I don't think anyone is thinking Google is in doing the wrong decision. The problem is that Google, and other corporations, work with a set of rules different to normal, not corporate entities, don't. Like they can bought the most competitive cars on the global markets, while regular Americans are stuck to whatever Ford and GM want to sell them.
"In this tired times, we need reconcilation, left the past behind and meet our opponents on the middle. This is why we are not going to open any investigation on past administration actions and continue with all their policies" - Democrats, if they come to power someday again.
I was in a (synth|dark)wave party last week and the DJ was doing this build up and just before the drop someone screamed (like really loud) SIX SEVEN!!!! and the build up paid with that. Everyone around me was laughing their ass off while dancing. 5/7 would drop 67 again.
It's doesn't happen enough as it should be but, for example, it was found that Microsoft abused it's dominant position on the OS market to stablish IE as the standard on browsers and was forced to ask what browser the user wanted to install between Firefox, chrome, Opera and IE. That stopped once chrome took over.
The problem is that Steam have a dominant position on the market, when you do that regulations are different. Some markets with natural monopolies like energy distribution for example can't raise prices without being approved by a regulator, and so on. Again, the problem is not asking the same price for itself, is doing it while controlling+80% of the PC gaming market.
And is abuse of dominant position when you control +80% of the market.
If a dev want a profit of 10us for game sold, it's has to sell as 13us on steam. But if I open a marketplace and only charge 10% they could sell it for 12, getting a better margin selling for less, but they can't if they want to use steam too. That affect players because cheaper options are not available, affect devs because they have less option, affect other stores because they can grow up competing on price.
And that's only possible because of Steam dominant position, because steam can strongarm devs into getting the same price as their competitors without reducing their 30% slice.
"The internet" in general keep arguing that steam dominant position is not relevant, while they forbid any dev to sell their game on other plataforms for less (don't even mention the steam keys because they are not part of the equation)
Would be nice the day it's decides that the primary objective can be fulfilled by a secondary objective of getting money and that shit starts hacking banks.
Yep, same.