Never a base model, absolutely with an agent and function calling with a properly made tool and retrieval.
- Posts
- 12
- Comments
- 102
- Joined
- 1 yr. ago
- Posts
- 12
- Comments
- 102
- Joined
- 1 yr. ago
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
So 2 or 3 devs?
Because those other bodies are worlds. In centuries to come, every one of these will be important and uniquely valued.
What kind of argument is "reality too hard to science." – Dogmatic clown level arguments. Anyone stating this should be purged from academia. This is the culture of the crisis academics talk about. This is the collapse. Fundamental contextual logic has failed. Planet is a verb, by the IAU definition, used incorrectly as a noun, in an oxymoron, with recursion. That is epic 16th century level nonsense. Nouns and verbs are what, 3rd grade level skills?
I care that it is draconian nonsense. It wasn't created by planetary scientists, or by consulting any. It was primarily created by a highschool teacher in Temecula California. It is temporally incongruent. Saying it is not a planet then calling it a planet in the following name is an oxymoron, or rather just moronic. And it impedes real science and science communication depreciating the era and discoveries that have happened.
The real definition of worlds is by gravitational differentiation and the point at which a body is dominated by geology.
No object is ever defined by external factors. It is a fundamental elementary logic failure to attempt to do so. If you drive your car in a bicycle lane and clear out all the cyclists, what the &%$# object is defined. Absolutely nothing! You may define a condition here, not an object, not a noun! The fact that this definition even exists is an epic embarrassment that makes the entire field look like a bunch of dogmatic clowns.
Tell my family they have a new problem to deal with.
Maybe walk down to the pier and play a guitar with an open case. I could probably get more than $40 from scrap copper. I could maybe talk a used car lot into letting me clear some headlights for twice that much. Hawking some expensive junk on Craig's list might also work. Pawn some tools.
I've been on most pain meds and stuff. If you haven't tried Diclofenac, maybe ask for it or give it a go. That is a muscle relaxer with very few down sides and has made a big difference for me lately unlike anything else I have taken. It does not screw with the mind or stomach in the same way as most other things. It just needs to go with food, but like it doesn't mess with adhd meds or other down sides really. A neighbor had hip surgery and was like, I should take this, and wow did it make a difference. My lows are much more manageable and I can do stuff I haven't been able to do in years.
I also have poor blood flow in my legs from being a cyclist with enormous legs. If you place a heating pad under your lower thighs and calves as much as possible, it may greatly help with circulation and blood flow while accelerating your recovery significantly. That is also part of advanced recovery with endurance races, especially when combined with compression tights. If you feel cold feet at all, it will likely help in recovery to add some heat to improve blood flow and circulation. The taller you are, the more import this is too. Like I can't even fully heal cuts or road rash on my lower legs without adding a heating pad routine, but with a daily routine of an hour or two, I will fully recover in a couple of weeks even with really bad stuff.
As far as visiting here around LA, you really need a solid plan of where you want to go and what you want to do with every link known and connected. It is not like most places where you can just wing it like a tourist in the tourist targeted way. Sure there is Disneyland, and that is all inclusive and encapsulated. Laguna Beach down here closer to me is cool to walk around. They have a big art show once a year called pageant of the masters. There is Venice Beach too. Downtown LA is a major disappointment to see. You've likely seen it countless times in films because of its proximity to Hollywood, but you will quickly see how it was strategically framed and often digitally augmented to make it appear much larger than it really is. The stars walk and Hollywood Blvd are in a run down neighborhood. There are no historical sites or significant things to see in the area that are relative to the past or film. You learn that all you see in movies and shows is hacked together temporary junk that looks like a dump just outside of the image frame.
I forget the name for it but there is a ringed distance around the film studios where the unions Mark the boundary for day work without the studio paying for accommodations or paying transportation costs. Almost everything you have ever seen that was filmed in Hollywood happens within this boundary. So when you're traveling around the region you might have strange familiarity in places at random like deja vu. One of the cool things, US wise, is that so much stuff is imported through the port of Long Beach, so there are many small businesses scattered throughout the LA basin selling stuff that is only available here or places like Shenzhen. Through you probably have similar around London.
That is about all I know of use. I'm boring by most people's standards. My interests are generally too niche to even talk about or too subtle to call a real destination, and I value the nerdy stuff over the experience and emotions.
