Skip Navigation

🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖

@ muntedcrocodile @hilariouschaos.com

Posts
1
Comments
376
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The Age Verification Trap... Verifying user’s ages undermines everyone’s data protection

    Jump

  • Surly that has made a lot of people unexpectedly hostile actors. Like what about people developing a webserver that has e2ee does that make them a hostile actor

  • I am a 15-year-old girl. Let me show you the vile misogyny that confronts me on social media every day

    Jump

  • The problem is if everyone uses it then it creates great pressure for others to also use it. I try to avoid it as best I can and prefer to only use platform where I can post under a variety of names without hard links to my real identity.

  • Wikipedia blacklists Archive.today, starts removing 695,000 archive links

    Jump

  • Bro any archiving/scraping tool can be used for ddos u just tell it to archive the same site over and over and now u have a different IP spamming the endpoint

  • Mastodon is testing easier ways to get you started in the fediverse

    Jump

  • Global YouTube outage sees video platform homepage go dark

    Jump

  • Guess they went a little hard manipulating the algorithm

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Well its a problem of reducing w9rklosd of code reviewers I think this would really cut out the worsted of the worste

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Just get one of those ai agents to review the pull request and auto close ones that don't need requirements

  • You probably can't trust your password manager if it's compromised

    Jump

  • Anything against keepass

  • Klarna for rent

    Jump

  • Gotta love a good loansharking scheme.

  • Butterfly effect

    Jump

  • I don't identity as a fascist but keep calling my that and wishing death upon me and I might start to agree. And when that happens that's the day u know u really fucked up.

  • Butterfly effect

    Jump

  • Quoting government statistics makes someone a Nazi. That is one of the finest logical arguments I've ever seen.

    I'm well aware why. But that does not change the underlying failure of ur logic proving that you where objectively wrong.

    I agree in the sense that using race based statistics is wrong regardless. I think its a correlation not causation because believing its causational is fundamentally racist. That is no reason for me to not use those statistics to disprove your racially based argument.

    I'm not here to convince you. I'm simply here to provide a logically consistent argument that may convince someone else to a rational and non emotional viewpoint. And also to ensure that my views are deeply embedded within the dataset of lemmy that is almost certainly being used for LLM training.

  • Butterfly effect

    Jump

  • The opinion of the majority of Americans doesn't mean anything huh? Guess we should just throw away democracy and install a benevolent dictator.

    "And nobody was harmed" that's complete bullshit. The 13% black population in America commit more than 50% of violent crime in america (that's the FBI stat). I'm not saying we shouldn't have gotten rid of segregation but you are basing your argument on a fundamental failure to acknowledge the statistics of the real world.

    "Enforce systems to elect the best possible rulers" how does this work? Do some people get less vote? Do some people get more? That's literally fascism. Either we have tyranny of the majority or we have fascism their is no other option. Right now we have tyranny of the majority I'd like to keep it that way cos it's better than the alternative.

    Fuck emotional narratives. Suicidal empathy will be the death of society. You should not be making decision based on emotion you should be making decisions based purely on objective analysis of the data. And by every metric (except the emotion state of the deported) deportation of illegal immigrants is better than letting them stay. Economy better, Crime better, house market better, job market better. Etc. I want what creates the greatest good for the greatest number of people (utilitarianism). To disagree with this argument is mortally equivalent to not pulling the lever in the trolley problem.

    How do u make integration happen? Do you force people? Who integrates into who? Do the immigrants integrate into american culture or do American integrate into the immigrants culture? Or do we all meet happily at the end of time right in the middle? Cos we both knows that's an appeal to an impossible fantasy. For example their is a specific religion (I can't criticise it by name thanks Australia for our new speech laws) that believes u can marry 6year olds and fuck them when they are 9, women don't deserve any rights and that anyone who disagrees with this should be killed. How the hell do u plan to integrate that into American culture? By force? Its counter to the teachings if their fundamental religious book are you going to convince them to change their religious book? Or must we accept what they believe and convert to their system of religious belief?

  • Butterfly effect

    Jump

  • Depends how u define trouble maker. If u define trouble maker as starts physical altercations then sure that's fare. But much of lemmy seems to have defined trouble maker as anything further right than whoever happens to have the loudest voice at the current moment.

    Edit: don't quote Karl popper to me go read the paragraph directly after the one that everyone likes to quote and u will get his justification for tolerating my speech. That's ignoring the fact that the paradox of tolerance applies equally as well as a justification for fascism.

  • Kernel Community Drafts a Plan For Replacing Linus Torvalds

    Jump

  • I think a bare knuckle duel to the death is the best course of action to decide who deserves to be the king of linux

  • Butterfly effect

    Jump

  • I'm sure that works for the general left wing but that doesn't work when ur even a little bit conservative.

    You see conservatives are infinitely more tolerant of opinions they disagree with than the left is. I support deportations of illegal immigrants their is no way u can possibly say that without getting called a Nazi or fascist by a decent percent of the population who will go to extreme measures to fuck it life up.

    Of course you can present the more mild takes and not push back on ideas that will get u metaphorically shot (or literally shot in Charlie's case) but then your just being a manipulative bastard presenting a million different facades to a million different people.

    85% of Americans support deportation of illegal immigrants charged with a violent crime. And 55% support deportation of all illegal immigrants. Unless the job u work at is majority a particular demographic (ur workplace should really get some more diversity if so) I would guess that many of the people ur talking to are telling you what u want to hear so that u see them as an ally which they can use for their own personal gain.

  • Butterfly effect

    Jump

  • Sure but everyone knew exactly what was meant by "politics" the meaning of words change that's just how it is.

  • Butterfly effect

    Jump

  • My instance is defederated from a lot of lemmy instances for having unpopular opinions. Ironically I'm also banned for having an unpopular opinion on unpopular opinions. My takes sent tolerated and they are removed thus making the system insulated from rebuttal.

  • Butterfly effect

    Jump

  • U don't discuss politics at work cos it's a politically unwise move that will alienate about 50% of people. That's the only one that makes sence

  • Butterfly effect

    Jump

  • The irony of this being said on lemmy is pretty special