the only pause it gives me is when i notice nonsensical details blending into each other, the only emotion it moves in me is then disgust and foolishness as i just spent time on slop that was not an expression of something, but an intentionless imitation of one. and it sure as hell doesn't make me self reflect as it manages to be both shallow and hollow
it's not AI "art" itself that sparked a conversation, no singular piece stands out as something people talk about (a piece that is more than just a more seamless version of the pervious attempts, something memorable even after it stops being the best at imitation). The talk is not about AI "art" itself it's about the idea of it. Nobody points to a single thing AI made and claims that is proof it's not art, because it's not individual pieces that "make us think" – it's the concept of an intentionless thing being fed human art and then making misshapen copies of it at the whims of people who can't be bothered to engage with art at all.
sure it does make you think, but only if you - knowingly or not - treat the entire emergence of AI slop as a kind of performance art itself, any individual piece of slop is not the topic here
never mind a canvas, if the guy cared in the slightest about the "art" AI made he'd at least print it on poster paper
this experiment shows how even the "artists" just do not care about those images, and why would they? why would any of us care?
this shows exactly the core of the issue - every piece of art made by a human, no matter how good or bad (whatever that means), is a reflection of the artist. Sometimes they pour their entire soul into a piece, sometimes just a small part of them, but it's always a reflection of them. So the artist will care about what they've made because it's their own self, in a way. And others will care about it too, because we crave to get to know others, understand them, see the world how they see it - and art allows us to glimpse just that.
AI slop elicits none of those emotions, there is no artist to care about, no reflection of the self, no worldview to glimpse, no way of caring about it, nothing – even if it was you who wrote the prompt, you just can't bring yourself to give a shit
i mean, we have the solutions to a lot of problems already
traffic? public trains
hunger? just like, feed people
global warming? reduce fossil fuel usage and stop poisoning the oceans
homeless? literally so many empty homes, put people in them???
and we've had many smart people create step by step plans for all of these!
the thing is... i guess rich people want a solution that doesn't involve them paying for something that's good not just for them but for others? so all those plans fail at step 1 - have empathy
natural laws of the universe can be described with our maths. but i'm pretty sure the universe didn't go "ah yes, 1+2=3 i can work with that! let there be light".
the numbers, the symbols, the equations - they're all human made, an attempt to describe things in a way that can be understood by us. but is this how they are? of course not. no wave or particle would describe itself the way we describe them, in fact they wouldn't describe themselves at all - they simply are
the distance light travels at a certain time - then it'll just be based on our artificial units of time
cesium oscillation i don't know much about but from what i quickly read it's also about keeping time, 1s to be precise, which is still an arbitrary unit
depends on your definition of novice.
a novice that is incredibly passionate and has been absorbing knowledge and experience at a fast pace? sure
a novice that just got a camera who's shooting in .jpeg and has yet to hear of lightroom? (or alternative photo editing software) no