GL and have fun!
Mine was riding a bicycle to work, and fighting two SUVs in 2014. Both of them were total losses, and they only managed to break my neck and back. Empirically, I have chronic damage to my thoracic spin between the shoulder blades that makes posture very limited. It is the rarest region for people to injure, so my back issues are very atypical. The underlying cause of my issues are unknown, which leaves me in a doomed limbo in life. I actually had very serious damage to C1 and the base of my skull that was nearly lethal. So all the neurosurgeons see is an ambiguous unremarkable radiologist's report from an MRI, and the extremely concerning initial damage to a region of my spine that could be a ticking time bomb, and want nothing to do with the risk involved with trying to find the cause or a solution. I have had to come to terms with that and it doesn't really bother me much any more. I was supposed to die in 2014 but I am only half dead now, so whatever, roll with it. I'm not sharing for the sympathy or whatnot. I'm always worried that asking anything personal might make the other person uncomfortable in some way that is off putting. So I often lead by example and just put myself out there to help gauge or imply my level of interest, openness, and straightforwardness.
I have never heard of disability support for a flight. What does that entail? I cannot sustain sitting upright beyond 45 degrees at the very most. Even then I need my legs up in a way the takes all tension and strain off of holding up my head, arms, and shoulders. Like lying here in bed right now, I'm proper up on pillows where my elbows rest on the bed and forearms over my torso, so that only my wrists and hands are engaged with my phone. My back is completely neutral in this position so my pain level falls to a consistent white noise where I can hear my internal dialog clearly. I can also use my bedside stand for a laptop in a similar neutral position. I can be upright and walk around just fine for an hour or so each day, but that builds stress about like lifting weights in a gym. I can actually go for much longer if I try, but I won't be able to sleep very much for several days afterwards. Then I turn into a mindless zombie, and multiple days in a row are killers that can last for months without sleep. So I only exist in my little isolated prison safe from the killer zombie me. I don't think the airlines have a zombie containment zone, but who knows, I had no idea they had any real disability remedies beyond midget sardine accommodations.
Lol, me bae do me! jk.
This place is urban sprawl. I'm a shut in, stuck with religious fanatics that would freak out about anyone even visiting me and I'm way way south of LA. Everything here is cars to get to stuff.
Hollywood sucks, as do most destinations here in my opinion. This place is more of a lifestyle than anything else. It is a cool place to be a part of the lifestyle, but it is not a very good commercialized tourist destination, and that is largely why it is such a cool place to live. I know there is a big diversity culture here, and you might be into that, but that is out of my scope of experience. This place may be a shock in terms of expectations versus reality. Like beach culture is not even seasonal. People go to the beach here when the winds blow from the desert and it gets much hotter in the LA basin. Those are our beach days about like other places get rain or snow days. The water is deep here off the coast so it is cold most of the year. This makes microclimates within a mile or so of the coast that are very different than further inland.
All that said, the La Brea tar pits are the most significant site in terms of scientific understanding of the world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pits
I always wanted to visit them but never got the chance.
Sorry to hear your limitations. You may actually have me beat, though it seems you can still travel. There is no chance that I could manage a flight like London to LA, that would kill me. I could not sit upright for that long.
Try growing up in Tennessee. We had all the bullshit about the US civil war constantly shoved at us. The fuckers lasted 4 years of rebellion for the right to rape black women at will and free labor from the men, but you'd swear these worthless right wing fucks were gods of honor and glory. Nearly everyone in school was bored and rolling eyes at the nonsense.
Conservative inbreds are fuckwits everywhere. It doesn't matter if it is bum fuck nowhere in China Russia, Africa, or Alabama. You go to bum fuck nowhere, and you're going to find backwards fuckwits that are scared of everything unfamiliar and different than themselves, too narcissistic to admit their own ignorance, and too stupid to spark curiosity and learn something new.
I'm smart enough to know I'd fuck a girl in every one of these places, so I better try and be open and nice to them all, but what do I know, I'm just another fuckwit.
