Skip Navigation

whoever loves Digit 🇵🇸🇺🇸🏴‍☠️

@ iloveDigit @piefed.social

Posts
2
Comments
119
Joined
10 mo. ago

Digit is Digit. I love her. I knew her online from wallstreetbets and she disappeared while going through some shit. I keep needing proof she's safe.

To anyone I've ever treated unfairly, I apologize.

  • This github repo will make you a millionaire

    • I'm assuming you've never tried to become a millionaire before and it only takes me 2 seconds of googling to find what you're missing
    • The readme doesn't mention making you a millionaire though
    • And I won't showcase it making you a millionaire
    • But if you reply saying you would need to see proof of it working before you spend too much time digging into this, I'll say "have you actually used it? You shouldn't be making assumptions"
    • Since this is a Nazi society, I bet me mirroring your bullshit will be treated very differently by the crowd, from how they react to you bullshitting me to begin with
  • The readme does not mention real world use cases

    I said I would need to see proof of it working, why the fuck would I let everyone that hates me make me spend hours doing a 10x more than needed investigation of every fucking irrelevant link they can come up with

    Showcase it working in real world conditions (you can't because it definitely doesn't) or shut the fuck up moron

  • I was waiting for someone to just lie and pretend the github link is more than a proof of concept. Didn't read past that part but feel free to show the thing working in the real world if you want, retard.

    The readme page doesn't even slightly imply it's designed to work in real world conditions, because it's only a proof of concept. Real world use cases are literally not even mentioned by the dev. But knock yourself out trying to showcase functionality that doesn't exist

    Inb4 you reply with either no showcase at all, or a showcase of what is definitely not real world conditions and only a proof of concept (while you continue lying about it)

  • Blocked for gaslighting

  • Have passed this info onto the dev but it didn't seem useful to them.

    Also, based on your other comments in this thread like the ones where you pretended onion services should never be used due to traffic - blocking you now, no longer interested in seeing if you have anything useful to contribute. If you need to say anything else, feel free to reach out to the dev directly or reach out to me on nostr, where there are no blocks and I'm more patient.

  • conflating my replies for abrasive people with me being abrasive

    also:

    conflating my replies for abrasive people with my reply for someone that posted an off-topic link under possibly good intentions

    When I tell you you come across as an insufferable asshole, I'm not lying like you are when you say it to me

    Btw, I notice how you're incredibly obvious about your connection to the other user that just made a similar comment - that's on purpose, surely, meant to be noticed right? Another layer of the gaslighting, being incredibly obvious about fucked up harassment behaviors but knowing you can deny them while Nazi herd mentality will also deny the obviousness

  • conflating my replies for abrasive people with me being abrasive

    also:

    conflating my replies for abrasive people with my reply for someone that posted an off-topic link under possibly good intentions

    When I tell you you come across as a dick, I'm not lying like you are when you say it to me

  • conflating my replies for hostile disingenuous time wasting dumbasses like you with my reply for someone who posted an irrelevant link under possibly good intentions

    Do you get paid for this or are you just getting practice by trying to gaslight me?

    Didn't read past first few words either way

  • Possibilities:

    A. The screenshot didn't load for you and you're getting way ahead of yourself making shit up presenting it as reality without loading the actual image

    B. (obvious real one) The screenshot did load for you but you're trying to gaslight me by pretending you thought it was really "prickly" or had some extreme "tone" - conflating my replies for hostile disingenuous time wasting dumbasses like you with my reply for someone who posted an irrelevant link under possibly good intentions

    • Look at the fucking number of bullet points of rebuttals for me to make here already, what you're doing is called a "gish gallop" and anyone reading this should look that up
    • There's never need to downvote anyone, downvotes aren't driven by need, you know that and you're wasting time pretending otherwise
    • Whether downvotes are needed is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
    • I'm not wrong
    • Whether I'm wrong is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
    • I didn't ask if I was having a moderation issue
    • Whether I'm aware of the moderation issue I told you about is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
    • I don't care if some off topic thing I didn't ask about is off topic, it doesn't make my post off topic at all unless something is wrong with your client that makes it fail to render the rest of my post (in which case even the part you're seeing is still half on-topic since it's about the place I'm posting it in)
    • I didn't ask if you care about me or think you did, you know that and you're wasting time pretending otherwise
    • Whether you care about me is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
    • I didn't ask if you know me or think you did, you know that and you're wasting time pretending otherwise
    • Whether you know me is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
    • I have no reason to read what you said again
  • It's on topic (literally about the place I'm posting it in, and about programming) but you want it removed. What would happen if both of you said that instead of lying? Would it be unbearable for you to handle your feelings that way instead?

  • Read more carefully, I explained the context.

    It's weird how after complaining you couldn't understand such a short post, you gaslight me about how "good" my reasons have to be for noticing obvious things.

    Regarding the tools - currently using zint, ffmpeg, and zxing as I continue trying to do this. Was zbar instead of zxing at time of the original post.

    Idea definitely should be easy for someone with more knowledge/expertise than me, and if anyone got the idea from my removed post, they can get it done faster than me and pretend it had nothing to do with me, thanks to my post being removed. But that's totally aside from the point of whether people think it seems like bots or just regular human stupidity driving vote patterns like these.

  • No it's not, stop whining child

  • If we're talking names, I've always liked Apache for its name

  • I'm too based to have a github account

  • Would be cool, but my thinking has been it's just not feasible yet with current hardware

  • Humor and my personal views aside, you're absolutely right that for this project I should use a more appropriate license. I will look into Unlicense and Apache. Thanks again.

  • Programming @programming.dev

    Cradicle the p2p github alternative (based on Radicle) is looking for users/testers

  • Science Memes @mander.xyz

    Not sure if this is a science meme but politicalmemes hated it so I'll try here