Skip Navigation

Posts
11
Comments
747
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I'd say the downfall first started around the time 24-hour cable news came along (starting in 1980 but it didn't happen right away) along with things like the abolishing of the fairness doctrine (1987). That and the need to fill 24 hours with "news" led to the shift to more op-ed content than news. More and more of these opinion news cable channels followed.

    Then the deterioration really began to snowball with the internet and proliferation of "news" outlets tailored for specific audiences, culminating with the rise of social media (I mean, what hasn't been negatively affected by the rise of social media/oligarch-owned web 2.0) and the purchasing of all media outlets, including newspapers, by corporations and later by the rising oligarchs.

    All this meant the "news" became just another type of profit-driven enterprise, with a need to compete for ratings, that shifted it from hard news to entertainment and nothing more than parroting of press releases with no independent investigation. Ultimately leading to the demise of the last bastion of independence, print journalism.

    That doesn't mean there aren't still some journalists doing good investigative work, just that they are pretty much on their own now. I don't know much about Meidas Touch, but if they're actually out there asking questions and reporting, instead of just sitting around spouting opinions and outrage like most political podcasts, that's a good thing.

  • If we had a free independent press any more, all reputable news outlets would be writing about this every single day to apply pressure for proof of consciousness, so they can't drag this out until the deadline.

    They would demand that his office, which released a statement saying "The Senator continues to improve, and is working closely with his staff on Kentucky and Senate matters while the Senate is out of session”, prove that they weren't outright LYING.

    They would go around asking his spokespeople to answer questions on camera and hound them, "is McConnell conscious?", "Will you release a photo of him with his eyes open?", "Why did his wife go to Beijing?" etc etc.

    But they won't. Because we don't have a free independent press any more. A few journalists will speculate. None will keep demanding answers until they get them. Just the talking heads speculating.

  • Should have thought of that back when Platner's giant red flags were first flown, i.e. from the beginning of his run, when there was still plenty of time to find a better candidate. But no, he had the charisma to suck everyone in, so it was deny, delay, and defend, up to now at the last minute when the evidence has, as it obviously and inevitably would, piled up to undeniable level and everyone is screwed again. smh. He can't win now no matter what.

  • Aaaaaaaand .... Trump just dumped on the whole tournament and put the US team in a worse position than they already were with the bad red card call. If they win now, the win is tainted by controversy and the corrupt stain of Shitfinger. The only way for the team to save face would be to keep him off the field for the game anyway, which would also piss people off. It's a lose-lose situation and will probably impact the team's play as well.

  • On Thursday, McConnell's office told Newsweek via email, “Senator McConnell appreciates the outpouring of support he’s receiving while he continues his recovery in the hospital. The Senator continues to improve, and is working closely with his staff on Kentucky and Senate matters while the Senate is out of session.”

    Translation:

    On Thursday, McConnell's office told Newsweek via email, “[We believe that] Senator McConnell [would, if he were conscious and aware,] appreciate the outpouring of support he’s receiving while he continues his recovery in the hospital. The Senator continues to improve [not be dead, technically], and is working closely with his [ICU medical] staff on Kentucky and Senate [respiration] matters while the Senate [brain] is out of session.”

  • Because of her ingrained belief system, brainwashed into her mind since childhood, she absolutely cannot face the fact/admit to herself that she actually had an abortion. Yes, it was objectively and truly an actual abortion.

    Assuming that like most evangelicals her belief is that life begins at conception, to admit that she had an abortion would be to admit that she herself is what she accuses other women who have abortions to be: immoral sluts who murder children as their birth control method of choice. She would also have to acknowledge that by her actions she has caused immense pain and suffering, even death in some cases, to other women.

  • Neocities and such are still non-fediverse platforms, and the users would still have to know how to do html and set up a website.

    The idea was that since Mastodon already has the ability to store your micro-blog posts, as well as images and clips (and has a media button to view the posts that contain them), that it would be convenient for users to also be able to store a few articles or documents as well.

    I suppose to make it simpler, these other types of files could also just be attachments to posts the way media files are, and there could be a button to view the posts containing them as well. That would be a lot simpler to implement than my idea, but it would be harder for others to find them and for the user to organize and present them.

