An irrelevant but interesting take is that this applies as an analogue to a lot of stuff in electronics related space.
It is harder to receive data than to transmit it, because you need to do things like:
match your receiver's frequency with that of the transmission (which might be minutely different from the agreed upon frequency), to understand it
know how long the data will be, before feeding into digital variables, or you might combine multiple messages or leave out some stuff without realising
this gets even harder when it is wireless, because now, you have noise, which is often, valid communication among other devices
Getting back to code, you now need to get in the same "wavelength" as the one who wrote the code, at the time they wrote the code.
Mass deployment using a solution that is making you have to remove all other storage devices.That sounds very frustrating and I wouldn't want to do that.
On the other hand, you're probably an expert on disconnecting and reconnecting SCSI cables by now.
/dev/nvmeXnYpZ warrants another meme and is not covered by the terms of this memetic service.Please subscribe to the other service to fulfil your requirements.
I actually have multiple HDDs of the same model with only their serial numbers different.
I usually just open partitionmanager, visually identify my required device, then go by disk/by-uuid or by disk/by-partuuid in case it doesn't have a file system.
Then I copy-paste the UUID from partitionmanager into whatever I am doing.
Fucking around in /sys feels like I'm wielding a power stolen from the gods
I presume you have had to run on RAM, considering you removed all drives
I have a problem of "unable to suspend user.slice", when using a Virtual Machine.
When I get back from sleep, I see the lockscreen, but after logging in, I have nothing displayed. This might have changed since I haven't set the computer to sleep with that VM in a while.
In my case REISUB works. REJ and switching to tty also works... but stuff doesn't work well after that until a restart
Most high level programming is more about structures and “placing things around” than people like to admit and that’s 90% of all programming today.
Although I'd like to say, "it's not", that definitely is what takes up most of my time, even though it ends up being lesser part of the code (thankfully). But a lot of that is UI designing and deciding what might give a better UX, rather than programming.
Of course, if I were not using a framework, which does all the painting for me, I would always be programming the UI and that would be 90% of my code and 99% of my coding time.Also, I would probably take a year to complete a weekly project.
In my dictionary, programming for the UI elements has been done by those, that created the library that parses the markup language and does the paint events. They also have to manage number of separate draw calls and other GPU efficiency stuff, making it easy to just define most of he placements using markup.
But then someone could also say that when making LATEX templates is programming the structure of the documents.
I prefer calling it markup, because, even though people might prefer calling it 'programming', due to people's high esteem perception of the word, if you look at it from a neutral standpoint, markup is a word that represents the actual work, much more closely.
e.g. I use Qt Designer[which is a UI to create UI stuff, which creates an XML definition of the final UI to be generated] to create UI stuff, and in some cases QML[which is based on JS] and if I were to only be defining placements, shapes, sizes and colours of elements, I would like to call that part as marking-up the UI ^[of course I don't because nobody would understand, but if people did care about the word (and I kinda like the word), it would be more accurate], while the part where I define functions, timers and connections would be the programming part.
The F1 with a single seat.
When you reach the epitome, with noone to accompany you.
This breaks down immediately, because you have multiple others around you, on the same track. They are your colleagues, your friends and your rivals.
And I haven't checked, but I'd say the F1 is more efficient at running than the Lambos