Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
367
Joined
10 mo. ago

  • I’ve been forced to use AI for work for some time now and it’s been very clear for a while that ChatGPT is an awful model

    I’ve been in a state of mild surprise people default to ChatGPT for well over a year

    If you have to use AI why on earth would you choose ChatGPT

  • Sure except this is Star Fleet, which is science fiction, so we have every reason to assume that a mutiny would only occur for good reason, like when Kirk was possessed. An evil CMO trying to illegitimately seize power would indeed require an elaborate plot.

  • Just also quote the part where I said we’d need an elaborate plot to have the CMO create a mutiny that officers go along with. Then there wouldn’t be any confusion

  • I suppose that makes you a 'doesn't understand statistics and ignores the evidence' kind of guy 🤷‍♀️

    Good luck out there.

  • Well now we’re talking about a mutiny and I don’t see why the officers would side with a CMO committing mutiny, if anything they’d almost certainly side with the captain. We would need an elaborate plot to substantiate the CMO successfully rallying star fleet officers to commit a mutiny.

    The captain can simply relieve the CMO for cause, promote another medical officer, and that would be that.

  • If the captain believed the CMO was illegitimately declaring officers medically unfit I’m highly skeptical such a ploy would work just because it seems possible on paper

  • That’s not how statistics works at all. A sample of 30,000 people out of 1,300,000,000 is in fact highly representative. Please go look up how sample sizes work because there is no way to have a meaningful conversation if you don’t understand basic statistics.

  • There are 1.3 billion people in China and you can read the report to see their satisfaction with a variety of metrics from the indifference of local officials to their participation in public health programs, over the past however many years

    I hope you understand that even a 5% disapproval rate for something in China is still somewhere near 70 million people. There are only 11 million uyghurs in China. Do you not see how if you add up all the people who approve and disapprove you get the same ballpark numbers the study is claiming?

    Just do the math lol

  • You just blindly reject Harvard research because deep down inside you know better, right?

    It must actually boggle your mind that people can honestly approve of their government even when that government isn’t doing anything special

    Did you know around 80% of republicans support Trump? That’s about the same % of Russians who agree w Putin. You can go look that up.

    Your intuitive knowledge is worthless

  • I was not prepared to mentally handle the consequences of knowing what barnacles are

  • The mainstream media continue to inexplicably rehabilitate her image and as you can see by the comments here it’s literally working

  • China and America are perfectly functional governments despite their flaws. Are you just looking for an opportunity to dunk on them?

    In the area of automative regulation America is the only developed nation to have increased traffic deaths over the past decade or so. You can go verify that fact.

    So when it comes to seeing China implement a basic automative regulation, it is indeed a “must be nice” situation.

    The problem with your original statement is that it’s stupid and patronizing

  • It’s a spectrum of intensity like sweet or sour

    Except instead you sort the states by gun homicides and domestic violence rates

  • Well it is in fact nice for the governed when their governments enforce good regulations. I’m not sure what’s in dispute here, do you not think it’s nice to have a proper regulation in place that will be followed?

    Your original statement called the US and China not nice so I just followed your grammar logic 🤷‍♀️

    Are you just desperate to have us acknowledge that these countries have serious flaws too?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • That’s a bad dude

  • Well, the US is very nice to corporations which is why they’re often left to self regulate, are regulated by former industry insiders, or are barely regulated through fines and settlements

    So yeah I suppose in this regard China is not being nice but being nice doesn’t effectively regulate corporations. This is in fact a good example of a functional government doing its job

  • She’s a bare naked political opportunist who has been doing a continuous press tour about being betrayed by maga and having her life endangered by Trump.

    She has dodged all questions about her complicity, no reporters have meaningfully pushed her on anything (though we may have different standards for what constitutes good journalism), and we see nyt using and concluding with mtg’s own premise of evolving toward respectability

    They, nyt and cbs are egregious examples, are creating the very appearance of respectability she is probably not only paying to create but also serves as another avenue to drive negative attention toward maga and Trump

  • Ignore what? Cover what situation? The ongoing crisis between MTG and maga/trump? That isn’t a real situation and it was covered on the spot because it was a tweet some time ago followed by MTG doing press runs.

    What’s being covered are conjured media stories simply caring about her for no reason that conclude she is being rehabilitated in some manner.

    This is manufactured propaganda to keep her in the spotlight and rehab her image in what I can only imagine is a stupid attempt to fuel anti trumpism