Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L

Log in | Sign up

@ davidagain @lemmy.world

Posts
5
Comments
981
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Property developers well never, not in a million years, build enough new housing to make their industry significantly less profitable.

    The only solution is local government building social housing and being as good landlord at low prices. Good luck with that, America!

  • So you're going to vote to release them, right? Right?

  • It's not on opinion, it's just how grammar works in English.

    Also, hot news! Some people are capable of authoring content without an LLM!

    Maybe try it sometime.

    Also consider whether you might come across as defending pedophiles before you argue too long and too hard over how a headline criticising their child sex abuse is unfair because of some technicality that neither excuses the abuse nor is actually claimed by the headline.

  • Easy. Second hand electric car with a big range.

  • Sounds like you still don't understand and it's making you cross. I'll explain.

    Devastating Report Details How Underage Homeless Girl...

    The girl is the subject in the sentence. The sentence is about what she did.

    Allegedly Had Sex With Matt Gaetz

    Matt Gaetz is the object of the sentence. He is who she did it with.

    For Money to Buy Braces

    And this says why she did it. NOT why he did it.

    So the headline was accurate because that's exactly what she alleges. Getting all hissy about how he might have had no idea she needed braces is silly because no claim about that was made.

    Spending all day objecting to the wording of the headline, in particular objecting that Matt Gaetz might not have known she was underage made you come across as defending a rich and powerful pedo offender, which, as I said, is not a good look for you.

    A middle aged man having sex with a teenager for money and buying her drugs is starkly immoral even if he claims he didn't know she was underaged.

    Calling her "barely legal" as you did, when she was not "legal" suggests you're watching the wrong kind of porn and you think that stuff is fine and take the porn site's word that it's legal despite them warning you that it's on the fringe.

    Maybe you has a more intelligent point to make, but "you're a moron" didn't communicate it very effectively.

  • Your only remaining reason to pointlessly criticise the headline is that you missed the distinction between the role of subject and object in a sentence? What a hill to die on!

    Devastating Report Details How Underage Homeless Girl Allegedly Had Sex With Matt Gaetz For Money to Buy Braces

    Reread it.

  • The headline:

    Devastating Report Details How Underage Homeless Girl Allegedly Had Sex With Matt Gaetz For Money to Buy Braces

    She was literally underage. She needed money for braces. It's not a misleading headline AT ALL and wanting to put nuance on a headline about a guy treating a child like a prostitute is not a good look for you.

  • Seems a great many of you need this.

    [Content not viewable in your region]

    Nope. Don't need that.

    Did you know that the reason imgur blocks the UK is that it is trying to evade a fine for selling children's personal data?

    They are a shit corporation and they already deleted old data for posters that didn't have a paid subscription with them.

    There are other image hosts.

    Lemmy lets you upped directly to your instance and if gets federated.

    Don't use imgur.

  • (The war was over in Europe in May. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the following August.)

  • You're confusing those who were duped by trump with those doing the duping.

    Religion is useful to him. He isn't actually religious. He doesn't have any actual beliefs other than that he should be powerful, rich, important, revered and in the news.

    Protecting people isn't his thing. He's only protecting the pedophile friends of Epstein because he is one and releasing the unedited files would make him look bad.

    Trump is loyal like Pluto is warm.

    He loves people praying for him. He can't abide people criticising him. Hates it.

  • So I think it is you who do not fully understand this administration, if you think that trump will protect them while they publicly criticise him.

    He will not, and their prayers are meaningless to him. Only their uncritical and unthinking support is.

  • They're very sensual, but there's not supposed to be any touching.

  • You think trump is loyal to those who elected him?! Moreover you think that loyalty extends to allowing them to criticise, oppose or protest against him?

    No! Trump turns against people who supported him on the tiniest whim. He is the biggest snowflake of the lot and abhors criticism.

    They support him. NOT the other way round. He has nothing but sneering contempt for people who criticise him.

    Trump doesn't care about Christians or what they believe. He only cares that he can dupe them into supporting him by taking away access to abortion. If you believe he cares about Christians he's duped you just as hard as he's duped them.

  • If they're doing it outside that immigration centre, yes.

  • It applies to everyone praying outside the immigration processing facility. They certainly don't want God getting involved in immigration.

  • I'll take your word for it.

  • Clearly then theramins are asexual.

  • I'm on mobile and I'm using duckduckgo, but thanks very much for the link. Great gif.

  • Thanks.