Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)G
Posts
63
Comments
4737
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Well, yeah....

    Most of the time it doesn't work, rarely it does.

    Intermittent rewards are what we're wired for. That's why random rewards/acknowledgment tickle our brains more than standard rewards we know are coming.

    That's the reason there's such a big push "to just try it".

    It's the same strategy the first crack dealers used

  • Kick them out, shame them

    Love the "singular they", but to clarify it's one state House rep, she stopped caucusing with Dems 20 months ago, she's retiring after this term, and has been pro trump for 6 years....

  • he was a vice-chair from 2017-2021 previously.

    While at the same time being the chair of Minnesota's state party, and under him it went from purple to solid blue and the home of some of our most progressive representatives especially on the topic of Israel....

    I really don't think you understand what a vice chair does, or that c chair can do anything they want.

    I get it, up until 18 months ago I spent 30 years saying the same thing you are today, it was super easy and even tho I paid attention, I didn't need to, because nothing changed.

    But then 18 months ago it changed...

    Look around at what's happened since then.

    If I'm right, everything is working as intended

    If you're right, Martin is so incompetent that he might as well be helping progressives. But if you think the voting members of the DNC put him there to oppose progressives, wouldn't getting rid of him just mean his replacement is better at holding progressives down?

    Like, there's no way any sort of logic works out to back up what you're doing.

    Which is trying to get people tuned out of the Dem party months before one of the most important midterms of your fucking life

    Edit:

    Nevermind, your already on my blocklist as your account(s) from other instances, and it's obvious facts and logic haven't magically started working so I'll add your new account to the same list your other account(s) are on.

  • Last I checked Hakeem Jeffries was still the House Minority Leader, Leader of the House Democratic Caucus, and Chair of the House Democratic Caucus

    Yep, him and Schumer's leadership elections were in January 2025. Its voters was elected reps, and at the time the current DNC under Jamie Harrison would have bankrupted state parties if their reps didn't vote neoliberal .

    The DNC chair election was feburary 2025.

    It's voted on by the ~420 voting members of the DNC, they pivoted away from neoliberalism, and picked a chair who dumped all the "victory fund" money back on state parties. That was the cudgel neoliberals (specifically Schumer and Jefferies) used to get elected, it's gone now...

    You're talking about DSCC and DCCC like they're important, try to go find mentions of anyone giving a fuck about them prior to February 2025.

    Neoliberals are pretending those things matter, because they lost the DNC 18 months ago

    Democratic Socialist candidates are winning despite the DNC doing the bare minimum to help,

    If you think the DNC should help any candidate in a primary, either you don't know what you're talking about or you're the same as a neoliberal just with different policy position.

    A bias in the opposite direction is still a problem.

    On an equal playingfield progressives will dominate, and have been for the last 18 months you haven't been paying attention

  • the current establishment Democrats

    They were "establishment Dems" when they controlled the DNC, because that's the political establishment...

    They don't anymore, but even when they did it always made sense to call them by their faction name: neoliberals.

    Who is the "establishment" changes. And the current one supports Mamdani, El-Sayed, (Angie) Nixon, and all the rest of the progressives winning primaries.

    Billionaires and neoliberals still in office want people to think they're still "the establishment" because they'd rather lose to Republicans than see progressives win.

    Shitting on the Dem party right now is just helping the people you're pissed off at buddy

  • The "shockwaves":

    In the Florida legislature, Angie Nixon has led the fight to lower costs for families and take on the rigged system. Now, she’s ready to take that fight to the U.S. Senate.

    Congratulations, Angie! Onward to November.

    -The DNC chair, literally "the party"

    https://bsky.app/profile/kenmartin.bsky.social/post/3mtfjzz6xm22q

  • And got endorsed by the DNC chair last night after the primary, which is the only time the DNC should be endorsing anyone.

    https://bsky.app/profile/kenmartin.bsky.social

    But billionaires are gonna keep trying to convince people Dems are in dissary and fighting progressives.

  • Even if you’re trying to grow in harmony with a nitrogen fixer that’s just part of the equation.

  • If he wins the November election, as he is expected to do in the conservative stronghold, Donalds would become the first Black governor in any southern US state.

    So confident was Donalds of victory that his television advertisements in the weeks leading to the primary ignored his Republican challengers and focused on former Republican congressman David Jolly, who secured the Democratic party’s nomination on Tuesday

    Sooooo....

    trump thinks he can get a Black man elected Governor in the South....

    Even when running against a white guy who was a Republican till Trump showed up?

    Like, this is a "even if we win, we lose" moment, and I bet the Florida Dem.party put their thumbs on the scales for Jolly... But there's no way Donalds wins in Florida. Too many trump supporters will never vote for a Black man, even with Trump's endorsement. And since he'll be top of ticket in florida, a lot of MAGA in florida will sit out and just not vote.

    Fucking weird Republicans think this will work

  • That's got a crazy amount of nitrogen, but that's still just one of the big three...

    I spent winters shoveling literally tons of manure onto a field by pitchfork until I went to college. So deep it was literally just a field of shit by the time it was down, a solid 3-4 inch coating for acres.

    We still fertilized multiple times a season on top of that. But that was land that had been worked for generations. For a couple of years, replacing nitrogen is fine....

    Because people haven't been growing crops there.

    What happens in a decade when all of that is used up? That's my entire point, it's kicking the can down the road. If someone doesn't think this is a giant issue, they're in denial or haven't really thought thru what's happening.

