Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
2
Comments
68
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • God, there really is something there with that "problem!" signal that our brains can give off before any conscious dots have been connected. And this is for abstract shit that you'd figure our monkey brains wouldn't give a damn about.

  • I'm going to copy my original comment:

    Not for nothing, but the tendency for people who get along purely by being conventionally attractive to starfish isn't like, a secret. Lack of effort isn't really a gendered thing.

    Where I very specifically narrow it down to vapid people who are in it for self-pleasure as opposed to mutual enjoyment.

    The acrobatic inception of the idea that we're talking about people reliving trauma instead of just being emotionally checked out like the entire previous thread implied is what I take issue with, it's some legitimately heinous fake ally shit to use that as a non-sequiter argument.

    And yes, implying that I or the guy before me continued on through a partner reliving trauma IS nonconsent which IS rape. You can't imply one without implying the other.

  • Can you elaborate on

    maybe surprisingly to you

    ?

  • Not for nothing, but the tendency for people who get along purely by being conventionally attractive to starfish isn't like, a secret. Lack of effort isn't really a gendered thing.

  • Yeah, but not all administrative work is for Nazi Germany, that's his point. Unicef has a website, not sure I could confidently call their engineers Nazis.

  • Wait, I'm so confused, what's your definition of a systems language?

  • Wait, what? How? It compiles down to bare metal without a runtime. People write OSes and program microcontrollers with it. For any arbitrary C program, it's possible to write Rust code such that it compiles down to the same bytecode. Am I missing something?

  • OH, damn, I came in here all angry haha

  • Wouldn't that basically be any action that didn't start in the prefrontal cortex? There are plenty of fauna that are basically entirely composed of "default action".

  • Statements like "async is a language design dead-end" is the confidently correct misinfo that I'm talking about. You can't expect anyone to take you seriously if you authoritatively present your opinions as gospel.

    Should I instead have interpreted it as "async is a language design dead-end, and by dead-end I mean overfitted standard for the problem space?" Because I really have to be charitable and put words in your mouth to paint your argument in a good light.

  • Jfc that's a bit of a stretch. You basically just said "you are wrong to use those features, and if you don't use those features then my solution is great". Like yeah, no shit, if I wanted a toy language I'd go back to using Logo.

    "no visibility modifier" should probably mean "public"

    For-fucking-real?

    instead put different targets into different folders: much easier, works better

    Ahh, yes, file-based programming, the most usable and ergonomic pattern for cross-cutting concerns. /s

    async should not exist at all

    The most I'll give you there is that it's used more frequently than it should. But it is far and away the best abstraction for bare-metal concurrency without a runtime. Your "dead end" comment reeks of writing off an entire language feature because you don't understand it or why it solves problems no other language feature solves as well.

    Normally I'm open to discussing the merits and comparing drawbacks to certain approaches, but of course I'm going to be cross if you dump a bunch of confident horseshit on me. Like, wtf man??

  • Hmm, I mean I totally understand the overlap in functionality. Especially when you get into the Java Lombok situation where annotations are as structural as the modifiers themselves. But there are clear cases in things like Python and Rust where the modifiers are a clear meta-programming that are mostly outside the scope of the language itself.

    Granted, Rust is a weird example where annotations tend to "graduate" to the language itself, like in the form of #[async], but that clear delineation of what's in the language itself and what's defined as post-processing still leaves it more readable than if we heaped a chunk of similar-looking-but-willdy-different-effect-wise tokens on top of our function/type definition. E.g.,

     
        
    #[cfg(target_os = "windows")]
    #[pub] #[async] fn some_func() {
        #[mut] let my_var = 3u2;
        // ...
    
      

    Vs.

     
        
    #[cfg(target_os = "windows")]
    pub async fn some_func() {
        let mut my_var = 3u2;
        // ...
    
      

    Like, I do get the similarity in function, but it's almost like why we have capitalization in our natural languages. Making language-defined features "louder" and more ingrained in the language itself makes sense, even if the border is fuzzy.

    Edit: even going the other direction, and we do:

     
        
    pub cfg(target_os = "windows") async fn some_func() {
        let mut my_var = 3u2;
        // ...
    
      

    That homogenization is still a bit of a bitch to read

  • Under pressure! Pushing down on me, pressing down on you, you're an asshole

  • Ty! 😊

  • Okay, okay, Jesus Christ, he's not a good person and you have receipts. I concede.

  • I buy it -- at what point did he imply he's MAGA? What he said is a statement on the reality of the nation's finances. Can you please be a little more civil?

  • I could not imagine a dumber possible move than trying to lower interest rates when gas is this high, wtf

  • That's why I'm top of the bell curve, babbyyyyyy

  • News @lemmy.world

    Elon Musk threatens to sue for custody after Ashley St. Clair apologizes for transphobia

    www.yahoo.com /entertainment/celebrity/articles/elon-musk-threatens-sue-custody-161618831.html
  • politics @lemmy.world

    Trump reveals 'big, big surprise' for ailing Democrats as he warns Blue states will 'totally disappear off the map'

    www.dailymail.co.uk /news/article-14419949/trump-surprise-democrats-midterm-election-2026.html