It doesn't make sense because the protest is an invention.
or intentionally using low-quality AI output in their work without fixing it.
Translated: "our software tool works poorly and produces bad output. If workers do not work to manually fix the output, then they are InTeNtIoNaLlY sAbOtAgInG our business. Responsibility should be on the workers to fix our product's flaw."
I'm pretty surprised to see Zuckerberg included in this group in 2026. His company is totally irrelevant in the AI space now since the only relevancy they had was due to releasing their model weights publicly.
The llama 4 model was a complete failure that was already obsolete on release, and since then, they've stopped releasing model weights to the public. They haven't shown any ability to produce a competitive model since llama 3, which is now very old in AI timescales.
It's really interesting that they blundered so hard, because releasing model weights was a huge win for them that gave them early dominance over local and open source AI tooling and workflows. Most of their talent has abandoned ship, and now they have no talent, no competitive models, and no marketshare of local AI, right at a time when closed/cloud AI providers are becoming prohibitively expensive and inaccessible and local AI is taking off.
They'll probably be a textbook case study in how to fuck up, someday.
I'd guess the downvoters do. The apple fanboys really trying hard to convince themselves that their phone is faster than a 9950X 😂 they'll cling to anything that feeds the delusion
The DoD held a meeting with Vatican officials where they threatened them, saying the US has the military power to "do whatever it wants" and that the "Church had better take its side"
And the Supreme Court has already ruled 3 different times that congressional approval for interstate compacts is implicit, unless the compact shifts power from federal to the state.
I'm just correct, sorry. Not sure why you take the fact that Apple is selling a laptop made from phone hardware so personally? Apparently stating truth is bias and being a clown. 🤔
As someone who was very excited about ARM several years ago and still is using ARM for half of my homelab equipment, it's unfortunately rapidly become irrelevant. x86 CPUs can now run as efficiently at the same TDP while still beating it in performance with all the benefits of x86. Unless something unforeseen changes, I probably won't be buying any more ARM machines for homelab/server use. Still using what I already own, of course.
RISC-V seems cool though, but not sure that it will be more attractive than x86.
Those single core performance numbers are entirely benchmaxxed and don't reflect real world performance or reality at all
EDIT: downvoters in denial. They get better synthetic Geekbench numbers compared to some of the latest desktop x86 processors ("beats" 7950X and "meets" 9950X), but get absolutely smoked by those same processors in real use. Maybe your only use of a computer is running Geekbench idk.
There's literally magic eminating from his hands while he is robed like Jesus and the kingdom of hell (assuming it can't be heaven if American soldiers are present in it) opens up in the clouds above him 😂
I really disagree about the main punchline being panel 5, because the 3rd panel is honestly gold.