Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E
Posts
3
Comments
395
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • This is like letting bigots define sexuality or gender as "political", thus putting them in a category of something that is debatable, and of something that is "problematic" to discuss at times of their choosing. And just like a person's right to be who they are is not "political", neither is Ms Rachel "controversial" just because she is the target of a smear campaign.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • That's what? A few megabytes of storage? That's an absurd restriction.

  • He got too rich, had a crisis of conscience, then took some time in Africa to end up deciding that money > conscience.

    In short, no one's "paying him" to be a bigot, he's just the typical rich piece of shit. He defends other rich pieces of shit because that's what rich pieces of shit do.

  • Stop using All as your front page...

  • 30% support it, and 30% generally oppose it (theoretically), and the rest can't be bothered. Can't decide if that group's worse or just equally bad to the supporters.

  • No, it's not. Why are you so insistent on giving them a pass when they're deliberately lying to get away with this shit?

  • Nope. It doesn't disagree with anything, it's just irrelevant. Two admittedly centrist women missed the vote to the most vile candidate possible, while countless centrist men won to slightly farther right opponents. That math is crystal clear, and Obama's first election has no bearing on that.

  • Again, irrelevant. Also, he won twice, so his initial campaign wasn't the end all be all, either.

  • I think it's a stretch to say Obama wasn't centrist, but really it's irrelevant. US voters were fine with voting in centrist men in if they were appealing enough, but once a centrist woman is put up, they'll let a self-confessed wannabe dictator into office with hardly a fight.

  • And yet it's elected centrist man after centrist man. Funny, that.

  • "Precisely" would be getting a life size string-pull doll that says what she said and dressing it up like your dead grandma.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Not a single word of it was substantiated by them.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • "Laser focus", lol. You tried to justify the OF accusation and I explained why that's bs.

    As for the "whole thing", your word doesn't prove anything and your outright refusal to provide even an ounce of evidence for your deluge of accusations suggests I'm not the one acting in bad faith here.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Still nothing but your word that she's "manipulating" anyone or anything.

    And, breaking news, everyone uses that sub for advertising. Do you also get this self-righteous when creators link their patreon or other socials? How exactly is OF different?

  • Clear your history and check for yourself. It's not hard to do.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Lots of outrageous accusations without any evidence, with a bit of misogynistic sex shaming to top it off. Methinks you're full of shit.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Certain people get so pissy that Rian dared to add depth to a character, treating their original, basic Hero's Journey story as peak writing that can't ever be touched again. It tracks that you fail to see the possibilities left by TLJ.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • the term...is rapidly expanding to be used more generally

    "Rapidly" is one way to put it. It was basically instant. Like I said, it's a bad word.