Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T

the_beber

@ the_beber @feddit.org

Posts
1
Comments
13
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Boys, don't dev alone or you'll end up with a git log like mine

    Jump

  • Whenever I work on something, I don‘t intend on publishing, I use What the commit.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I found a blog post about this. The bottle in this particular image doesn‘t look like the one in the blog post, but it‘s a similar idea.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • It‘s like that one planet in SMG.

  • I guarantee it

    Jump

  • Tbf, 8! is a big number.

  • Seriously, just stop (or use Linux)

    Jump

  • Feels like everything is. Might as well describe every app by it‘s (now) secondary function.

  • You need to lock in

    Jump

  • The (effective) low-pass is only applied after the signals have been multiplied. This filters out the signal with the same frequency (and phase) as the reference. I have a more detailed comment on how this works in response to another person here in this comment section. This is useful for applications, where the signal can be drowned out by the noise, but you know what to look for, and where the phase information is important. (e. g. a DC signal that is chopped at a selected frequency or an AM-signal).

  • You need to lock in

    Jump

  • The device, I‘m referencing here is called a lock-in amplifier. When you try to measure an extremly noisy signal without all the noise, you can use one of these. If you‘re dealing with a DC-signal, you can chop it at the reference frequency.

    Here‘s a great write up on the priciples of this technique: https://www.zhinst.com/sites/default/files/documents/2025-10/zi_whitepaper_principles_of_lock-in_detection.pdf

    But TLDR: After the reference signal is adjusted to have same frequency (and therefore constant phase difference), you get a signal that oscillates with ω_\text{in} - ω_\text{ref} and ω_\text{in} + ω_\text{ref}. Crucially, in the case, where ω_\text{in} = ω_\text{ref} the term becomes constant U(t) = U_0 |e^{i \theta}| while the other terms from other frequency components (Fourier-series) still oscillate. This is where the averaging comes in. An oscillating signal will average (roughly) 0 over a long enough duration. The output is then the amplitude of the desired signal without all the noise.

  • You need to lock in

    Jump

  • Oh no… I just noticed an additional “ whoever finds it, can keep it (or make their own perfect version).

  • Science Memes @mander.xyz
    the_beber @feddit.org

    You need to lock in

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • And most of it will never even be used up.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Oh the duality!

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Unless they‘re like Spinors rotating in an abstract space.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump