Skip Navigation

y0kai [he/him]

@ y0kai @anarchist.nexus

Posts
0
Comments
111
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • "no"

  • Perhaps his existential crisis is a real "fish out of water" moment

  • Don't logic the poor moody fish

  • lol two way street. I blocks PayPal

  • I grew up in a conservative hell, have lived in very liberal cities, am an anarcho-communist.

  • TreasuryDirect: Prepare for ID.me – Your New Way to Log In

    Jump
  • Already couldn't get unemployment benefits where I live because I refused to use ID.me

  • is this a strictly American thing or just a people who write books for a living thing?

  • FTFY:

    How Rogue Officers Turned a Nationwide Tool for Stalking Into a Tool for Stalking

    or perhaps

    How a Tool for Stalking is Used by the People For Whom it was Designed

  • whale is not roadkill. whale is kill road

  • maybe that's the album title

  • that has no teeth when they can just pay the tiny fine.

    its like saying "you better pay me a dollar today or I'll charge you $20 tomorrow!"

    google is like "lol here's a dollar, we complied. also we earned $1000 working up this massive $1 fine. of course were paying on time, why would I want to put a late fee on my rounding error of a fine?"

  • oh lovely, a fine amounting to 0.8% of their cash-on-hand. that'll show 'em.

    edit to crowd source checking my shitty math:

    Google Cash-on-hand ≈ €111 billion Fine ≈ €900 million

    (900,000,000 / 111,000,000,000) * 100 = 0.8

    if I'm an idiot please be nice about it lmao

  • 3 lol. kinda sad, really

  • I think your line of reasoning falls somewhere between the "No True Scotsman" and "Persuasive Definition" logical fallacies.

    While one can be aware of their own threshold for what they consider "suffering", one cannot set that threshold for anyone else. To some, a papercut may be suffering, while others may enjoy physical pain and suffer when their dog dies.

    The point I'm trying to make is there is no true suffering. Suffering is whatever the sufferer says it is and it's a subjective experience, so that would apply only to them. We can, of course, generalize the idea of suffering, as Wikipedia has done in the definition you provided but again, this can really only explain the fact that suffering exists or maybe even the fact that many people consider many of the same things to be forms of suffering.

    You may enjoy the teachings of Buddha, as his beginning premise is basically "all life is suffering" and his teachings largely revolve around the nature of suffering and how to accept it / overcome it.

  • "we?"

    we are not billionaires. wtf are they doing?

  • "revenue-share" is a weird way to say rent

  • OK, but it should be mandatory that all feds can only use these cars.

  • oh haha no worries here. I'm often guilty of the same. i don't remember but probably had a sleepy brain when I wrote the original comment