Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T

theunknownmuncher

@ theunknownmuncher @lemmy.world

Posts
0
Comments
601
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • DeepSeek ditches Nvidia for Huawei chips in V4 launch

    Jump

  • Quote me in full.

    Okay!

    You can run at scale, on huawei. You can also run it on a cpu

    Yeah, that is absolutely not what you argued.

    Anyway, you've conceded that I'm correct that you cannot run it at scale on a CPU, because running on CPU is too slow and inefficient, and that they instead use GPU hardware like Huawei GPUs to run the model at scale. That's good enough for me!

  • DeepSeek ditches Nvidia for Huawei chips in V4 launch

    Jump

  • Yes, you can run it at scale.

    at scale

    Shift those goalposts! We went from "at scale" to "it still runs"

  • DeepSeek ditches Nvidia for Huawei chips in V4 launch

    Jump

  • You've proved my point that you don't know what you're talking about by blindly linking to the git repo. Couldn't find any source that supports your claim? I wonder why.

    Sure you can serve one request at a time to one patient user at a slow token per second rate, which makes running locally viable, but there is no RAM that has the bandwidth to run this model at scale. Even flash would be incredibly slow on CPU with multiple requests. You'd need the high bandwidth of VRAM and to run across multiple GPUs in a scalable way, it requires extremely high bandwidth interconnects between GPUs.

  • DeepSeek ditches Nvidia for Huawei chips in V4 launch

    Jump

  • Nope! You don't know what you're talking about. At all. But you can have fun running a 1.6 trillion parameter model on CPU at basically 0 tokens per second at scale, MoE or not.

  • DeepSeek ditches Nvidia for Huawei chips in V4 launch

    Jump

  • I mean, sure. You could also run it by drawing marks in sand. It doesn't make any sense to do either, though.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • NPM yet again because it was one of the examples I used that you failed to address

    I clearly acknowleged that both package managers and the windows method are vulnerable to supply chain attacks.

    I'm pretty sure I noted your demonstated lack of reading comprehension, not ignorance. Doesn't seem to have improved in the last 2 weeks.

    Hopefully manufacturing irrelevant scenarios works out for you in your career.

    That's ironic.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I also never used insults... maybe you're recalling the posts where you called me a "clown" and "fuckwit"?

    I only stated that there are more security problems for the average user related to: doing a web search, clicking the first link, and executing a basically random binary downloaded from some website, ie the standard way of downloading software on windows; than there is to using a package manager.

    I clearly acknowleged that both package managers and the windows method are vulnerable to supply chain attacks.

    You just wanted to create an argument, and it's genuinely hilarious that it's still in your mind. I had forgotten you existed 😂

    Going by your logic

    You do quite a lot of talking for me and telling me what my position/logic is. It's almost like you're arguing with yourself rather than any of the points I've stated. Well, enjoy arguing with yourself still, somehow.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Huh? I have never claimed they are?

    In cybersecurity, perfect is not a thing. You can only mitigate risks within a threat model.

  • Anthropic Mythos shaping up as nothingburger

    Jump

  • Most all of the reporting about this is purely misinformation. If you actually read the papers that Anthropic published instead of the marketing material, you'll find that:

    • it was actually claude opus that discovered many of the vulnerabilities, not mythos, which undermines the "MyThOs Is ToO dAnGeRoUs" narrative. All of these capabilities are already out there for anyone to use
    • the researchers guided mythos to the vulnerabilities, not the other way around

  • Top Trump counterterrorism official placed on leave after ex claims she solicited funds from ‘sugar daddies’

    Jump

  • Lying for the investigation is a federal crime

  • Top Trump counterterrorism official placed on leave after ex claims she solicited funds from ‘sugar daddies’

    Jump

  • You can't lie about being a prostitute during your background investigation and hold a security clearance, no.

  • Top Trump counterterrorism official placed on leave after ex claims she solicited funds from ‘sugar daddies’

    Jump

  • Unreported income and relationships means she lied during her security clearance investigation. Which is a crime.

  • What band did you hear one song of, check the rest of their music, and find it was a one-off and none of their other music sounds like that?

    Jump

  • He is a jazz legend, yeah...

  • The "NTFS Resurrection" Has Occurred For Linux 7.1

    Jump

  • These Linux communities on Lemmy are just so damn cynical.

  • The "NTFS Resurrection" Has Occurred For Linux 7.1

    Jump

  • No, it emphasises that there's no reason to use NTFS unless you're mounting a windows drive, like I said. It does not imply anything about the "nicheness" of the one usecase, although, yes, it in fact is super duper niche. Being niche does not mean unimportant.

    Most all linux systems will never see an NTFS formatted partition.

    This isn't an argument against increased compatibility, which is only a good thing.

  • The "NTFS Resurrection" Has Occurred For Linux 7.1

    Jump

  • That's how exceptions work, yes. I'm glad you've confirmed that you understood correctly what I was communicating with language. What's the problem, you're offended by the word "literally" or...?

  • Uh oh

    Jump

  • Getting that far is already a miracle, unless the "We are going to" was pre-spelled

  • The "NTFS Resurrection" Has Occurred For Linux 7.1

    Jump

  • ??? Yeah, that's exactly what I already said?

    unless you're mounting a windows drive

  • The "NTFS Resurrection" Has Occurred For Linux 7.1

    Jump

  • I'm all for more compatibility but there's also literally no reason to ever use NTFS unless you're mounting a windows drive