Practicing can alleviate aphantasia and it matches how people describe an internal screen. Like your watching stuff inside your head. It's kinda flat and small and contained in a way, distinctly different than how people do out of body experiences for example.
Also one difference I've noted in descriptions and myself is that imagining can repeat. You imagine something and can do it multiple times quite accurately. Whereas an experience gets kinda corrupted, lost in memory. I have no way to repicture this event with my mind/imagination so I took to 3d tools.
Asking is probably not usual. Some scientists do their thesises through seeing the result first. It's different to imagine something internally than to "go to"/"get" something else, the latter being something that someone else knows as well rather than self-born. Although I guess one could expand to the thought that everything internal ultimately is everything external yada yada
Oh that I didn't get from skimming Wikipedia. Because of a loss of freedom/control or am mistaking the concept?
I didn't understand the timing of why these discs align so it's not accurate in the animation but it seemed cyclical/mechanical/mathematic, like a pulse towards various different directions
Yes that is actually similar. What would more discs than 3 spatial axii mean in this case? The blender object has something like 7 but I'm not sure if it's the correct number. More than x, y and z axii definitely tho.
What could lock into the middle is another question. The sense of scale of it feels huge, like anything between a space station and a planet
Desk toys try to simulate orbits around a thing but that movie effect does eerily have similarities. Not the most important details but behavior. Another one to add to the list ig
I recall some parts of it maybe from clips. I guess this thing is similar to the effect she enters or something? I remember it being closer to the sphere thing at the end of Annihilation.
Those workflows