Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
10
Comments
26
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I use this once a month. Is this the sort of thing you mean? Or is there some other sort of thing you are talking about?

  • I have deep respect for my colleagues who put stickers on the walls at work.

  • I just spent three weeks getting work to whitelist uv 😭😭😭

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Vaultwarden security update Feb 10 2026

    github.com /dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.35.3
  • As someone runnings things out of my basement computers, i have a lot of problems with my hosting provider

  • Programmer Humor @programming.dev

    Co-pilot bicycle

  • "living off of your property" is shorthand (and so maybe we should be more explicit) for "living off of the production and labor of other people who need access to your property to do that labor".

    So yea, i think it is exploitative to restrict access your property to someone who would use it to reproduce themselves each day (a home) or would use it to produce other valuable goods and services (a job) and to require that person to pay you for access (that home again) or you'll pay them wages less than what they produce (that job).

    And i think exploitative is inherently bad.

  • "I saw the gun he’s holding go from pointing up at the ceiling to sweeping down toward the room, and as it swept across me I said ‘Oh, my god,’ and I ducked down, but I still kept moving” said Mr. Lih, a digital strategist who works with museums and libraries.

    Saying you are going to shoot yourself and then pointing your gun at other people does not inspire confidence that those other people won't get shot.

  • Technology @lemmy.world

    The ESP32 "backdoor" that wasn't | Dark Mentor LLC

    darkmentor.com /blog/esp32_non-backdoor/
  • Ooo, interesting.

    I am going for public access here, so it wont work. But i think this is how some routers are set up. Like i think asusrouter.net is set to 192.168.0.1, so anyone with the router can go to the same url / domain and itll send them each to their own router. Found that out the other week and thought it very clever.

  • So i had done this (with Adguard rather than pihole) and i think i was getting caching issues. Whether or not i was, though, i removed it and it looks like my router is handling it all just fine without the rewrite on the local DNS server.

    Some folks mentioned "hairpin NAT" - i was reading the wiki on NAT last night but didnt get to hairpin, but that appears to be what is happening.

    The conclusion is - my setup had been doing what i want the whole time without any DNS fiddling. I updated the original post with the speedtests.

  • I guess I should say that I think there were caching issues, but the problem was coming from an iphone and the Bitwarden app (connecting to the self-hosted vaultwarden).

  • i think this is what I was doing with Adguard and using the re-write rules, but then the client (my phone, for example) would cache the IP address and it would fail when I was out of the house/network.

    Or am I misunderstanding what you are saying here?

  • ok, well that's easy to set up if that is how it just works! i wonder if maybe i should (at least temporarily) self-host some sort of speedtest app on the server and check the speed from my phone while i'm on wifi using the IP, wifi using domain name, and off wifi using domain...

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    How do I use public URLs but route within my home network?

  • I asked a very good, thoughtful question yesterday and within 5 minutes got a downvote with no comment or explanation or feedback as to why. Ive got around 3k rep, not while im not a poweruser or whatever i aint new to it.

    Glad other people engaged with it productively, but yea was a real "this is what people have been talking about"

  • I turned off QoS and immediately am getting 930 on speedtest.net from the desktop browser!

    Also, very helpful to know Issue 1 here. I assumed that the router would be the best spot to test since it is farthest upstream (other than the modem). I didn't know it could pass traffic faster than it can decode, but that makes sense that people would have tried to make that the case. The router is still getting ~500 Mbps while the browser is much closer to the full 1000.

  • that makes sense, and I'm looking now. However, the only thing that has anything other than zero in the 'Real-time rate' on the router is the computer i'm typing this on, which is at ~30KB/s up and down

  • I've got a coax cable (not fiber) coming into the house, in the USA. My understanding is that there is some amount of shared network with the neighbors.

  • That is the correct question, and mostly no, I don't have any specific problem.

    The biggest motivator for me looking at it is probably just hobby/interest/how-does-this-work.

    That said, my partner and I both work from home ~50% and are often pulling files/data that are a couple GB from the work network, and having those go faster would be nice. Probably the limiting factor in those, though, is the upload from the work network and so faster download for us likely wouldn't matter, but I'd like to be able to say "I looked into it, honey."

  • Technology @lemmy.world

    How to properly test my internet speed from ISP?

  • "DO NOT EVER TURN THIS SERVER OFF - CALL RON" is very good

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Store (and access) old emails

  • Programming @programming.dev

    Real examples here?