That's a straw man. I don't have any issue with Gaza protesters.
I just don't understand why you would use your protest to undermine democratic candidates.
Why not protest outside republican events? That would certainly be more impactful.
In the history of these American protest movements, which of them were successful by protesting outside events of government candidates trying to get elected ?
Of Trump and Kamala, which do you think the people of Gaza would have preferred as president?
The Gaza protests at the last election were an absolute farce. An absolute win for the Trump campaign. If they weren't planned by the Trump campaign then they should have been.
It's intended use was misinformation but perhaps not in the way you imagine.
Rather than producing credible images, these sorts of projects undermine actual credible images.
For example, if you're team zion, then when shown images of how devastating Israel's attack on Gaza has been you can just disregard them as "probably fake".
"Oh pish posh, a child can create these images on google maps".
Sorry, with the greatest respect, this is incorrect.
Here in Australia you can register a company by paying the regulator fees of about $600 AUD (about half a weeks average wage). Thereafter you can start selling pizzas anjoying the limited liability of your corporate structure.
There are of course exceptions and caveats, notably your landlord will almost certainly ask for a personal guarantee - so you have to pay the lease even if the company goes tits up, but that's mitigated by your ability to assign the lease to another tenant if you wish.
You might be thinking of publicly listed companies which are listed on the stock exchange. Those are subject to a much higher level of scrutiny and rigorous regulation which is indeed out of reach of "mum and dad" businesses, but that's not a requirement for limited liability.
Of course, plenty of people don't bother talking to a CPA before starting a business, or a company may be inadvisable for whatever reason, and they end up trading without a corporate trading structure, and have no limited liability.
The same way you introduce a law penalising the c-suite: you pretty much can't.
As I mentioned in my comment, the US has a "captured state" meaning that governments don't represent the interests of people, they represent the interests of corporations and capital.
That might change temporarily in a time of upheaval - like a revolution level event. Until then, you're cooked.
There's risk in any business. Being smart and working hard isn't enough. Sometimes you just at get unlucky.
I know fediverse users hate corporations, and there's a lot to hate, but the idea of individuals protecting themselves from those risks is a critical element of a modern economy.
Nah. With rules like this, no one could ever do anything. I mean the pizza shop on the corner couldn't operate. Who would risk their home (if they're lucky enough to have one) just to not make any money running a restaurant?
Directors et cetera can be held accountable for criminal negligence with the current rules, it's just that they rarely are, because we have a "captured state" - a government and judicial arm that's terrified of upsetting the corporations that get them elected.
The solution IMO is disallowing corporate campaign donations, and capping personal donations. Also harsher penalties for the corporations themselves, rather than just "cost of doing business" penalties.
I've always struggled with interactions. Didn't like it as a kid.
That said, I often wish I'd learned more about how to behave in polite company, because what seems obvious to others is not obvious to me.
With my own kids, I certainly don't "force them" to hug creepy old people, but encouraging them to greet acquaintances is just part of the normal things you teach kids because saying hello to people is not in fact intuitive.
Honestly, if having to hug grandma when you were a kid even though she had a weird mustache is the worst thing that happened to you, then things were pretty good right?
That's a straw man. I don't have any issue with Gaza protesters.
I just don't understand why you would use your protest to undermine democratic candidates.
Why not protest outside republican events? That would certainly be more impactful.
In the history of these American protest movements, which of them were successful by protesting outside events of government candidates trying to get elected ?
Of Trump and Kamala, which do you think the people of Gaza would have preferred as president?
The Gaza protests at the last election were an absolute farce. An absolute win for the Trump campaign. If they weren't planned by the Trump campaign then they should have been.