Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)J

just_an_average_joe

@ just_an_average_joe @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts
0
Comments
123
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • sadge

    Jump

  • Am an average joe, and i also got banned via regex.

    So you are not thaat extremist, just an average joe level extremist

  • What's something you know about philosophy?

    Jump

  • That makes a lot of sense, thanks!

  • What's something you know about philosophy?

    Jump

  • Wouldn't that be structuralism? Ie the truth (category in this case) is defined by the relations an entity (penguin or sparrow) has with some other entity (the example bird) rather than something intrinsic to that entity

  • What's something you know about philosophy?

    Jump

  • Yeah, modernity was about things to be discovered and post-modernity was all about "everything is relative to social context"

  • What's something you know about philosophy?

    Jump

  • Wouldn't deontology and virtue ethics be same in your description? Like virtues are those moral laws? (I never took a philosophy course btw)

  • Autonomous AI Agent Hacked Hugging Face. Strict US Safety Guardrails Forced them to Use a Chinese LLM to Catch It—Expensive, Proprietary US Models Were No Help To Defenders, and Free Chinese Ones Were

    Jump

  • Soon huggingface.co will be blocked in USA as well. The government is looking to ban open weight models (acc to axios) in an attempt to stop people from using chinese models.

  • Reddit will require you to log in to use old.reddit.com

    Jump

  • What do they use? RSS? I always thought they used old.reddit

  • School shooting survivor sues AI gun detection firm after system failed to spot weapon

    Jump

  • Not quite right. These types of ideas have existed for quite some time and have been used many many times in warfare by US military+allies. This was one of the core things that necessiated a company like palantir.

    The only caveat is that, historically when these systems failed, it usually killed brown people which nobody really care about. Take the example of school bombing in iran or gaza genocide.

    The problem is that the tolerance for error in warfare is always very high, anything can be written as "collatoral". But even a small error (like one kid dying) is too much inside a state.

    That's why palantir in non military settings is disasterous.

    TLDR: AI did better than expected, the problem was that, a white kid in USA died rather than a brown one in a third world country.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • "They were god damn monsters" (said in arthur morgan's voice)

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • So thats why charles in rdr2 was so mad about some foreigners killing bisons. Never knew they were endangered (also im not an american)

  • What is the coolest website you’ve visited that no one knows about?

    Jump

  • What if they wrote it in english cuz ofcourse aliens have english to alienese translator.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I feel bad for making you frustrated. It wasn't my intention. I think these text based format just makes things weird for us. You sound like someone I could have had a nice conversation on this topic without frustrations if we were discussing IRL.

    For what its worth, my original intent was to discuss different approaches to distribution of labour rather than talking about hunter gatherer society. I have weird way of talking where i can't help but justify my reasoning, so hunters gatherer was the justification for different physiology. And different physiology was the setup for the discussion on distribution of labour.

    What I found strange about myself is that I (and so many others including you) believe in equal distribution of labour in household despite having different physiology. But I support proportional distribution of labour when it comes broader society ie rich and priviledge should contribute more than poor and underpriviledged.

    And I kinda find this strange about myself (also generally) that we have different views when looking at society versus household.

    If i make a claim that we can't know actual capability between a couple therefore equal distribution of labour is fair then a similar argument can be made about rich vs poor.

    Anyways, I have a bad habit of making everything too political, this is a meme community so maybe i need to dial down that political side of me.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Yes very true. Body language is super important in conversations like this.

    For me what felt strange is that, I am a propnent of sharing household responsibilities between men and women equally. So basically equality despite difference in capability. But then, when it comes to society in general, I don't believe in equal responsibility ie rich and privilegded ppl should have more responsibility than underprivileged. And this makes me feel like a hypocrite you know?

    On one example, I am thinking of equality and the other proportionality.

    I guess my idealogy is still incomplete.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Im not gonna continue further, already made too many people "angry". Somehow this convo became about humans being hunters and what not. And not the original conversation about dishes and dragons.

    My whole point was about women having different physiology than men. Please fight the scientists who are researching this, not me.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Yeeeeeaaaah, comments like this was exactly why i said sorry first. Help your partners folks!

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • This is the third paragraph from the article you provided "Researchers found the female body was better suited for endurance activity...."

    Which is what my explanation is based on

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Sorry to be like this but im sure an argument like this would be thrown your way if this was posted in a big enough room.

    Isn't this how we function evolutionarily? Like in a hunter and gatherers society, men were predominantly the ones required to do "one-hit" labour like hunting, whereas women were predominantly the ones doing "continual" labour like gathering food.

    This also reflects in our bodies in many ways like our risk tolerance and physiological stuff. There are 2 types of muscles in human body, one that are needed for quick one-off work and other that are good for continual work. And men have the "one-hit" type more and women the other type. Afaik, this also shows up in endurance training and strength training. Men are generally more capable in strength one, while women are more capable in endurance.

    So going by the principle of "to each acc to their capability, to each acc to their need", it would mean that women should do more of folding sheets while men should do more "dragon killing"

  • Reticulum Network

    Jump

  • Reticulum has built in support for sending or receiving data on multiple layers like internet bluetooth wife etc. Mestastic doesn't. Also meshtastic can be less resource efficient cuz it sends a lot of probing messages.

    Source: watched a youtube video once so i am not 100% sure about the second point

    Edit: lol, wifi not wife, but who know maybe wife can also forward messages from reticulum

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Isn't division of labour a capitalistic thing? That ultimately leads to alienation?