Except that an autocomplete, with simple, lightweight and appropriate heuristics can actually make your work much easier and will not make you have to read it again and again, before you can be confident about it.
Can't think of anything. Edit: yes, I really triedPlaying the Devils' advocate was easier that being AI's advocate.
I might have said it to be good in case you are pitching a project and want to show some UI stuff maybe, without having to code anything.But you know, there are actually specialised tools for that, which UI/UX designers used, to show my what I needed to implement.And when I am pitching UI, I just use a pencil and paper and it is so much more efficient than anything AI, because I don't need to talk to something, to make a mockup, to be used to talk to someone else.
I can just draw it in front of the other guy with 0 preparation, right as it came into my mind and don't need to pay for any data center usage.
And if I need to go paperless, there is Whiteboards/Blackboards/Greenboards and Inkscape.
After having banged my head trying to explain code to a new developer, so that they can hopefully start making meaningful contributions, I don't want to be banging my head on something worse than a new developer, hoping that it will output something that is logically sound.
Wait, so the bash script that I broke down into multiple files because I was unable to create and use functions properly, could not be considered a script?
The word 'pan', came to me from using 3D CAD software and I considered the Jib and Truck actions as 'pan' and the original Pan would be camera rotation, which might be 'turn' (didn't use it as much so don't remember) which was less favourable than using 'orbit'.Good to know the word origin.
When I started using Odysee instead of YouTube, my page was full of "women vs men", woke culture and onlyfans-esque videos.I realised, subscribing to a creator actually made a big difference in this case, to get them on you page, because it's not a feed (controlled by an algo), but a simple, categorised list, with the "Following" on top.
In contrast to that, the YouTube's algorithm tended to create relations between videos (using who knows how many criteria) and showed them along with videos from the subscribed and more-often-viewed channels.
It used to show some pretty useful results and it would be a crime for me to downplay its usefulness.
Sadly, by the time I left YouTube, it had started putting the doomscroll content on my page, which is probably another reason for why I stopped using it.
I would call it: Another great mechanism, ruined by capitalism.
That was my thought too. And not a snarky one, but a genuine one.
I remember once, giving a civil smile, while thinking 'meh', on receiving a compliment once.
Because I felt that the complement was for the sake of complementing, but at the same time, the words were +ive, so I felt the need to respond positively.
That's 3 hairs on the arm you see. Give me my $90