i think climate would be one of the the biggest & obvious un-modifiable factor.if solo camping, then somewhere warm but not prone to extreme deadly heat spikes.assuming the west is undeveloped and rugged, then probably that. (based on the premise that the eastern half is overcrowded AND thats a bad thing(?))i would try to hit exurbs but be nearby civilization. else.. just be inside a city or near a friendly town.its extremely complicated to forsee from an armchair. would require testing,optionality, and careful decisionmaking(and research&valid+complete_data), plus low-stake trial&error(also risk assesment, risk mitigation, safety procedures).
- Posts
- 4
- Comments
- 75
- Joined
- 7 yr. ago
- Posts
- 4
- Comments
- 75
- Joined
- 7 yr. ago
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
the article seems pretty partisan and populist. selectively chooses facts for discredit while omitting any admission of credibility. does not address the problems or issues with a proposed solution. lots of suspicion, unfair assumptions about motives, and irrelevantly keeps tieing back to the trump administration. the highly partisan angle seems to discredit arstechnica as an intelligent unpreferential information source for productive discussion.