Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
5
Comments
12
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I already looked into Authelia, and the "problem" I encountered is that it does not support "named policies" (I don't know the actual name): what I mean is to be able to create "only_admin_policy", "only_registered_users_policy" etc, and then in Caddy to be able to say something like this

     Caddyfile
        
    service1.website.com {
        reverse_proxy container1:1234
        apply_policy only_admin_policy
    }
    service2.website.com {
        reverse_proxy container2:1234
        apply_policy only_registered_users_policy
    }
    service3.website.com {
        reverse_proxy container3:1234
    }
    
      

    Instead if I understood correctly (and I would gladly be proved wrong) this is not possible with Authelia, as these policies have to be specified inside Authelia, so I would have two different configurations in two different places instead of having everything in the Caddyfile

    I hope I explained well what I mean

    thanks for the help!

  • How does programmatic access tie into the desire for a login form?

    I would like to keep files with "private" information protected from public access, but I would like to access them from a script. An example: i wrote a karaoke application to use with my friends, they have to go to a webpage and select the songs they like, and then the karaoke app connects to the server to get the updated preference file. I would like that the users had a "nice login form" to select their songs, and then I'd like my karaoke app to easily download the file while still keeping it password-protected

  • This looks very interesting! I see that it supports users groups, would it be possible to create "named access policies" (like "admin_only_policy", "group_XXX_policy" ecc) and then assign them to the various services directly in the Caddyfile? thank you very much!

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    How to enhance Caddy's basic_auth?

  • thanks for the reply! many services allows this by setting an environmental variable or through a config file, but sadly not all of them

  • If you can’t configure the ports of your services then there’s no real recourse FWIU

    Sadly this is my case... I guess I'll have to give up then thank you very much!

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Is it possible to map ports when using network_mode?

  • I'm going to free space for dinner

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Nextcloud or Syncthing - which one do you suggest?

  • "esse montà 'n sle bije quadre", and the literal translation in italian is "essere montato sulle biglie (cuscinetti a sfera) quadre"

  • In Piedmontese (northern Italian dialect):

    "To be mounted over squared ball bearing" = to be really strange, not as other people

    "Horse brand" = a product of an unknown low quality brand

    "To beat the goat" = throw a tantrum

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Doubts over Gluetun + QBitTorrent setup

  • 3DPrinting @lemmy.world

    I'm confused on food-safe printing

  • What is AFTL? Probably not "Anterior talofibular ligament" as the internet told me

  • Where do you live, that makes you pay 5$ for an espresso?

  • It would be cool if crossposted posts would have like a common comment thread or something like this: a crosspost does not copy the post to another community, it creates a "softlink" to the original post. This way, everything done to any of the crossposted post (vote, comment, mark as viewed) would be also applied to other crossposted posts. This way, we would only see a single post instead of 15 posts, and we wouldn't miss any comment from any of the communities it is crossposted. Obviously, users may wish to just copy the post to another community. What do you think about this? Should we open an issue on github about this?