  • Something like a Mastodon+ where besides hosting just our microblog posts, each account would also have a modest amount of storage (maybe just 1 GB or even less) for a personal mini-website as part of our profile, where we could have other content in a more stable place for people to access-- for example essays, tutorials, reference info, fiction/poetry, pdfs for download, whatever someone might want to make available that isn't just a temporary toot that quickly scrolls away into the sunset.

    The account profile would have a link that opens to a personal "home page" which is just a list of links to the various files (with room for description text for each link).

    For the user there could be a settings page with a template to enter "Description: link" lines for each piece of content, and buttons to upload/manage the content files. Preferably the content pages would be in markdown format and would be rendered for the browser like the way github does with readme files. That way users wouldn't have to know how to do HTML.

    This idea is because getting a domain, learning html, and creating a website is just not something most people can or want to deal with, but would still like to be able to have a place to put some of their stuff online. Another possible option might be ability to specify whether the personal mini-website is available to public, instance members, followers only, or mutuals only.

  • Why not both? Yikes.

  • Sounds more like she thinks the person her preferred candidate lost to is a scumbag and she wants to make sure he doesn't win, so will vote for his opponent. Not an uncommon way that people decide who to vote for, but as you say, not a sign of an ideological shift.

  • I remember back in the early web days I was trying to make a post on a forum with something about Dick Van Dyke, getting a double-whammy name block. He already unfamiliar to the younger people even back then, so none of my attempts to explain who I was talking about worked. I couldn't even say what show he starred in for them to look up, since it was also called The Dick van Dyke Show.

  • I think it must have started back when Twitter first came out and tweets could only have 140 characters, so posting an image of text allowed people to have longer amounts of text. Just a guess.

    But since then, I don't know. I hate it too! It's so stupid.

  • It would be much more effective if he "took over" Israel instead of Iran, since the "agreement" stipulates that it is dependent on Israel stopping its attacks on Lebanon.

  • Since it's a safe R district, as long as he's not there voting it's a good deal.

  • "He's not even a Democrat"

    As they used to say when I was a kid: "Takes one to know one!"

  • I know you can do it from mastodon, so I suppose you could also do it from lemmy. For example if I want to comment on a peertube video (without having an account on the peertube instance), I just paste the url of the video into my mastodon account's search bar which brings it up in the results as a post, and from there I can Favorite it and/or reply to it. The fav adds 1 to the likes and the reply appears as a comment on the video.

    Also from that post I can click on the profile and then Follow so all their video posts from then on will show up in my timeline.

  • "But the water's clean".

    Many years ago when a friend and I stopped at a rest stop and the sinks looked dirty. I said, "It's not very clean", they said that. Now for some reason it still pops into my head any time I wash my hands in a public restroom. Whyyyyyyyyyy.

  • "And you’re ignoring the reality that a ton of stuff going on in your mind isn’t conscious at all, ...."

    Yes, I was ignoring that aspect because the subject was about consciousness. Of course that doesn't mean the the subconscious isn't also operating from a mental model or process, just because we're not consciously aware of it.

    "First and foremost, consciousness requires a model of self, but that’s not required at all, ..."

    I didn't say a model of self was required, but just some kind of mental model--which is probably not the best way of putting it but I don't know all the proper scientific terminology. Maybe it is, if you define consciousness as being aware of what is "self" vs. what is "not-self". I'm not sure it is, at least in the simplest cases.

    "... trees and other plants are clear examples of living beings that have no mental model at all. But, they have sensory input and reactions."

    Plants (or at least the part of the plant being affected) can react to a stimulus, but I think that can easily be explained as happening through a mechanical and/or chemical reaction locally. I wouldn't call that kind of stimulus a "sensory input". If it was, then what would the sense organ or means of receiving or transmitting the sensory input be, and what would it be that receives or processes the input? There's no nervous system or comparable structure.

    Anyway no one can even define what consciousness really is. I just thought the comic's view of consciousness was oddly specific and highly unlikely.

  • Yes, they've been wanting to do it for many years, even before 9/11 but especially after (remember "Total Information Awareness"?--back then the backlash stopped them, but now the populace has been mostly tamed and made compliant). So now with AI/LLM they have not only the perfect cover to build the datacenters but also the means to process all that data--never mind hallucinations, they're fine with that too.