Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
0
Comments
402
Joined
3 yr. ago

If you're snooping here, you gotta calm yourself down.

  • I didn't realize being anti Putin meant he had to love liberalism.

  • I haven't tried the meal planner side of things yet but this has been a great app for managing my favorite recipes.

  • Ok few things..

    He talks about working 22 hours over a few days like that's a lot. I'm betting you and I have worked 24 hours over the last 3 days and none of us are bitching about the time we put in. And we don't get vacations half the year.

    and if you worked less than 3 days and put on this many hours and you're still this uninformed about things relevant to your job. Then you're not working, you're wasting time.

  • I like to buy a whole chicken and smoke it on the Weber. Usually eat a breast from it or a thigh, and do that with some fresh veggies. Sauteed green beans or roasted potatoes. I refrigerate the chicken then De-bone it and use the meat to make a chicken pot pie that I'll be able to have for lunch for like a week or more. I haven't bought a frozen pot pie since.

  • Computer programs don't inherently remove bias. If anything, they obfuscate it. We wouldn't have less gerrymandering from a computer program, we'd have more. We could require absolutely open and transparent code and data, and that still wouldn't be enough because the manipulations would be performed right in the open for everyone to see, but it would be 'okay' because it's not illegal. Much like our current system allows for gerrymandering for political purposes, this wouldn't address the issue, it would just make hiding and obfuscating the reasoning easier.

    And as for electing supreme Court judges, if you thought presidential elections and political ads were bad now, it would be 100 times worse if we have to put up with political ads for judges on top of that. It would put more money in politics which is absolutely the wrong direction to go. We need a bigger, more representative supreme Court. We need more courts in general, and more judges to get through the cases that are already in the backlog. Your proposals would exacerbate our existing issues, not help us.

  • In the same vein, you're all over this thread exclusively shitting on boomers and ignoring all other possibilities.

    Looks like Astro turfing to me.

  • Which part do you think was a lie? Half of all boomers being broke, or the rich being the problem?

  • Couldn't possibly be that only boomers would answer the phone. Because you know those younger generations are totally known for answering calls from unknown numbers and participating in surveys.

  • Well I can tell you for sure it wasn't only boomers that voted for them.

    I'm just trying to emphasize that this is a class war, not a generational war.

  • Nearly half of boomers have no retirement savings. Blame them all you want, but the problem is the rich. Always has been. Always will be.

  • Centrist Democrats are intentionally being obtuse about this because they work for the same billionaires the Republicans work for.

  • You lose because you're weak and we fucking know it and we're fucking done with that weak ass shit.

  • What's the other side?

  • Oh, did he do something to undo all the damage?

  • He was already part of that club before the trillion. You're not giving the entrenched money enough credit.

  • Fuck his supporters too.

  • They're at the tip of the K

  • Please. You armchair warriors all say the same shit like your so sanctimonious. It's not going to accomplish anything. You live in the same world we all live in. But go on, make it seem like me, some random guy in the comments of a lemmy thread, had any agency in what the president did before I could even vote.

    I bet we could go back and forth asking each other what we consider to be war crimes and we wouldn't agree on half of it. I get the feeling that you're not interested in actually having a discussion about war crimes, more so you're just interested on shitting on anybody but the current president. So fuck off with your 2 week old Smurf account.

    I'm gonna go have fun with my family now. You keep raging at the machine.