Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
0
Comments
161
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Guns don't kill people

    ☝️ Uh uh ☝️

    Gunn kills people

    With guns

  • Rsync

  • What makes you think you can't leave a significant positive legacy?

    You can get involved with your neighbors. Invest in your local community. Adopt an orphan or volunteer at a women's shelter.

    There's a million things you can do to make a significant impact. Every person you invest in is another person who can go and invest in others.

    This idea that anything that's below the national or worldwide level isn't significant is a cancer on society.

    There are people who lived hundreds of years ago who, sure, you'll probably have never heard of if you don't live in the same area as me, but who have had huge impact on the community. The same is true for where you live. I promise you.

    Bring your eyes down, and look to make your legacy local. I promise you it's possible. And I promise you that it's significant.

  • I think the controversial bit, is that it's thanking a rival nation for invading and committing atrocities.

    It'd be like if Zelensky came out and thanked Putin for invading Ukraine, as it let him be president over a more united country.

    Sure, maybe technically correct, but people probably would be (rightfully) pretty pissed if he said it.

  • God I wish, lol. Pretty sure he's long since retired.

    This headline just inspired me to channel his spirit, lol.

  • Yeah, I'm not surprised. I'd imagine an experience like being kidnapped would really change someone. Glad the little fella's made it back to his family.

    -Ken M

  • Seems they rejected it outright. As suspected.

  • The catch is that this was always a non-starter. I said it yesterday in a thread about this.

    Gorsuch literally wrote the majority opinion on Bostock. As far right as he is on everything else, he's actually pretty good on LGBT stuff. Between him, Kagan, Roberts, KBJ, and Sotomayor, there wasn't even going to be a debate.

    This was simply conservative groups taking pot shots with cases. This never had a chance to go anywhere.

  • This is such a nonstarter, as Gorsuch was the one who wrote the opinion on Bostock. He's strong on LGBT rights. So there's a solid 5 with him, Kagan, Sotomayor, KBJ, and Roberts.

  • The people working are guaranteed pay by labor law. No one is debating not paying the people actually working.

    Any talk of not paying people is about those government employees who are currently furloughed.

  • Sure, but if I was a betting man, I'd say there's a good 95% chance they get paid. It's bad politics to do otherwise.

    I'm not saying they'll do it because the law says so. Just that there's a lot of reasons not doing it only hurts them with no real benefits.

  • Yes, all federal employees will get back pay, regardless of whether they were working or not. That was a law passed during Trump 1, iirc.

    Not that it makes it easy to go a month without a paycheck, but you do get your money after the fact.

  • Idk, with the way things are going, I'd be willing to take that bet.

  • Thanks. It's always a good reminder that 80% of the people on here are children.

  • I mean, I think it's pretty tightly bounded by when airports shut down. If all planes are grounded for any length of time, that's an economic collapse kinda no matter what you do.

    Plus with the holidays coming up? No, I think they are gonna panic when the air traffic controllers start walking out en masse cause they're not getting paid.

  • Even in your made up scenario it doesn't prove the negative. Maybe your mind reading didn't work because Apple has a mind wiping device that made them forget. Maybe the crystal ball didn't work because Apple made an even more powerful "crystal ball blocking" device. You can't prove that's not what's really happening.

    So no, you in fact can't prove a negative.