Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P
Posts
2
Comments
1752
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Crazy Taxi (and Simpsons: Road Rage") were largely about driving poorly, crashing into things, and performing automobile jumps that would be considered suicidal if done for real. It was a fantasy driving game with the taxi business as the thinnest excuse to be driving. Unless I've drastically mistaken what Rideshare Simulator is, I don't think Crazy Taxi example is applicable.

    Fifteen years before Crazy Taxi, we had Space Taxi for the Commodore 64:

    I'd say Space Taxi and Crazy Taxi had equal amounts of relevance to the taxi industry in the sense that they were an excuse to fly/drive in fantasy settings instead of an actual business simulator.

  • I read the article just to confirm this wasn't a The Onion article. I understand there are games that simulate work like farming and even powerwashing. Even though I don't play those, I can mildly see the appeal as you're creating something (farming) or making something better than it was before (powerwashing). However, I see zero appeal for a game that simulates gig work like ridesharing. Can someone explain it to me, or have I reach a pivotal "too old" moment in my life?

  • Any chance you could get licensed in another state using what you know (without an apprenticeship) then seek licensing in your own state via some kind of reciprocity agreement with your home state?

  • "There is a two raspberry fee for making withdraws from this ATM. Do you want to continue?"

  • Mike Lindell, the lumpy pillow salesman....

  • Making a statement to gain something, then completely contradicting it later on to gain something additional even if it makes them a hypocrite? That's the trump way. If anything trump should be proud this candidate is copying his playbook so closely.

    However, voters should also recognize that any campaign promises from this candidate have an expiry date of the day of election. If this candidate were to get into office, they'd throw out anything that got them there and switch to a completely self serving agenda. Its the modern GOP way.

  • We do lots of things wrong here, but our power bill is based on usage. If you only use this much, this is your rate and the more you use the higher your rate goes.

    At the residential level that can exist too in the USA, but its not nearly that simple here in the USA, and I doubt its entirely that simple in your country either. Electricity isn't like a tank of fuel that is drawn down and refilled. Besides maintaining the infrastructure for generation and delivery, electrical capacity at any given moment has to be built into the system, not just pure total consumption over time. So simply paying for electricity consumed doesn't capture all of those costs in the system to make that electricity consumption possible to the consumer.

    Commercial/Industrial customers in the USA don't just pay for "amount consumed" but also "demand charges" which means "at any given point how much electricity will you be pulling from the grid?". Its not uncommon that the demand charges for businesses can be larger than the charges for amount of electricity consumed. Additionally, some European governments give large breaks in electricity rates to incentivize certain industries. Germany for example gives 50% discounts on electricity for chemical production, glass producers, or semiconductor producers if those companies invest in decarbonization efforts.

    Many European commercial/industrial electricity consumers have variations on what I described above in addition to wholesale electricity purchases for a given period which also breaks away from your described "pay for what you use with higher rates for more consumption".

    Can I ask you what country you're in (or another country that you know uses your country's same system)?

  • No I wasn’t suggested it be forced or companies be nationalized.

    My mistake then. So in your proposed system private companies would continue to exist.

    I was saying governments could provide incentives and support for workers to form worker owned companies.

    If that's the case, I'll go back to my first statement then. Tech workers will likely choose the higher risk but higher reward private company rather than one that my only have a modest return. If the private companies exist along side the co-ops, the boom and bust cycles will still exist except the co-ops won't be the beneficiary, but will certainly be on the losing side of cycles.

  • In order to transition to worker owned companies, it would be difficult as you mention, but governments could provide financial to help to get worker owned companies started.

    Hang on. You're proposing seizure of existing private companies and forcing the creation of the worker co-ops? Thats a very different thing. Should I assume your system would ban future private companies then?

    I wouldn't agree either of those approaches. Choice is important. Forcing people into co-ops because you think its better for them isn't a system I'm interested in being inside.