Women will buy from women in a bike shop but not from men in most cases. Likewise, the demographic of male cyclists that shop in brick and mortar retail stores, is very partial to female staff. Therefore, by the back office numbers, a girl is statistically far more valuable for shop staff in almost every circumstance regardless of personality, intelligence, or skill. I would like to say otherwise, but the numbers in the shops with ~60 employees across 3 stores and years pointed otherwise. The thing that really sucks is how women's retail stuff for cycling is always a loss or breaks even at best. The lack of volume leads to major issues with overburden inventory over time. Overburden is why most nice shops fail within a decade or are a hobby business with someone willing to inject considerable funds in the $100k-$300k range to bail out the shop about once a decade. Every time a wrong part is ordered or a poorly planned size run of clothing sells lopsided, or some niche lineup of bikes is suddenly unpopular, it chips away at cash flow and eventually strangles the business slowly from the back office causing a default on a major distributor's credit account. This causes all the mainline distributors to pull the shop's credit for cash only access. Next preseason order cycle, the margins will be garbage and no popular products are accessible. No shop will last more than 2 years like this.
So like, I hired any female cyclist at a much higher starting wage. I was the Buyer and back office manager for the chain. From my perspective, I viewed women on staff like a life vest and triage. My job was to keep the thing alive for as long as possible without losing access to credit. Women were an opportunity to triage a large open wound where my alternative is to give up entirely on 5%-15% of the entire market.
Maybe that is an interesting counter perspective. I only cared about the unbiased numbers. In most instances I rarely interacted with these people. And at work, I have a strict policy of 'never shitting in my own back yard.'
The sad thing is how close we are to getting into a space civilization and so much more but how we can't get our shit together long enough or priorities straight. One m-type astroid accessed in low Earth orbit – there are several already there – has more mineral wealth than all that humans have ever accessed in the Holocene on the surface of this gravity prison with its differentiated gravitationally sequestered artificial resource scarcity that hoards all the good stuff in the core. All we have are the scraps that have landed on the surface after it solidified and got mixed around. The m is for metal. Those are remnants of differentiated, read - concentrated, cores of planetesimals. That kind of wealth makes resource scarcity obsolete and creates both wealth and infrastructure resources to get into space colonies. Space colonies cannot have waste systems. Their primary constraint is heat radiated into space. The wealth to fund and create such a sustainable environment fixes much of what we fail at now. It moves populations into space too. We've known about how to build the stations since Dr. O'Neill did the studies in the 1970s about only using established materials science and engineering to create the O'Neill cylinders at up to 9 kilometers in diameter and 30 kilometers long with just steel and concrete. The wonder of such innovation would accelerate our passage into the next age of technology – biology. One day the masters of biology will look back and pity us in our primitive stone age of silicon. The foundations of that world are stones of the future orbiting around us now.
That is what I see when I look up. I see the twinkling reflections of cislunar stations much brighter than the background stars, a place where most humans live a few centuries from now. It is a remarkable place after the end of the age of scientific discovery at the beginning of the engineered expansion, but still centuries from my Parsec 7 that I call home.
I agree.
I think people should change their names for similar reasons. If you want to get a certain job or whatnot, change your name as that is one of the strongest ways to create a similar bias. Like if I want to be an electrical engineer, change my name to Max Watts. I bet the bias that creates is equivocal; just on the edge of plausibly deniable consciousness.
Original comment said in good faith, but from sketchy long term memory of stuff I've come across. It seems like it was in a Lex Friedman or similar podcast at some point, but from some time in the last 3-10 years. I may have conflated or misunderstood, as I am not experienced with such complexity. I seem to recall it coming up around the time several astronomers were speaking publicly about issues with processing large amounts of data and soliciting solutions. I just recall wondering why search started to suck around 2017, and putting the pieces together when I heard this. Now, in retrospect, it seems much of the changes were also adversarial for rival AI training after the Transformers paper. At least, looking at how search results are salted now, and the way images are selected for search is absolutely adversarial for AI training datasets... but that is all I know, and should be taken as friendly neighborhood water cooler talk, always with the best of intentions.
There are only 2 relevant web crawlers; Google's and Microsoft's. All queries from every search engine goes through these two crawlers either directly or through a middle layer of obfuscation.
The issue is that the internet is too large to index. This has been a known emerging issue for a long time. This is the real reason search sucks. It is not deterministic because it cannot be, but therein lies the issue. Without deterministic unbiased information, democracy is dead. And so search sucks. No one has been able to find a solution for efficient access to enormous databases like this except through the methodologies behind AI. At least not for real time search queries.
Yes