I have read up on it, and people who advocate for it take as a given that it would make things better, but I just dont see it. I go by three axioms:
as long as drawing districts is a political process, districts will be drawn to the partisan advantage of the major party in charge
Once you have multi-member districts, major parties will run a candidate for as many slots as they are allowed to. And party-line voters will expect to have a way to express a party-line preference. I expect that any system which does not allow a party to run a candidate for every slot will be challenged.
Once you disassociate votes with individual candidates, major party bosses can dole out "safe" seats as patronage. But if you don't disassociate votes with individual candidates, a party can still sweep a multi-member district with 50.1% percent of the vote for each spot
The only case where proportional voting helps is where the multi-member district becomes so large that it is the only district, and now it can't be gerrymandered at all. But you still have other problems then.
I would sooner keep districts the way they are, but make many more of them, and introduce either RCV or a true runoff when no candidate gets 50%.
But that is functionally identical to what we have now: in a district with 5 slots, D's run 5 candidates, R's run 5 candidates, most people pick D or R down the line. A district can still be drawn to favor one over the other, except instead of 1 safe seat, you have 5 safe seats.
The only change would be that an impactful third party can only change one of those five safe seats. By moving to this sort of proportional representation, you actually dilute third parties' power further.
I'm not a big fan of proportional representation, because it can be gamed just like the current system, but in proportional representation you don't actually cast a ballot for a person. While a third party candidate might sneak in there with some proportion of the vote, for the most part it will still be D's and R's with most of the vote, so whoever is the first D or R on the list will basically have the job for life, with no practical way to challenge them at all.
I do like ranked choice voting, in conjunction with a massive increase in the size of Congress. 435 is way too small. 1435 might be the right number, if my math is right that could be about 250k people per Rep. Let's see people try to gerrymander 175 Congressional Districts in California....
No no no, it's not an admission of weakness at all. He is incapable of that. It is two contradictory things, at the same time:
if Democrats win, it's because they cheat! Expect a lot of whining after the midterms, which will seem pointless but manifest itself as a series of Jan 6's in scattered statehouses where the stochastic "freedom fighters" try to fix it themselves.
Then, when that fails, he will blame Republicans for not backing him enough, and announce his plans to form a new party. He seems to have (finally!) accepted that he can't run again, but Donald Trump Jr. will run instead, on an explicit platform of "My Dad's still in charge". They won't even need to change the hats.
Except the last guy who hasnt decided yet was one of the GOPers who lost his primary. He might be feeling spicy and decide to vote against it.
You're right that nornally, these sorts of announcements are "hall passes" where the party gives certain members permission to appear moderate in order to win elections, while still getting their agenda passes. This feels different, somehow, engineered so that Cassidy takes the brunt of GOP rage over it, since he's not on the ballot anymore.
Edit: even though this aged like milk, I said what I said....
But more recently, the term has been used by conservative groups and cryptocurrency firms that claim they are victims. Trump signed an executive order a year ago designed to punish banks for restricting services to customers based on their political or religious beliefs.
I'm surprised no crypto has claimed to be a religion yet.
AI won't replace mathematicians. But AI may replace their grad students, when the Computer Science department shows how much more "work" the Al can do and steals funding from the Mathematics department.
Then, when the current Math faculty retires, there won't be any new Mathematicians to take their place.
Certain employer-sponsored visas have requirements that the job be posted for a period of time to see if any US applicants apply. This is supposed to make sure the foreign worker isn't "taking a job away" from a similarly qualified American.
Companies do prefer to hire foreign nationals for these jobs, though, because they typically take less pay, and their US work authorization is tied to their employment, so that makes it much harder for them to change jobs in the US without leaving the country first. So while they are supposed to "post the job" for Americans to apply, they will do the bare minimum to post it, and make sure the requirements are written so that no one other than a foreign worker would bother applying.
So, he's qualified for Trump's Cabinet