Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D
Posts
0
Comments
839
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Nobody said the aliens were smart.

  • "Incus is a next-generation system container, application container, and virtual machine manager."

  • That's really weird to see those in boxes. They are the main brand that comes in bags where I am at least. (Besides the super bland religious-or-something brand)

  • Who are all these people in the photographs you inherited from your own parents, then I did from you? How were they related to me?

  • Of course vulnerabilities exist. And creating a major one like this for an LLM would likely lead to it destroying things like a toddler (in fact this has already happened to a company run by idiots)

    But what it didn't do was copy-with-changes as would be required to 'evolve' like a virus. Because training these models requires intense resources and isn't just a terminal command.

  • Why would someone direct the output of an LLM to a terminal on its own machine like that? That just sounds like an invitation to an ordinary disaster with all the 'rm -rf' content on the Internet (aka training data). That still wouldn't be access on a second machine though, and also even if it could make a copy, it would be an exact copy, or an incomplete (broken) copy. There's no reasonable way it could 'mutate' and still work using terminal commands.

    And to be a meme requires minds. There were no humans or other minds in my analogy. Nor in your question.

  • If you know that it's fancy autocomplete then why do you think it could "copy itself"?

    The output of an LLM is a different thing from the model itself. The output is a stream of tokens. It doesn't have access to the file systems it runs on, and certainly not the LLM's own compiled binaries (or even less source code) - it doesn't have access to the LLM's weights either. (Of course it would hallucinate that it does if asked)

    This is like worrying that the music coming from a player piano might copy itself to another piano.

  • From the artist:

    "CONTEXT: I wrote/drew this in 2020. Lol. Happy New Year!"

  • Supplies!

  • It does, but in common language that could go either way. Especially since it's not the technical phrase "greater than".

  • And 13 is unclear if it's strictly 'more than' or 'more than or equal'

  • I wouldn't be surprised. I'd guess a lot of the law stuff is either wrong or super obvious also. But I did like the show

  • Yes, a TV show character who is obsessed with whales, and talks about them non-stop when allowed.

    (The plot of the show is that she's Korea's first autistic attorney. The title is "Extraordinary Attorney Woo")

  • Florida Rat

  • That's true. I actually watched both versions

  • Hey, that lady doesn't look like Woo Young-woo, whether it is read straight or flipped. Kayak, deed, rotator, noon, racecar, Woo Young-woo, Yeoksam Station.

  • "pass through itself" does seem like cheating to me.

  • My hearing has great frequency range... But I often can't understand people.

    My vision is decent, and I can control it well (for seeing stereograms, etc)... But I require glasses to see farther than a few inches (around a decimeter) clearly.

    My sense of smell is extremely weak, that's both a nerf and a buff. But it means my sense of taste is largely based on degree of salty/sweet/etc. and I can't easily tell nuance (like between different brands of the same food/drink)

  • This can even happen to technical terms, for example bimonthly now has both the original meaning of once every 2 months, and also means semimonthly, twice a month.

    In other words it's completely worthless as a word because it fails to specify between conflicting meanings.