Absolutely, and I largely understand this because I experimented, don't forget the battery
The gloves, and any taser, should have some kind of cutoff. But if they didn't and you dropped something like a perfect sheet of graphene between the contacts?
Something will melt in the circuit, if it's not in the conductor it's going to be in the battery
Nothing would happen... The circuit is between the pads on the gloves, you'd have to complete the circuit going through the brown shirt to do anything unexpected... Which is entirely unfeasible in any real world situation
If your clothing is conductive, it's just going to mostly flow through your clothing. Depending on thermal properties and how much current these gloves put out, it might heat up the clothing enough to cause burns
A year ago would have been the time to spring into action... Or better yet during COVID
At this point? We'll probably still win the midterms, hopefully have a wave of fresh progressives who will soften the landing, but our government has been shredded. Our economy is going to pop in the next two years (could be tomorrow), and our debt is untenable anyways
There's rough times ahead before things will get better
They're rigging them, but they've been doing that for my entire lifetime. For decades Republicans wouldn't have been able to win a majority or presidency in a fair election, but our opposition party refuses to move or step down. They're captured by Capital interests too.
What exactly would you have us do? Our empire is at the last phase of it's life cycle... It's collapsing.
There's no saving it. We're way past the tipping point... If we want democracy we will have to rebuild it, and we're in for a period of suffering before that can manifest
Until then, the best we can do is try to hold things together and keep people alive.
And hopefully avoid a last ditch major war... That's a common final nail in the coffin
Everyone needs a driving force. It's what smooths out the little problems and keeps you going
It sounds like you lack hope in the future. I think that's pretty understandable right now, it's in short supply
People also sometimes to say to believe in god. I am not against that but I do not get god. How can I get anything anyway that is outside my own comprehension. Outside the laws of the universe, my brain cant visualize it. And I do not think the man in a sky god can be real.
If you want to develop spiritually, start looking inside yourself. Learn to meditate, learn to focus on your body and study your mind as it works. And most of all, look for contentment in the present. Connect to the world around you, and the universe inside you
If you don't find God, at least you can find yourself
And as for hope in the future... Things are going to get worse for humanity in general. Then they'll start to get better.
This too will pass... Things are going to change, they are already beginning to change. You can be a part of that change if you're inclined
For now, find things you want to do, and savor them as much as you can. It doesn't have to have meaning. You don't have to justify it to anyone.
If you want to stare at clouds, stare at clouds. If you want to make music, make music. Whatever keeps you going, find a way to make it happen
Saying you may ask one question can be interpreted many ways
It could be permission, a command, or just a prediction
The truth teller could be giving a command, the rules of the interaction. The liar could be predicting you'll ask more than one question and lying about it
not really. you don't want to keep frames without movement, faces or license plates. then you can throw away most frames from a 60 FPS recording. 2 frames per second is better than nothing for running a portable surveillance station. then you can encode them in some efficient format with acceptable compression, and it's not that much anymore. massive 5G rollout was explicitly happening for IoT devices, to be able to handle the load.
Let's do some order of magnitude math... Let's say each car on average "sees" 100 things a day (which is very conservative since there's multiple cameras and with basic object recognition you're going to have a lot of false duplicates). Let's say each picture is cropped to a megabyte with compression, which would be pretty low res to grab identifying information from
You can't do much in the way of video compression, because this isn't a video - we're cropping pictures, too much will change frame to frame
So 100MB a day per car, that's nothing... For one car. How many cars are doing this? 10 million? 50 million?
(Oh, and btw 5G is basically just 4G or 3G outside of Metro areas in the US)
debatable. google picasa had pretty good on-device facial recognition more than a decade ago, on average desktop computer hardware. ente.io runs something similar in their smartphone app today, fully locally. detects faces very well even in memes.
tech that can go into a smartphone can go into any smart car too, and likely does.
It detects faces well, that's easy enough, and it can generally label the people because you only have so many in the pool of subjects. If you want to identify people in a population? You're not doing that on a phone. Even the best systems have a big problem with false matches
that's a wrong question. the correct question is what percent of the time is a car outside of the garage. lots of cars are parked on the street all the time while not driving.
Parking lots are not usually good vantage points... That's where most cars live
And as for disparate data points... Unless ever auto company is using the same system, it's going to take non negligible amounts of work to integrate different systems. Palantir is probably going after the lower hanging and more juicy fruit, like Ring doorbells and commercial security systems. Or, you know, phones
That's what it comes down to. All this for what? I'm not saying they wouldn't do it, or it couldn't be done, I'm saying there's better options that they are already using for surveillance
If they were to do it, you'd pick Tesla - they have the cameras and sell monitoring as a feature. They're reasonably widespread, so you'll get almost the same coverage as if all automakers were on board - remember, this is about tracking people and vehicles, if we're recording them we're in a whole different ballpark
Or, you know, set up 100k cameras at key intersections and get a more comprehensive system with a lot less moving pieces
Then could you restate my point in your own words for me?