Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)W

waterproof

@ waterproof @sh.itjust.works

Posts
2
Comments
7
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • UK government trial of Microsoft's M365 Copilot finds no clear productivity boost

    Jump

  • okay, but why did they used a guy beatboxing to illustrate their statement ?

  • What are your VPN recommendations for accessing self-hosted applications from the outside?

    Jump

  • Good point, I did not check if my router has already some built-in system that could let me connect to my home network with trusted devices from outside

  • What are your VPN recommendations for accessing self-hosted applications from the outside?

    Jump

  • Tailscale is very tempting, on one hand it should provide a pretty good layer of security without too much thinking and it is "free", and on another hand, it's a business solution, so it is probably not really free...

    Thanks for the answer anyway confirming that Tailscale is pretty easy to setup !

  • What are your VPN recommendations for accessing self-hosted applications from the outside?

    Jump

  • Okay, so that's pretty much the setup I had in mind. Good to know there is not much need for an extra step for security, thanks for the answer !

    Well, I guess that would still be vulnerable to DDOS attacks, but that would just prevent me from accessing my cinnamon apple-pie recipe from my self hosted recipe manager for some time. A bit mean, but not catastrophic.

    I wondered if there would be some other attacks that could compromise my machine with only a wireguard setup, but that's a good sign if there is nothing obvious.

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world
    waterproof @sh.itjust.works

    What are your VPN recommendations for accessing self-hosted applications from the outside?

  • Terminal DAW Does It In Style

    Jump

  • that looks funny, i might give it a try, thanks for sharing !

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I have used LMMS for quite a bit. It's fairly stable, and I really like the UI and the general experience, plus, it comes with basic samples and plugins with presets, which is nice.

    The biggest drawback in my opinion at the moment is the lack of native support for lv2 and vst3 plugins, which limits the access to some usefull plugins like Surge. That and the lack of a record audio tool.

    I tried Ardour which is much more complete. It's alright, but i'm not a fan of the user experience and it is far more complex.

    ZRythm is very promising, but is not really stable right now.

    So yeah, LMMS is defintely a good FOSS option and a good DAW despite the lack of some features in my opinion