Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P
Posts
1
Comments
21
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • For sure on the art. I'm a graphic artist by education and I'm already working with another full-time artist on the application logos. When I make enough I'm planning to hire a proper web developer for the frontend/web design as that's onc area I do lean pretty heavy on the LLM's for assistance.

    Funny you should mention the AI vs LLM labeling as I much prefer to call them LLM's or "models", but I'm trying to keep it accessible for non-technical people. I think I'll go back through and rename though.

    Also most of the tools are deterministic, with the LLM's filling in gaps where there needs to be some amount of probabilistic interaction, like figuring out what you could cook given only the ingredients in your pantry, or rewriting a resume 26 million ways to satisfy the ATS filters.

    If you don't want to use those features, nothing forcing you. They're useful for tracking and organizing without the LLM at all.

  • I'm in the process of launching a new business as a single dev, and I want to be upfront about my use of AI, but I notice as soon as I mention any LLM, most people assume what I've built is "vibe coded" without even looking at the applications themselves.

    I spent almost two months just setting up the devops side of things before I even considered publishing. Feedback buttons in the apps automatically open issues on my Forgejo, push mirrors to GitHub and Codeberg, and I do weekly progress reports internally (I stopped posting to Lemmy after people felt spammed and now I just post on the site blog)

    I'm just not sure how to make it easy to tell that I'm actually putting my heart and soul into building software that should help people.

    If curious: https://circuitforge.tech/

  • This is the nightmare scenario for any team that built their whole workflow around a cloud API. No warning, no clear reason, no real support path. just a Google form and 60 people sitting on their hands.

    The uncomfortable truth is that "terms of service" at this scale is just "we can pull the rug whenever." Anthropic isn't unique here either. OpenAI, Google, all of them have the same opaque enforcement problem. It's a big part of why I've been building tools that run on local inference by default. Not because cloud is bad, but because your users shouldn't be one vague policy complaint away from a complete outage.

    Local gives you continuity even when the upstream disappears.

  • Working on it! I should have an update later today

  • Working on it! Will have an update for you later today

  • Very cool! I'm actually interested in helping with testing and porting to other architecture. Made a comment on the open issue for ARM support, happy to open a PR if you're interested

  • Basically for fun yes, gamifying development. Anyhoo yeah the idea is you would encounter bugs when discovering bugs or working on bugfix branches, and other types for a few other circumstances.

    At the moment the only real rewards are having specific buddies you can assign to specific sessions or threads and they'll chime in like the OG buddy system, level up based on goals accomplished, no real effect on the code itself, just emergent complexity from whatever the user is up to.

    Just FYI, I'm not using LLMs for art apart from placeholders till I can hire someone or find and dust off my old copy of CS6 to start making my own assets. (Inkscape drives me nuts and nobody made a PhotoGIMP-like option for illustrator yet)

    All the software I'm designing is deterministic and local first, LLMs and cloud dependencies as fallbacks or gap fillers. And nothing critical without a human to review, etc.

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    I remixed Claude's new buddy into "buddymon"

    github.com /CircuitForgeLLC/buddymon
  • I mean, electrically all of those things will just attenuate amplitude, not really effect signal oscillations, which is actually what sound is ...

    All they're doing is effectively adding a small resistance to the signal which will just lower the volume in effect. Adding any amplifier will fix that

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Thank you for the several new additions to my own list xD

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Great list! Why no kiwix? Seems right up your street

  • You read the commits before pushing, and test before committing. I also find it helpful to have a reference for any dev tickets you have in your git tracker

  • That joke was dangerously cheesy.... +1

  • Eyyyy this is one of the ones I use too!

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • My diagnosis is in that spike. I got diagnosed late because it took that long to get away from my autism denying parent and enough time living on my own to start wondering about my "weird habits", especially after starting to meet others "like me".

    It stopped being a disability in my mind and started being more like a superpower, and eventually out was just who I was and y'all can just deal with it. Of course I leaned boundaries and social graces because we live in a society, but how I view myself and other people definitely changed

    So I think it has a lot to do with how this generation and previous ones changed how they handle autism.

  • Home automation using geofencing, and my partner likes to get a notification when I'm heading home from the office

  • How is it less problematic? I've only ever worked with the other two

  • Anyone who uses Oracle DB or virtualbox in a corporate environment