Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N
Posts
2
Comments
458
Joined
3 yr. ago

I ran from Reddit, it be like that

  • Sure he will! *hugs

  • Buddy you’re still president. Get to work.

  • That’s more Gardener Gilbert, or Peter Powerwasher, but yes indeed

  • I always wondered why too; maybe they think it’s “gay”? Or possibly playing Fireman Sam or something?

  • It’s an existing meme, I believe originally from right wing dumbf*ks but nicely fitting for this occasion. He had 4 years to make something out of it, he didn’t do bad at all but this is a bit of a silly statement.

  • No

  • FWIW, you do not seem interested in an honest discussion, merely arguing in bad faith or trolling.

  • Yes, but solar cells are in the end very simple products made of very simple resources, with a limited task: concerting one type of energy into another. That said, there is still research in making them more efficient and cheaper, and the that research isn’t cheap.But generative AI / LLM takes an insane amount of resources to train and maintain, is complex to create, with a very complex task, and a slight increase in quality takes progressively more resources (like, say 10% better would be 50% more energy use - I don’t have the numbers anymore but iirc they were even worse). A better LLM would therefore be much, much more expensive while people are apparently already underwhelmed with the latest models. With the growing competition, fast rising costs and meagre quality updates, while already unable to financially sustain themselves right now, I truly don’t see it. Honestly, this is why I think Microsoft is cramming their subpar Copilot into everything - to sort of justify all the money they pumped into this.

  • I am honestly very very curious: how?

  • Hahaha. April 1st is early this year.They are never going to make enough money by selling licenses and subscriptions for the cost of their current models (smarter people than me have made good estimates), let alone the future ones. Those future models are at a much worse performance-cost ratio. Ads will at best bring in about 1 usd per user per month (estimated by Facebook revenue and number of users) - double or triple it just for lolz, and they would still be losing money.So… how will this be pulled off? Only wrong answers!

  • I’ll leave it as it is now, but you are probably right.

  • I ran an RD program years ago. Lots of bored and/or poor, greedy devs submitted metric shit tons of pseudo vulnerabilities (“if I do ctrl-u I can see source code on your web site!” No shit, Sherlock.). I can only imagine how much easier this has become with the help of generative ai…

  • I meant it’s all about security vulnerability submissions, and although not explicit in the article, those submissions are therefore very likely

    • meant to up the reputation for xz-like attacks
    • meant to annoy/bully the devs
    • denial of service by delaying triage and therefore delaying creating patches
    • submitted by boatloads in the hope of cashing in on bug bounties
  • I agree, it isn’t a great tactic, but with enough attempts you’ll probably hit a few times.

  • Agreed, but also: if it works and is merged, you get credited, and your Github account gets a better reputation. This makes it easier to deploy attacks like xz as you have a track record of merges.Also, plain vandalism, because people are like that.

    Edit: probably also bug bounty attempts. If you’ve ever been on the receiving side of a Responsible Disclosure program , you’ll know what I mean.

    Edit edit: it’s all in the article, darnit. Sorry.

  • One standing ovation for you!

  • Hard disagree: anything is a target for criminals like the NSO Group; blaming Whatsapp specifically for this muddies the discussion. Sure, you should avoid it - for other reasons, do a proper risk assessment please.