    There's a reason hillbillies don't like trespassers, it take a lot of land to feed a human.

  • but I thought, if you’re doing it right, you wouldn’t need any.

    I mean...

    Most people don't just plant straight in the ground, they bring in "top soil" that's already fertilized.

    If you just clear out grass and plant veggies, you might get a couple seasons without it, but probably not. Grass is terrible for soil quality and whatever you get isn't going to be much.

    But even if you bring in top soil and do a raised bed, eventually the soil depletes, and you can either add fertilizer or replace the top soil which is the same thing.

    You'll get something but not a lot, so especially in the context of a garden with a high enough yield to effect a grocery bill, it's going to need a huge amount of land without fertilizer, meaning a lot more water and a lot more labor.

    Even if you're trying to grow in harmony with a nitrogen fixer that's just part of the equation.

    Edit:

    I just don't think most people have an half acre of more land to devote to a garden without fertilizer. But some people do.

  • ...

    That's not going to change the price of fertilizer, growing your own is going to get expensive too.

    Like, shit is accelerating the shortage, but it was happening anyways. And there's legitimately no solution. There's things we can do to mitigate it, but it's just kicking the can down the road at this point.

    Like, you know how people always said "we grow enough food, it's a distribution problem"...

    That's not going to be true for much longer, the planet just can't support anywhere near this amount of humans without fertilizer, and we're running out. We need multiple kinds, and the ones we can "make" are made from finite resources.

    Shits going to get rough, and gardens are not going to fix it.

  • ...

    If you don't know or want more info, you're more likely to get that help by asking questions...

    The Motion Picture Production Code was a set of industry guidelines for the self-censorship of content that was applied to most motion pictures released by major studios in the United States from 1934 to 1968. It is also popularly known as the Hays Code, after Will H. Hays, president of the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America (MPPDA) from 1922 to 1945. The code spelled out unacceptable content for motion pictures produced for a public audience in the United States, such as drugs, profanity, and sex. Under Hays's leadership, the MPPDA, later the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and the Motion Picture Association (MPA), adopted the Production Code in 1930 and began rigidly enforcing it in 1934.

    From 1934 to 1954, the code was closely associated with Joseph Breen, the administrator appointed by Hays to enforce the code in Hollywood. The film industry followed the guidelines set by the code well into the late 1950s, but it began to weaken, owing to the combined impact of television, influence from foreign films, controversial directors (such as Otto Preminger) pushing boundaries, and intervention from the courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court.[1][2] In 1968, after several years of minimal enforcement, the Production Code was replaced by the MPAA film rating system.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hays_Code

    The modern ratings system evolved from the Hays code, the fact that it was just the Hays code is why things were so uniform back then. The fact that there was no enforcement is why MPAA was standardized...

    If you're gonna keep acting like you were, you're going to quickly run out of patient people who are willing to help.

    You'd still be able to make your "slams" it's just you'll never actually learn anything.

    How you use social media is up to you buddy

  • Because societies usually progress...

    Like, there was (and still is) rules about acceptable behavior and a ratings system to reflect what something contains.

    A cartoon with a Y7 rating won't contain as much as PG13 and neither will have as much as R rated. If something is "unrated" it means it doesn't meet R guidelines, or that it was just not rated but would have gotten a rating.

    Like, it seems like you're just unaware of ratings systems, despite them existing in every country I'm aware of.

  • Instead of cat proofing, you were supposed to get a server room dog...

  • It's worse, he knows all he's doing is depressing dem turnout.

    He wants Republicans to win midterms so he can use that as justification to call for the DNC chair's resignation and try to replace with a neoliberal who will fix the presidential primary.

    The neoliberala have always been willing to hand elections to Republicans to stop progress, and they're gonna keep trying it. They'll give this midterm away just to slightly increase the odds of taking the DNC back before 2028 primary

  • Amazon is the end result...

    Amazon "guarentees" the lowest prices, and that's true.

    If a product is sold on Amazon, that's the lowest price.online. The manufacturer can't even sell it for lower on their own website.

    Because Amazon uses AI scrapers to constantly check, if it detects a lower price, it will "you may be overpaying for this item" in big red letters next to it, or even removing the buttons that let someone buy it.

    So before they can lower the price anywhere, they have to lower it on Amazon. Because they need the volume that comes with Amazon sales.

    Amazon's "lowest price guarantee" just ends up meaning they keep people from getting it cheaper anywhere else. But for an individual, each individual purchase is a better deal at Amazon.

    To win we need a drastic boycott where everyone just toughs it out and pays a little more for slower shipping to buy direct again. The manufacturers will make more per unit, and eventually will be able to stop playing Amazon's game.

    And that would leave Amazon with just Temu slop, and actually financially impact Bezos.

    All we gotta do is get people to think big picture, we could bankrupt Bezos in less than a year.

  • That was intentional...

    Large corporations don't undercut small businesses because vertical integration allows them to take smaller profit shares

    They intentionally lose money in some markets so that small businesses get run out of business.

    Then, after the small businesses are gone, they raise prices higher than the small businesses were to begin with.

    It was a problem when large corps "drove down prices", because that was them running everyone else out of the marketplace.

    It's why I hate the term "enshittification", it starts identifying the problem after it's too late to fix. That's why companies are fine doing it, but the time shit gets worse, there's no other alternative.

    We don't roll back to before it got shitty, we need to roll back to "when there was competition".