catastrophe and TACO is a huge W for the thousands and thousands of people who don't have to die now.
It's an interesting article for those interested in Christian history in America. I'm not a fan of applying econ101 to everything. Looking at religion as a market competing for customers is the most atheist thing I've ever heard.
An acquaintance recieved her masters in geology from a state university in deep Appalachia. (you've probably heard of their football team) All of the professors were YE creationists and rejected plate tectonics.
I don't know any details, because this was years ago and I didn't think to ask questions. So I don't know if these were personal beliefs that you wouldn't know about unless your deep in the dept. or if they were teaching this crap to students.
I saw a clip from an interview with a "looks maxing" influencer. He was explaining how a date wasn't really worth it unless he could stream it. The interviewer asked him "what about just hanging out with the girl and getting to know her"?
they somehow detect willful deception, like people expect polygraphs to do, but with high accuracy
This technology is a fantasy. It relies on the false assumption that their are detectable, reliable, and measurable physiological differences between bodies that are lying and bodies that are telling the truth.
Polygraphs aren't unreliable because the technology isn't ready. They're unreliable because the idea that you can physically measure a concept (lying) is logical fallacy. (reification).
This is a common experience. But before you listen to the gender war bullshit about how it's just not fair to be a man, consider some of the other explanations.
I've been abandoned, and I've been the friend who chose the girl. And I've learned some important things.
it's the couple who forces friends to choose. most people would keep both relationships, but people going through breakups are myopic and insist.
I chose to be friends with the girl because she was a better friend. Not because I was endorsing her grievances.
I can't blame my friends for choosing my ex. I would have abandoned any of them for her.