Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L

Log in | Sign up

@ davidagain @lemmy.world

Posts
5
Comments
985
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Behold, a square

    Jump

  • I'll tell you why not! You hippie homeopaths are all the same! Science has scienced the evidence that there's no evidence for homopathic medicines otter than the libido effect.

  • Stop!

    Jump

  • Just looking though my saved posts, and this is one of them. Thanks again, @Track_Shovel.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I just can't see it ever happening.

    I don't mean any disrespect, and I don't want to kink shame, but that kinda thing is just not my bag, baby.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Dude, I don't mean to boast, but honestly, I think my dick is just WAY too big. Like, I would DESTROY that grape instantly if I tried. It's not just a trick of the camera angle, it just is that big. Honestly, I don't even need to get out a measuring tape to tell you that even with a massive grape, it's just not going to fit.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • The grapes? I can never tell when a grape wants some action. My whole life, I've missed every single signal. Well, that, or the grapes just don't find me attractive, like, EVER.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I.... I don't think I can.

  • Trump Abruptly Cancels Another Mainstream TV Interview

    Jump

  • ...and fuck them up badly, in many ways, and in more than one country. Yes.

  • So you don’t like Trump or Harris – here’s why it’s still best to vote for one of them

    Jump

  • ...gish gallop....

    ....too much for you to handle?....

    At no point have you made a coherent argument based on them, though.

    Don’t switch your criticisms mid stream.

    No, this is exactly the same criticism! It's exactly the gish galloper's technique - make a series of nonsense claims, firing salvo after salvo of nonsense into the argument. There's no point me engaging with any of your other claims until you accept that you were talking nonsense with the first. We don't have a basis for discussion unless we agree what counts as sane or rational points to make from data. I think that any points that require one non-democrat to be three republicans can't possibly have merit, and for a fleeting moment I thought you had accepted that your argument on that specific point was erroneous, but I just now read that you don't recant that assertion at all. Why would I engage with other data if you can't agree that that didn't make sense?

  • So you don’t like Trump or Harris – here’s why it’s still best to vote for one of them

    Jump

  • I think you should re-read the article. I don't think it says what you think it says. I think it says that they dislike Trump and they dislike Harris and that they might be mistaken in their belief that they dislike both equally, and that they should figure that out and vote to stop the one they dislike the most by voting for the other one. It doesn't at any point claim that third party voters support Harris.

  • So you don’t like Trump or Harris – here’s why it’s still best to vote for one of them

    Jump

  • B) repeated your “1 = 3 = magical math” argument,

    before backing down,

    No, no, no.

    Oh, sorry, I thought you had backed down from this:

    I took the total percent of voters who disapprove of Trump (52.5%) and subtracted the percent of those voters who are Democrats (49%). The remaining 3.5% is therefore the percentage of voters who disapprove of Trump who are not Democrats.

    I then showed that there are a full 8.5% of voters who are Republicans that dissaprove of Trump

    I mean initially you stood by it, then you said the data was approximate then you found another survey where the numbers were closer (4% rather than 8.5%, but still with a magical 7 non-democrats being 8 republicans), then I thought you accepted that you couldn't do arithmetic with data from different polls, but here you are recanting your admission?

    I have asked you a very specific question which you have refused to answer.

    I have addressed (B) multiple times and until you answer my question about the exact percentage range that you would accept as proof, i will consider your argument defeated.

    Lol. "Give me a precise percentage to use in my meaningless poll arithmetic or you're definitely wrong." isn't as convincing as you think it is. I shall not participate in your illogical nonsense.

  • Trump Abruptly Cancels Another Mainstream TV Interview

    Jump

  • Trump supports Putin because he's idiotic. A less stupid and chaotic leader would be able to tell the difference between someone who gives them a compliment and someone who is a friend to the USA.

  • Trump Abruptly Cancels Another Mainstream TV Interview

    Jump

  • Not if Trump is elected, it won't!

  • Trump Abruptly Cancels Another Mainstream TV Interview

    Jump

  • This is really weird. You're happy for Trump to be elected because Cheney is so bad?!?

  • Trump Abruptly Cancels Another Mainstream TV Interview

    Jump

  • This is nonsense. Putin and Trump are allies.

  • So you don’t like Trump or Harris – here’s why it’s still best to vote for one of them

    Jump

  • Fascism 2025 it is then. You’ve made your choice.

  • So you don’t like Trump or Harris – here’s why it’s still best to vote for one of them

    Jump

  • Because the other person didn't do insane arithmetic between polls in a way that counted some people as three people then defend it three times before backing down, and then refuse to admit for another 24 hours that their logic was flawed.

  • So you don’t like Trump or Harris – here’s why it’s still best to vote for one of them

    Jump

  • I don't recall anyone saying they were Harris supporters. Why would they vote third party if they supported Harris?! No, the people you're arguing with just said that they dislike Trump. I honestly don't know why you find that hard to believe.

  • So you don’t like Trump or Harris – here’s why it’s still best to vote for one of them

    Jump

  • At no point have you made a coherent argument based on them, though.

  • So you don’t like Trump or Harris – here’s why it’s still best to vote for one of them

    Jump

  • Are you willing to admit that polling data is unreliable and that it's nonsense to do arithmetic on results from separate pools? If not, there's no basis for engaging with you because you'll just repeat the same nonsense with poll after poll until you luck out on one that is less obviously misleading.