Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S

squaresinger

@ squaresinger @lemmy.world

Posts
4
Comments
1426
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • INDX Conversion Kits now available to public for Prusa Core One(+).

    Jump

  • I thought the point of a nozzle changer was to save money compared to a full hotend+extruder changer, because you don't have to double up as many parts.

    But that INDX system is so expensive, it doesn't make sense.

  • Slopaganda: Coordinated network of inauthentic YouTube channels are pushing secession to Canadians at Alberta and even U.S. annexation.

    Jump

  • Merz is a moron, but if the other bigger states in the EU and the UK align, Merz will follow too.

  • Anthropic Mythos shaping up as nothingburger

    Jump

  • TLDR: Mythos is strictly worse at finding vulnerabilities than Opus 4.6, and about on par with a specific cheapo open source 2B parameters (=> tiny and super cheap) model.

    It's all marketing and no substance.

  • Slopaganda: Coordinated network of inauthentic YouTube channels are pushing secession to Canadians at Alberta and even U.S. annexation.

    Jump

  • Nah, it's quite likely in the current climate that the EU would join in the defence of Canada.

    If the USA actually starts an intra-NATO war and doesn't just talk nonsense, everyone in the EU knows we are next. So better do a nice clean proxy war on another continent than to let it spill over to the EU once Canada is down.

  • Slopaganda: Coordinated network of inauthentic YouTube channels are pushing secession to Canadians at Alberta and even U.S. annexation.

    Jump

  • I'm kinda surprised nobody has done the opposite of what's on the OP.

    I figure there would be quite a few USAians who wouldn't mind to secede to Canada.

  • Until it affects me

    Jump

  • This here. I don't quite get how someone can argue that safe spaces for one gender should exist but not for the other gender.

    Everyone needs safe spaces, and women's safe spaces aren't threatened at all by the existence of men's safe spaces.

    There seems to exist a radical subsection of fundamental feminists who are against anything that might be good for men on principle. Kinda how there's a radical subsection of male assholes who believe the same for women. People like that suck and are exactly why we can't have nice things.

  • Until it affects me

    Jump

  • That opinion is somehow even worse... Nice catch.

  • Until it affects me

    Jump

  • Dude, you don't win arguments by citing inapplicable fallacies. That always backfires. If you want to cite fallacies, please read up on them and learn to apply them correctly.

  • Until it affects me

    Jump

  • No it is not. Please read up on what a strawman argument is.

  • Until it affects me

    Jump

  • Ok, let's step back from your litte offtopic strawman excursion to some random lemmy community:

    Do you think there should be any female-only safe spaces where men are not allowed? Yes or no, simple question.

  • Until it affects me

    Jump

  • Yeah, the false equivalency is that you are saying that safe spaces don't matter unless you want them.

    You are arguing in bad faith.

    The club doesn't matter to you. You don't even know which club it is. You don't even know which country this is about. The club doesn't affect you in any way, but you are against it, because you are against safe spaces for men.

    Men are human too, no matter what you think.

  • Until it affects me

    Jump

  • Genderswap your statement and you start to understand the issue. What is it about women that they cannot do or talk around men?

    It seems to me like you don't think of men as humans.

  • Until it affects me

    Jump

  • Because they are a male safe space where men can be among themselves. There are plenty of non-gendered shooting clubs, so here's a question to ask yourself: Why would a woman need to be part of exactly the one that is gendered?

    It's obviously not about access to a shooting club, since she could just join a non-gendered one.

    So why exactly does she need to abolish a men's safe space?

    Does the feminist meeting above have special words only vaginas can say?

  • Until it affects me

    Jump

  • So men are not allowed to choose their safe spaces, is that what you are saying?

    Or are you dictating which activities are allowed to be performed in a safe space?

    There are non-gendered shooting clubs. Why would it be not ok for there also to be gendered shooting clubs?

    In general, your post is all about "Safe spaces are only for me, screw everyone else". That's an asshole take.

  • Until it affects me

    Jump

  • Can you piss in a toilet that fits your gender and is just a few meters farther down the hallway? Can you shoot in the next shooting club down the road?

    If yes, why exactly does it have to be in the one that is a safe space for someone else?

  • Until it affects me

    Jump

  • No. It really doesn't matter. A safe space is a safe space. You think the guys at the shooting clubs do nothing but shoot? They talk there about men-specific issues.

    There are plenty of non-gender restricted shooting clubs in my country and there are womens toilets in my country too. It's not about women not being allowed to piss or shoot. It's about these specific women not being ok with the fact that safe spaces for men exist.

    Same as the guys in the OP. They don't protest because they specifically need to be in this meeting because they want to discuss women-specific issues. They are just not ok with safe spaces for women existing.

    In both directions it's a power thing. People like that (no matter the gender) get off on taking things away from others. The point is not to be able to be in that place, but to take away safe spaces from someone else. And that's an asshole move for asshole reasons no matter if the person doing that is a man or a woman.

    So what about you? Are you ok with male safe spaces existing? If not, tell me, what reason for that do you have that is not an asshole reason?

  • Until it affects me

    Jump

  • You know, this is quite common for both genders. A major part of earlier feminist demands was "We want to get in on all the male spaces". You know, having the right to go to football games, military, and so on.

    It's currently quite a big political topic in my country that feminists are demanding that some traditional men-only shooting clubs should open up to women. A ton of women demanding that the clubs are opened for women aren't even interested in actually joining these shooting clubs (and in fact often wouldn't even be allowed to join because they are regional clubs and they are from a different region), but that doesn't matter.

    What they protest for is not that they can actually join, but that they'd be allowed to join in theory.

    It's also a quite big thing over here that women started to go into men's restrooms during events and such when there's a queue on the women's restroom.

    So why would anyone be surprised that the same thing happens the other way round too?

    There are always some idiots who's identity hinges on making sure others can't have safe spaces.

  • Removed

    Instant Download STL Files: Ready-to-Print Models Save Time

    Jump

  • Btw, why is it that STEP isn't natively supported in many slicers? Are there patents or something on them?

  • All phones sold in the EU to have replaceable batteries from 2027

    Jump

  • Which would make it pretty simple to just make this small area waterproof.