Yeah, right. That 3 foot by 2.5 foot monitor is a totally normal setup that pretty much everyone uses for their social media. /s
I find that when I tap or click in an image in Lemmy it expands, and if I click again or long tap, it opens in another browser window filling the screen. Maybe try the duck duck go browser. Works for me on my windows laptop.
Post your image directly on Lemmy instead of linking to a corporate site who are under no obligation to keep your pic available unless you're paying a subscription to them, and who already stated deleting old images.
Also no because it shows up as "Content not viewable in your region" in my country because some stupid executive got cross about some stupid legislation that isn't about SFW images anyway.
Lemmy isn't subject to this kind of politicians vs corporations bullshit. Put it on Lemmy.
At that scale, contracts are multiple interfaces, not just one.
Good job all the compilers I can remember since the last 30 years or so can compile more than one file into a project then.
We're taking past each other. I'll saying that I don't see how adding networking makes anything simpler and you're saying that you need a bunch of network protocols. Why?
I'm not saying you shouldn't ever have networking, but then again, I wouldn't call it a microservices architecture if you're only using networking when it's necessary. At that point you just have services because it's genuinely a network.
It's not microservices unless you have unnecessarily added a bunch of networking, and unnecessarily adding a bunch of networking is innecessarily adding a bunch of complexity that I can't see makes anything better.
But if the contract were an interface, for example, the compiler would enforce it on both sides, and you would get synchronous communication and common data format for free, and team A would know that they'd broken team B's code because it wouldn't pass CI and nothing drastic would happen in production.
You told a guy who does childcare that women know they can wrap him round their finger, which iabsolutely is mistaking kindness for weakness, a very negative way of thinking, which is the toxic bit.
You don't see at as toxic, but others do and you know it's unpopular but you do it anyway, which is the no filter bit.
Unapologetic and unwilling to reconsider your position, you then start insulting people and being snarky, which is both toxic and lacking a filter.
I won't be surprised if you double down and go more abusive and dismissive in response to what I've said because you clearly see no intrinsic merit whatsoever in kindness, so why would you hold back from the nastiest you could be?
Some of us learned social lessons at school (alongside academic content). Trump did neither, and thinks that playground bullying is strength. Be less Trumpy.
Of course London had an exemption all along, because you wouldn't want London bus services to be run purely on what was most profitable with a free-for-all on routes, route closures and pricing.
Manchester had the ban lifted first because the mayor (Andy Burnham) said he'd institue cheaper fares and through ticketing, which was broadly seen by everyone (except the bus companies, who ran FUD campaigns against it) as a very good idea.
Now you can travel anywhere in Greater Manchester starting as many bus journeys as you like in an hour for £2, maximum fare per day £5.
Who does Trump sympathise with? Is it the "grab 'em by the pussy, they don't even care" victims of wealthy pedophile friends of Epstein, or is it the wealthy pedophile friends of Epstein?
Why? Because he, too, is a... Yes, you've guessed right!
Whose files is it that trump decided not to release?
The promise of oop is that if you thread your spaghetti through your meatballs and baste them in bolgnaise sauce before you cook them, it's much simpler and nothing ever gets tangled up, so that when you come to reheat the frozen dish a month later it's very easy to swap out a meatball for a different one.
It absolutely does not even remotely live up to it's promise, and if it did, no one in their right mind would be recommending an abstract singleton factory, and there wouldn't be quite so many shelves of books about how to do oop well.
I have a hard time believing that microservices can possibly be a well designed architecture.
We take a hard problem like architecture and communication and add to it networking, latency, potential calling protocol inconsistency, encoding and decoding (with more potential inconsistency), race conditions, nondeterminacy and more.
And what do I get in return? json everywhere? Subteams that don't feel the need to talk to each other? No one ever thinks about architecture ever again?
Mistakenly? Crossed the border illegally 20 years ago? Deported without the hearing he was legally entitled to?
Why is anyone surprised by this, and why is the article written as if this is the second time this has happened? This is what ICE does, all day. This is what it's for now. Due process isn't a thing, quite deliberately. Facts and legality aren't part of it.