Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N
Posts
0
Comments
94
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Ah, okay, fair enough. Shit happens

  • You're the only one talking about this. A change can occur without any surgery. Reread the article to understand better, please.

    You read the article and you even quoted it. It says how xx people can be men and how xy people can be women. Nobody said anything about any surgery or magic pill that grows a penis or whatever you're imagining.

  • No, not magically, no. You're right.

  • This article seems to disagree. But I don't know much on the subject so I might be misunderstanding.

    Also, no matter what the correct answer is, pretending the answer is binary is definitely wrong. Since it's obviously a lot more complicated.

  • A person’s biological sex usually refers to their status as female or male depending on their chromosomes, reproductive organs, and other characteristics. Chromosomes are tightly packed DNA, or molecules that contain the genetic instructions for the development and functioning of all living things. Humans typically have forty-six chromosomes. Two of those are sex chromosomes that contain instructions for the development and functioning of characteristics related to biological sex, such as reproductive organs. There are two kinds of human sex chromosomes, X and Y. Individuals identified as males tend to have one X and one Y chromosome, while those identified as females tend to have two X chromosomes. However, other people are born with other chromosome combinations, such as XXY, that lead them to develop a mix of characteristics. People who fit that description are often referred to as intersex, a category for people whose bodies do not conform with stereotypical expectations of males or females at birth.

    Taken from here

    Evidence seems pretty strong to me.

  • Depends.. did it contain rhoa meat or blue zanthimum? If not, you've been rubed

  • Grazed thigh. So most likely learned nothing and will discipline the dog instead.

  • Hey, so I've got no horse in this race and also not a native English speaker so please bear with me.

    To me the op's statement sounds ironic, but not really a projection. According to google, to project is to unconsciously attribute your thoughts/feelings onto someone else. Like if you're having an argument and you're losing and as a self defense you claim that the other party is angry and or unreasonable or whatever.

    In this case the cybertruck owner says the guy shaming him should be shamed. He doesn't realise that it's him who should feel shame, so it's ironic.

    Am I missing something? Or was it all just some joke and I'm just overthinking it?

    Or is the guy being downvoted because he's being an ass, not because he's wrong?

  • Have we read the same article? Because that article simply claims that Romanians have an air of superiority and that it was a banal drawing and then lists a bunch of reactions from some Romanians and also brings up the fact that Halep is of aromanian descent, despite it being irrelevant. Unless they think aromanians and the romani are the same people, which they're not. Sounds unapologetic and no explanation given for the reinforcement of the romanians = gypsies stereotype.

    They could've at least framed it as a "le monde" title or something to imply that it's the media framing her as such.. there's nothing there to imply those are other people's words..

    So I can make a comic of Obama with some fried chicken and some watermelon at a desk with a plaque that says POTUS and just be like "it's a joke! I'm making fun of the racists!" ? That doesn't sound right to me, but whatever.

  • What was the satire here, then? How is portraying her as a gypsy anything but racist?

  • Man, I'm so sad about the warcraft movie.. partly because I agree with you and I think it was pretty good and it deserved sequels but also partly because it feels like it could've been better? Felt a bit hard to follow at times, and I remember reading some of Duncan Jones' tweets that implied the final cut wasn't his decision and that there was quite a bit of footage left out. Shame... They should try a tv series.

  • Water

    Jump
  • No, there can be only 1.

  • That's not how facts and opinions work, I'm sorry. Good luck!

  • Again, yes really. I'm sorry you're offended, but that's just how some things are. When you don't understand something, it's not because you're stupid, it's because you haven't tried to understand it. And you've literally admitted to not trying to understand outer wilds.

    And that's that. It's fine, you don't have to. But every thing you think you know or feel about it is made up, since you've never actually experienced it. Imagine going on Google maps and rating some place you've never been to. Or those people that give ratings to books and movies that aren't out yet. That's you in this situation. And well.. now THAT is something I'll never understand.

  • Yes, really. There's an exception to literally every single rule. And this game was an exception to many people's rules. Could be yours too. You won't know until you experience it. You can pretend you know what it is all you want meanwhile, but that's all it is, pretending.

  • Looks? So you've never played it? Then you can't comment. Only way to actually get it is to play it or at least watch someone play it blindly.

  • I guess they don't consider it bluesky defeating twitter if twitter is commiting suicide. Sounds like pedantry to me.

  • A currency for sure. Both crypto and not