Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L

lambalicious

@ lambalicious @lemmy.sdf.org

Posts
5
Comments
820
Joined
3 yr. ago

I write English / Escribo en Español.

Vidya / videojuegos. Internet. Cats / Gatos. Pizza. Nap / Siesta.

This user's posts under CC-BY-NC-SA license. Ask me if you need a different permission.

  • When your API client is just Excel with a ‘Send Request’ button

    Jump

  • It's considered Problematic because of the person involved I think. There are a few alternatives such as the Bluey one and the Calvin one, but they are fairly well hidden in eg.: memegenerator.

  • Why Flatpak Won and Snap and AppImage Didn't. - Cameron Knauff

    Jump

  • But what if it doesn't cover my specific usecase?

  • Rust Derangement Syndrome

    Jump

  • You are almost inspiring me to go see this live.

  • Rust Derangement Syndrome

    Jump

  • That's true, for now.

    Licenses might not matter now but if enough of a communal current for respect of licenses and of punishment for license breaking ramps up, we might be able to see something like (L)GPL class action suits against large corporations, at which point it becomes possible to at least seek reparation for previous damages.

    But as with anything and everything law-related, licenses are declarations of intent. Their validity is only substantiated by the holder's capacity to pursue punishment.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Reminder that text does not convey sarcasm. In this world where it's so wasy to cobble up a lie and spread it, it's important to denote properly what stuff is intended to be a joke, eg.: use the

    </sarcasm>

    or /s tag.

  • Rust Derangement Syndrome

    Jump

  • Partly it's more of "destroy an ecosystem". Among languages, Rust is at the frontlines of a continuing trend to remove GPL-licensed, community toolkits and put corporate-friendly, AI-friendly toolkits in their place, eg.: replacing grep with openaigrep, which would basically be step 2 in the process of privatizing or corporatizing the Linux ecosystem (and leads to the loss of a number of user freedoms).

  • Rust Derangement Syndrome

    Jump

  • Excuse me but, can Rust even give me undecipherable Lore Ipsums of diagnostics at the same level that C++ can? If not, it's not even a competition.

  • Rust Derangement Syndrome

    Jump

  • So it's not "Rust destroys Debian", it's "Rust destroys Linux"?

  • Installing Linux Just Got Easier (USBless install)

    Jump

  • New strat for migrating unattended laptops at the office just showed up!

  • Would you?

    Jump

  • Based zramctl. Makes my 8GB RAM system run like I had 12 GB, which is quite significant in this new internet world where opening a second tab in a web browser costs almost 600 MB.

  • the invisible touch

    Jump

  • That still exists? 👀

  • We live in the future!

    Jump

  • Thor's voice: "All money is made-up"

  • Linux in California is in deep trouble.

    Jump

  • You are suggesting an idea such as with this law Gentoo could extend their userbase to the entirely of California by mandate? Now THAT would be interesting...

  • ntfy.sh v2.18.0 was written by AI

    Jump

  • You could, in the meantime, simply not upgrade to the version that uses AI.

    Since, from what I'm seeing around, people are having issues looking for an alternative.

  • Lead Lemmy developer dessalines@lemmy.ml Appears to Have Had Their Account Compromised After Moderation Actions Raise Serious Concerns

    Jump

  • , but installing lemmy means supporting an authoritarian

    Have you ever transported yourself in a Ford, or derived, vehicle?

  • Lead Lemmy developer dessalines@lemmy.ml Appears to Have Had Their Account Compromised After Moderation Actions Raise Serious Concerns

    Jump

  • Piefed is known to incorporate CCP-style shadow profile and similar measures, such as "Social Credit", so it'd be hilarious to complain about l.ml's alignment to then migrate to piefed of all places.

  • archive.today is directing a DDOS attack against my blog (and more)

    Jump

  • Blah blah woof woof internet drama as usual. The functional question that remains (and that matters) is only one: which archive tool to use next that bypasses paywalls.

  • LTT does another Linux Challenge

    Jump

  • Let's not give attention to whiners and saboteurs like this. We all already know what's going on behind the curtains, and we all can tell that this video is being done in bad faith.

  • Brazilian Federal Police can reportedly reverse WhatsApp's "view once" messages

    Jump

  • (does android/iOS even have a way to do this?)

    I'm a bit out of the loop by my last understanding (dated ca. 2021-ish) is it shouldn't matter at that level. If Whatsapp is any like Signal in what comes to storing the history of conversations, this is done in a live database file (SQLite or similar), at which point you only need to modify or delete the record within the file's data tables. I'd be going over the way the extraction is described:

    rather the result of extraction carried out by specific software that jointly displays the messages and files sent

    Note that this is about the device that sent the messages, not about the device that could in theory only see them once. I've never used view-once messages so I don't know the details of how do they work on the sender side, but I would expect that from the sender side they can not be reliably deleted or redacted before the sender can verify the receiver viewed them once (remote deletion notwithstanding).

    The only exfiltration points "from disk" that I can see from that perspective, would be:

    • the automatic weekly(?) backup which generates copies of the database in designated files, at which point the only backups that might contain the message as-is (without any sort of redaction) would be the ones dated before the receiver sent a "read receipt" notification;
    • the exports generated by the sending user via copy-paste, etc, by which point it's not a WA security model failure (the entire point of being able to export the data is being able to export the data);