  • Tech work can be highly volatile in the business environment. Maybe its different for new tech workers entering the work force, but for a worker owned company, this can mean large losses of revenue for months. I don't know many tech workers that are willing to take a massive pay cut to continue to stay and commit to a worker owned company if they personally can find better paying work elsewhere.

    From the article:

    "The playful atmosphere of tech offices flush with investment, enjoying luxe catered lunches to attract programming talent, has been replaced by a looming fear that layoffs are just around the corner "

    This boom-and-bust cycle of tech growth and devastation has happened three times during my IT career. Its even more frequent in specific IT niche industries.

  • Watching Breaking Bad was an amazing experience that I would recommend everyone do once. However, I don't think I can ever take that full ride again. It just has too many people being so horrible to themselves and each other.

  • Runner up: The Wire

    "You follow drugs, you get drug addicts and drug dealers. But you start to follow the money, and you don't know where the fuck it's gonna take you."

  • “Looking back, I probably wouldn't do it again because I don't want to bring that kind of scrutiny on my friends or anything else like that,” Slusser said.

    Let me translate from GOP-speak: "I still truly believe he should be hanged, but I don't like the personal consequences and public outrage at me for saying something so obviously obscene."

    “Anyone with common sense knows the remark wasn't a literal call for public execution,”

    "It was just a prank, bro" - Slusser probably

  • Nobody believed the Olympian damaged the pool. Headlines about the pool falling apart after trumps botched work were circulating for weeks before the Olympian came on the scene. The trump administration is trying to instill a chilling effect that trump cannot be questioned or you will be prosecuted, even if its on false charges. The trump administration knows the charges won't still. They just want to cost regular Americans money and time they don't have as punishment for making trump look bad.

  • Absolutely! People are always wondering "how do you get experience in X?". The answer is "be the person that volunteers to research and implement it". Multiple times in my career I've done this and I took that knowledge and experience and got a better higher paying job from it. Rinse repeat.

    If your employer is going to pay you to learn a skill or product that will make you more valuable, if you turn that down you're passing up an opportunity to advance. That advancement just may not be at that employer.

    Or a more cynical version of this is "make your mistakes in learning at your current employer and if your efforts are not rewarded, take that knowledge and experience elsewhere for higher pay".

  • Knowing that one if us will be without the other when one of us eventually dies first at some unknown point in the future hopefully from old age. It certainly beats the alternative though of not having met and fallen in love.

  • "We're like a family here, in the sense that you'll wear my mark literally on your skin for the rest of your life even long after I'm dead. We also do a pizza party in the office ever other Friday. So that's fun!"

  • I had a half written post responding to what you wrote before I realized just how far off we are from one another in both ideology and tone. Clearly I've deleted all of it. I feel sorry for you, but worse, I feel bad knowing the damage your actions will have on your cause and that of my family. Still, I wish you good luck in life and hope you don't end up regretting your choices of who you vote for.

    Feel free to respond to my final post to you if you like if you want to put a coda on this thread for others, but I'll never see it.

  • Again, you’re stuck in binary short term thinking. I need to be more long term and strategic than you do.

    I have a trans family member. I am personally invested in their rights as a person be respected.

    And yes, transphobic DNC candidates losing makes the party less transphobic in the long run.

    We disagree completely. Up until 2 years ago I think we would agree that the DNC, for the most part, supported trans rights. When did we start seeing a handful of DNC candidates shifting on this position? When the candidates winning elections, the GOP, went transphobic. So the DNC losing more elections won't make them less transphobic, it will make them more. We've seen this in real time in the last 2 years.

    (Please don’t put words in my mouth and pretend I’m saying that means it’s a net positive that Trump won. You’re better than that.)

    WTF. Its a good thing I never said anything of the sort. I don't even think you need me in this conversation when you're the one putting words in my mouth, and then criticizing me for it.

    And frankly, if both parties turn transphobe, this whole country can burn to the ground as far as I care.

    You are the one advocating for the GOP and voting for GOP candidates directly opposed to trans rights. You are directly hurting my trans sister. You are the person with the torch setting fire to the country.