I interpreted this (incorrectly I now assume) to mean if you pay attention to billionares ruining the world instead of playing with a dog with a stick, you will be unhappy. Which, yes, this is true, but perhaps not the most important metric.
"Good" means different things in different contexts. Here you mean it as something like "user friendly". Of course, there are other priorities that someone else could call "good". It's not a helpful word for honest debate, but it's very convenient for hiding a bunch of semantic puns and confused reasoning behind.
He, and literally every other human in Middle Earth, not to mention every elf, dwarf, and maia, and presumably every ork, uruk-hai, trent, balrog, troll, and loreless abomination as well.
Coca-cola has notoriously spent buh-buh-buh-BILLIONS on nutritional research. They throw away the research that doesn't suit the science that they WANT to be true and promote the research that tends to support it. An example of a disproved hypothesis that has been accepted due to their meddling is "calories in, calories out."
NdGT will talk about ANY subject as though he was an expert. I'm kind of shocked he hasn't said anything stupid about trans people yet, but he sure has said a lot of stupid stuff.
Hell, dark matter isn't even a hypothesis, it's purely an observation! In that sense, you're right that it's not falsifiable, only interpretable. It is a reality like the temperature. We don't hypothesize that it is 21C, we observe it. We DIRECTLY OBSERVE gravity that does not come from any known source; that's "dark matter." Likewise, we directly observe red shift and other effects of inflation. We call the unknown cause of those observations "dark energy." Neither are a specific thing that people believe in, they are labels for the effects that we directly observe.
Casting that through some kind of quasi-religious lens and then attacking it as a crackpot beliefs is BIZARRE behavior.
It's like looking at a chimp with a revolver. How did they even get it? Who knows, but they're definitely gonna hurt someone.
A hypothesis is not a religion, dude. People (other than I suppose lay people with weirdly religious ideas) don't "believe in" dark matter or dark energy. These are fully falsifiable hypotheses just like Bernoulli's principle (since you reference aerodynamics). Cosmology is fully falsifiable and hypotheses are overturned all the time. CMB was predicted to exist before it was found and matched predictions, based on observations that lead to the Hubble constant, etc. The history of cosmological theory is easily available for you, if you cared to learn about it.
Meanwhile, you ARE approaching these ideas religiously. You reject them because you "don't believe in them." That's bonkers. You don't need to accept or reject them on an emotional level. That's not how any of this works.
I hope you're just a smart kid goofing around and riffing, and not someone who actually believes their own bullshit.
Cats are not social animals. They do not need companionship the way humans and other social animals do. If your cats don't like each other and you know a good home, consider moving one. It's a very small way you could put your slave's needs over your desires.
I interpreted this (incorrectly I now assume) to mean if you pay attention to billionares ruining the world instead of playing with a dog with a stick, you will be unhappy. Which, yes, this is true, but perhaps not the most important metric.